In order tor a crime to take place there must first create a victim, The individual accused of a crime must violate the life, liberty or property of another individual. One of the rights mandated in our Bill of Rights is a person accused of a crime is the right to cross examine the witnesses against him. In other words the defendant has a right to confront the injured party.

If there is no injured party, and no one to cross examine the individual accused of the crime can not defend himself in a court of law.

An government is a legal fiction and has no rights and can not be an injured party. Only human beings have rights. Individuals can testify against an accused person but a legal fiction can not. When a unjust law is enforced the accused individual becomes a victim.

 Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

98% of the people in prison were never found guilty by a jury. In order to avoid the possibility of being convicted of a more serious crime the accused pleads guilty to a lesser crime. In many cases they have committed no crime at all. This practice is an enemy of justice and an great way to raise money for corrupt lawyer and judges.

In the land of the free, we more of our people in prison than an other country in the world. The biggest crime today is that we incarcerate people for committing victimless crimes.

Views: 544

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"The person accused of a crime must violate the life, liberty or property of another individual."

I have heard this many times before, but where is it written?



Thomas Jefferson stated that it was a self evident truth that all men were created equal and that we all have unalienable rights including the right to life, liberty and the pursuit on happiness. It logically follows that it is wrong to deny a person of their God given rights. The function of government is protect and defend the rights of their people.

When someone violates the rights of another it is the responsibility of the government to hold the guilty party accountable.

What do you think is the proper role of government?

The main purpose and only purpose and no other , is the goverment is to protect life and limb, and property, and the Constitution.

That's the whole purpose of any delegated powers, and if they are not , they are committing a violation against the whole purpose of the powers given to them............

the State of Washington's Constitution says it best from the very beginning:

SECTION 1 POLITICAL POWER. All political power is inherent in the people, and governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, and are established to protect and maintain individual rights.

Is Keith saying that someone, like Martha Stewart should not have gone to prison for being less than honest during FBI questioning, because the FBI agent is representing a legal fiction and cannot be cross examined, by the accused? She accepted a plea bargain, rather than take a chance of being found guilty of proclaiming her innocence, on a charge of "Insider Trading". The threat was real... no fiction, there!

The IRS is quite another story! Anyone, that has had their bank account, or other property seized and threatened with "other" drastic measures... knows what futility is involved. Due Process is offered in a Special Tax Court, run by... The IRSI... Cross Examine, That!

Hi, Keith:
During the eight century B.C. a biblical prophet known as Hosea said that the people he ministered to were destroyed for lack of knowledge. During the sixth century B.C. an enlightened man known as the Buddha said that the greatest evil on this Earth was ignorance (lack of knowledge). Just over 2000 years ago, the most enlightened man ever was dying on a cross and he said, "Father, forgive them for they KNOW NOT what the do."(lack of knowledge again).

I contend that we are still ignorant because we are in the infancy of our earthly evolution. We are still pagans and barbarians. If we were not, we would realize that we are all ONE with our Creator. Mankind is at the greedy and hoarding stage. We take and hoard instead of sharing through equal re-giving, thus violating the second most important law of Nature and Nature's God. "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction," or better said, "What you sow is what you reap."

I can go on and on, but you get my drift.


Poppycock Jaques,
Americans are the most giving and generous people on the planet. As a whole, we give more than all others. Period. In THIS country we are learning to be God's people.

 * Corpus delicti
    - A Latin term meaning the "body of [the] crime" that refers to the idea that the requisite elements of a crime must be proven before an individual can be tried for the crime.

 * Corpus delicti. (Blacks 4th) The body of a crime. The body (material substance) upon which a crime has been committed, e. g., the corpse of a murdered man, the charred remains of a house burned down. In a derivative sense, the substance or foundation of a crime; the substantial fact that a crime has been committed. People v. Dick, 37 Cal. 281; White v. State, 49 Ala. 347; Goldman v, Com., 100 Va. 865, 42 S.E. 923; State v. Schyhart, Mo. Sup., 199 S.W. 205, 211; State v. Brown, 103 S.C. 437, 88 S.E. 21, 22, L.R.A.1916D, 1295; State v. Johnson, 95 Utah 572, 83 P.2d 1010, 1014. When applied to any particular offense, the actual commission by some one of particular offense charged. Gorum v. State, 60 Okl.Cr. 248, 63 P.2d 765, 766.
     * Corpus Delicti Rule - The common law corpus delicti rule prohibits the admission of an extrajudicial confession into evidence in a criminal case unless the prosecution introduces some evidence independent of the confession that the crime described in the confession actually occurred.
    - 64.3.moran_ In Defense of the Corpus Delicti Rule.pdf
 * There are two elements of corpus delicti in any offense:
    - A certain consequence, or injury, has occurred.
    - The consequence, or injury, is a result of a person's intentional, unlawful act.
 * Corpus Delicti - Definition, Examples, Cases, Processes

I think Mark Hamilton has it in this document also:

Law of the case- EXHIBIT "A".pdf

Interesting site to review Common Law vs Admiralty UCC Law we are under

You are correct on all counts, except----the Constitution for The united States of America was shelved after the Civil War and replaced by the Constitution "of" the United states. This 'of' thing means it is possessory. This new constitution that was brought in is only advisory in nature. Those in power use it ONLY when it suits their needs. It is, therefore, not the law of the land and we cannot rely on it for any degree of protection from intrusion by govco or fairness and due process from their administrators--the courts. 

As we have witnessed, the protections from government intervention in our lives is a hollow theme. Have you ever been in court when a subject claimed govco [court] was violating their constitutional rights? I've heard the judge tell a man that if he mentioned constitutional rights again in his court he would find him in contempt. Of course he would be in contempt because he is not in a court of constitutional cognizance.

He's in an administrative court that has been set up to fleece the unsuspecting of their wealth. The judge's duty as administrator is to administer the foreclosure in bankruptcy of govco's assets. Govco is bankrupt. They are squeezing the lifeblood out of the people through the straw man--the government's asset. They created it and they are the creditor over it as it is always the debtor.    

The reason most people are in prison under this system is ignorance. If the public was aware that these courts are utilizing maritime law under admiralty jurisdiction and that all courts in America are under private commercial law conducted under the consent of the parties there might be a different result.

Check that out. Go to the law library at the courthouse and look in any of their code and statute books and the first thing you will see is that it is copy written. You cannot copy right that which is in the public domain. Only privately owned material can be copy written. The bankers own the laws.

While you are checking that out, also check out the term "allocution". The judge will ask if you have anything to say 'before I sentence you?'. This is your opportunity [allocution] to lessen the harshness of the sentence with any mitigating circumstances that you want to present. It usually does no good.

If a judge asked me that question I would say "I reserve my statement until after you pass sentence". After he announces the sentence I would then say "I'm sorry, Sir, but I cannot accept your offer". If you don't say anything you have silently acquiesced and can have no complaints. I have seen this work where the judge lessened the judgment and the defendant said the same thing again and the judge lessen the judgment again.

I was asked what to say if the judge said that his judgment was not open to negotiation. The response should be "are you trying to force me to contract with your against my will?". That would be a federal crime of inducement to slavery and peonage. I don't think any judge will tread there.

Most go into court not knowing who they are or what to do about so they pay the fine or go to prison or jail. This is where knowing who you are comes into play. Are you the registered agent for the straw man [LLC] on the charging instrument? I've got a certified copy from the Secretary of State of North Carolina that says there is no record of the all caps name as being registered with the State. How can there be a registered agent to serve upon if there is no registration of the LLC? Serving an instrument on a living man and presuming that he is the registered agent for the fiction is done by assumption. If you don't recognize the trickery then you pay the consequences.  

Dan that was very good a summary. We can know the facts of who I am as a real breathing man created by God and responsible to his laws in which you must be sure which of the Gods you are guided by. Then you must know who is bring charges against you and what their jurisdiction is which is a fraudulent argument in the first place. The Corporate administrative company is not even a government and that is the beginning of their scam.

We the People ordained and established a free and independent state (small s) and established a constitutional contract for public servants to work in our Government. We the People allowed the Bankers and BAR Lawyers to come in and steal our property and replace our government with a public service corporation and revised our laws and allowed them to commit acts of treason, insurrection and other violent acts against our natural inherent and unalienable rights.

The jurisdiction they established in Maine is plainly written in the first sentence and paragraph of their revised statute which states:

"The jurisdiction and sovereignty of the State extend to all places within its boundaries, subject only to such rights of concurrent jurisdiction as are granted by the State over places ceded by the State to the United States. This section shall not limit or restrict the jurisdiction of the State over any person or with respect to any subject, within or without its boundaries, which jurisdiction is exercisable by reason of citizenship, residence or for any other reason recognized by law."

Words and phrases definitions of the statute is defined as:

 State.  "State," used with reference to any organized portion of the United States, may mean a territory or the District of Columbia.
United States.  "United States" includes territories and the District of Columbia.
Person.  "Person" may include a body corporate.

It further defines us as subjects which comes from the 14th Amendment.

That is their legal rules as written and when you show up in their corporate court, that is the only thing they know.

BUT Maine was accepted into the Congress of the United States of America on March 03 1820, as a free and independent state (small "s") on equal footing of the other states of the union.

The positive way to correct this mess is to operate by the laws of the days of our founders to get this record corrected. Our founders used the Magna Carta to impose upon the using the Declaration of Independence utilizing the Article 61.

So today we must assemble a body of 24 men to bring charge beginning in our counties to arrest the corporate crimes done by the false and fraudulent operations set up to violate the people with the treason and insurrection. 

Today the President or Chairman of the Board of the UNITED STATES Corporation gave the government authority back to the People. Now the People must arise to action in putting our Constitutional Government back into the Law of the Land.


© 2017   Created by Keith Broaders.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service