Article V Con Con is a mistake. If you think otherwise please read more and comprehend the draw backs. There is only advantage to the de facto.
Publius is wrong and so is Eagle Forum and JBS for they ignore that we currently have no Constitutional limits on Government. There has been continuous usurpation since 1800 and the Justice Marshall cases.
The 14th amendment rendered the 9th and 10th amendment toothless with "NO STATE SHALL" limits and by putting the Federal Government in a superior position in all cases of laws.
Even Publius finally admitted in September of 2013 that some offending amendments need to be repealed - humm how do we accomplish that without using Article V?
All three groups fear the AV process and say we can fix the existing Constitution? How do they propose to accomplish that?
The slide show information is a false narrative and has been debunked by many.
there is no lawful legislation since sine die. so what about the 2nd 13th the 14 et al. they are nullities.
In order to get this amendment ratified we will need two thirds of he senate and two thirds of the House to approve of the amendment. That will not happen. The members of Congress will not vote an any amendment that would reduce their stranglehold on the states and the people. While repealing the 14rh and 16th amendments is a good idea, don't forget to repeal the 17th/
Congress amends the Constitution every time they pass unconstitutional legislation. The President amends the Constitution every time he signs an Executive Order and the Supreme Court amends the Constitution every time they misinterpret the Constitution.
The only ways the Constitution can be amended are revealed in Article V of the Constitution/ We don't need to amend the Constitution, we need to enforce it.