Here are the names and addresses you need to assist James L. Jones, Jr. who is facing two years on a “contempt charge.” Your help is needed in resolving this critical situation!
Let's jam the phones, emails & faxes, shall we?
Don't let up until James is a Free man on the Land!
RE: "James Luther Jones, Jr."--The Living Man on the Land
JAMES L. JONES--the CORPORATE FICTION
Case No.# CR-2015-00150 MOHAVE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT.
1. SUPREME COURT RULING –
NO CORPORATE JURISDICTION OVER THE NATURAL MAN;
Supreme Court of the United States 1795, “Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them.” S.C.R. 1795, (3 U.S. 54; 1 L.Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54).
2. In NO State of the Union, are “members of the judiciary” lawfully considered “government employees, agents, employees, or authorities.” Inasmuch, as they lack lawful jurisdiction over any Natural Man, or Natural Woman, on the soil of the Continental uNited States, and in its Territorial & Continental harbors.
3. 15 U.S. Code § 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty;
“Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal. Every person who shall make any contract or engage in any combination or conspiracy hereby declared to be illegal shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the (this) court.”
4. 15 U.S. Code § 2 - Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty, which states;
“Every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with any other person or persons, to monopolizeany part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, shall be deemed guilty of a felony, and, on conviction thereof, shall be punished by fine not exceeding $100,000,000 if a corporation, or, if any other person, $1,000,000, or by imprisonment not exceeding 10 years, or by both said punishments, in the discretion of the (this) court.”
5. AND, for further clarification; in criminal violations of the XI Amendment of the US Constitution which states;
“The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against oneof the US citizens of another State or by Citizens or subjects of any Foreign State.”
More information attached:
1. Jame's "Petition of Treason" against "Judge Lee Jantzen & others.
2. Superior Court 5/20/2015 Ruling & Orders/Oath
Mohave County Deputy Attorney's James J. Zack,
MCAO2 Investigator for the County Attorney Steven Auld.
Matthew J. Smith Mohave County Attorney
main number: 928-753-0719
315 N. 4th St.
Kingman, Arizona 86401
Mohave County Superior Court for the Indictment
Judge Lee Jantzen.
401 E. Spring Street
PO Box 7000
Kingman, AZ 86402
8:00am to 5:00pm AZ Time is now PST. AZ does not change time.
Kingman/Cerbat Justice Court for the Contempt of Court.
Judge John Taylor
8:00am to 5:00pm
The NOD I filed and all the Affidavits I files and what they filed are at
If it sounds too good to be true ...
You have now entered the Twilight Zone.
Unfortunately, Justia's version of the case cuts off at page 63.
Penhallow v. Doan's Administrators 3 U.S. 54 (1795)
Intrepid researcher that I am, and not willing to find a real library that has a 1795 case, here is Larry Becraft's ( be forewarned -- he's a ~gasp~ lawyer ) copy of it which ends at the end at page 120.
The point is that in all 65 pages the quote does not exist. Not even some of the operative words like 'artificial' can be found.
After all the case was about a ship -- 'The Susana' -- that was captured on the high seas in October 1777 by another ship -- 'The McClary' -- and sold based on an act of the Continental Congress.
Go ahead, Morton, just spread this crap so more unsuspecting idiots read it and say 'Wow, I never knew that!'
This article was posted to highlight one man's fight to be free. If he is using inaccurate quotes or information, then this too is valuable to us all, as we would not wish to misquote the SCOTUS or any other ruling/dissertation.
That said, I find that putting information or court cases here for your examination is always useful as this is a good way to clarify any inaccuracies intrinsic to the case. If this guy is barking up a tree that does not exist, he stands to lose his case, more than likely. Either way, it gives all of us the opportunity to benefit from your corrections and ultimately learn for ourselves, right from wrong.
Thank you for the correction on this man's misquote, but let us not lose sight of the fact that he simply wishes to be free as do we all. Any knowledge you bring to the discussion will be added to the whole and spawn more research into the subject at hand. My goal is always to bring into the light, subjects of interest, whether they are totally accurate in every part or not. If i did not post it, you would not have been able to help us out with your wonderful research.
So, thanks for your input and keep up the good work. I will continue to bring to light as much as I can to keep the learning going, for even when I'm off a little, we still have people like you to help keep us straight. I just hope all my spelling and grammar is correct.
Also, if you would like to write an article on ANY subject relevant to this site, you can post it on My Page and I can broadcast it to everyone for their consideration.
Thanks again for the correction.
These links work just fine for me Linda.
Perhaps I am connected to Google or already "signed up" as it were and you are not yet a member of Google sign-up. I'm not sure why you can't access them.
The United States acknowledges that their authority and territorial jurisdiction is limited, by virtue of the Organic Laws, located in Volume One of the U.S. Codes. These documents clearly define that the United States' authority and territorial jurisdiction is confined to the property which is owned by the United States of America.
Likewise the State of Ohio recognizes that their authority and territorial jurisdiction is limited to the property which is owned by the United States of America and the State of Ohio, as demonstrated by Ohio Revised Code 1.59, statutory definitions (g) and (h) which states as follows:” when applied to a part of the United States, includes any State, district, commonwealth, territory, insular possession thereof, and any area subject to legislative authority of the United States of America. “This State” or “the State” means the State of Ohio.
Section (h) says that the “United States” includes all the States.”
THAT IS THE STATE OF OHIO
Learn the ORGANIC LAWS of United States of America and you can put these people in their place like the government, attorney, cop, American Civil Liberties Union
The Anti-Defamation League www.OrganicLaws.org THAT IS LAW. They play on your IGNORANCE
If you think the U.S Constitution applies to you look up Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
learn organic laws then you will understand
What do you suggest we do with Dr. Riviera's informative knowledge and the difference between The United States and The United States of America? The rebellions previously fought, have all been defeated by government forces. What will make us successful where others have failed? What will allow us to secure our whiskey, our state, our property, our land, our Allodial Title to such? What redress/recourse do we have that will secure freedom for us and our posterity? What would you suggest we do?
It sounds like you don't understand what he is saying. Learn it and understand it and take your freedom back. You want your freedom don't you? Your freedom is in the organic laws.
You are perhaps correct hippie.
I'm not sure I do understand everything he is saying, but that is not what I asked you. I asked you what YOU would suggest we do, BESIDES learning about the organic laws and attempting to understand what someone else is trying to teach us.
I have made the assumption that you have already learned it pure and can help guide us yourself. I would ask again. What do YOU suggest we DO? Give me YOUR plan. I think I understand the lesson just fine. I am still not an expert however, so I ask for your plan. I am already in complete defiance of their deceptive practices.
I don't need your help, but others do. If you have done something to secure your own "sovereignty", then by all means, let us hear about it.
You have to understand it first Then you will know how the real law works Then you can put it to work Listen to what he is saying go to his website and read the organic laws If you want freedom it is in there and yes we do put it to work it is powerful