Constitution Club

In order tor a crime to take place they must first create a victim. The individual accused of a crime must violate the life, liberty or property of another individual. One of the rights mandated in our Bill of Rights is that a person accused of a crime has the right to cross examine the witnesses against him. In other words, the defendant has a right to confront the injured party.

If there is no injured party, and hence, no one to cross examine, the individual accused of the crime cannot defend himself in a court of law.

A government is a legal fiction and has no rights and cannot be an injured party. Only human beings have rights. Individuals can testify against an accused person but a legal fiction cannot. When an unjust law is enforced, the accused individual becomes a victim.

Amendment VI

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

Ninety-eight percent of the people in prison were denied their right to a trial by a jury. In order to avoid the possibility of being convicted of a more serious crime the accused pleads guilty to a lesser crime. In many cases they have committed no crime at all. This practice is an enemy of justice and a great way to raise money for corrupt lawyer and judges.

In the land of the free, we have more of our people in prison than any other country in the world. The biggest crime today is that we incarcerate people for committing victimless crimes.

A crime has been committed only when the life, liberty or property of one human being is violated by another human being. In order for a crime to take place there must be both a victim and a person responsible.

We have a God given right enumerated in the Fifth Amendment that guarantees those suspected of a crime will have the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses against them. When there is no victim there is no one to testify against the accused.

Only individuals have rights and artificial persons such as corporations can not testify in a court of law. 

When people violate a rule, regulation, code, ordinance or statute they have not violated the law and have not committed a crime. 

Views: 7611

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Has any one read what Lysander Spooner has written about the Constitution in 1867?

Read what he says about Voting, Taxes, Oaths.

People are being thrown out of their homes for not paying property taxes and I did not give the County Government the right to do that.

Everything he has said about the Constitution makes perfect sense and it is going on today right before our very eyes.

As a contract between the People and the government of the United States its worthless because no one has signed the Constitution since the people who wrote the Constitution, signed the Constitution and to think that UR father could sign a document that would bind U. is just plan stupid.

There is nothing in the Constitution to make it binding on any one after everyone dyed that signed.

If Any one can find that in the Constitution Please show it to me.

No Politician to this date has signed the Constitution.

No individual person has signed the Constitution.

Further more when any one takes an oath to Protect and Defend the Constitution who are they taking the oath to. Their Oaths are worthless, because their oath is to the air.

If this is a real "Constitution Club," We need to know what every one said about the Constitution just two years after the "Civil War."

We need to know the Legal requirements of this thing we call the Constitution, our social contract with the government of the United States and how it has come forward to this day without any one ever signing it since 1789 or what ever date U want to use.

Every one Needs to Read Lysander Spooner 1867.

We nee to correct what is going on today.

We have Lysander very prominently featured here and I agree that his work should not only be read, but that it should be standard text book material for ANYONE wanting to learn.

I would even venture to say that I would give him his own folder if I hadn't done it already.

Click Here for a look see.

We must be careful how we communicate information.

The Bill of Rights is only a short reiteration of some of our natural rights.

The Bill of Rights did not result in us having any right, as all of our rights came from our exclusive republican form of government through the founding documents collectively.

Wrong!

Our rights come from Natural Inherent Rights that existed before the creation or implementation of Government!

During due process never sign anything, do not enter into there unknown contract, all paperwork never be the defendant, your are the plaintiff, and they are the defendant. bring up contract issues and violation that lead to you to be in the court of a  hearing to be there but your attorney needs to be there lol,

it a trick you must be there and don't get a attorney, unless you want to play and prolong and trap them for fraud-  or first hearing that they tell you that you don't have, claim your constitutional contract and claim to be the beneficiary. claim in the obmnibus hearing all constitutional provision that was violated ,

that would be pretty much 1-10.  list as your defendants the police officer the city prosecutor or however is colluding and moving forward without the main issues you bring up in you filed motion to dismiss. 

If you need help just let me know, we can fight and win.  i have discovered how to win, and to get on the record so they will dismiss it whatever the crime they are trying to create against you,  contact info 406-369-9482 officerkirkland@icloud.com 406-642-3157  but you got to be willing to fight and never give up. 

Example ********

1/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}
TO THE OFFICE OF THE HEAD * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
\INSTITUTIONS IN HARMONY/
{special unit- for treason of inferior courts}
{Title 18 US Code Section 2381 241 242 1628 2183}
Dwane Eugene Kirkland
UCC 1-207 1-308 w/o Prejudice
bill of rights advocate /
witness/
self claimed
Constitutional officer.
Investigator/
750 5TH AVE WEST 1
VICTOR MT 59875
406-363-5284/406-369-0482
officerkirkland@icloud.com
Plaintiff
Stanley John Roberts
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
Claimed Beneficiary
-------------------------------------
10/27/18 03:21:01 PM/406-207-5002
Cause No TK 2017-1351
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
****
Defendant’s
STATE OF MONTANA* CITY OF
HAMILTON corporation * Judge M Reardon
Melanie D Isidoro
Karen S. Mahar * City Attorney
300 S. Second street Hamilton Mt 59840
406-363-7999/223 South Second Street
Hamilton Mt 59840
406-363-6823
Request to investigate findings AND PRESS FOR CHARGES
Comes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F. *
HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE *
To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts for treason by the breaking down
of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law of the land.
They {The listed defendants} violated the oath{Article 6 paragraph 2}by the committed acts of
treason by sedition during court procedures and by government trickery schemes - We charge{Count 1-Title 18 US
241-242-1628-2183- and title 42 US}for there actions of diminishing taken breaking down the laws they are to know
and protect{see attached records of excluded paperwork}2/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}
{The plaintiff claimed beneficiary Stanley John Roberts I attached the objections and during court and filed
they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered and the burden
of proof shifted to the prosecuting attorneys.
They the listed defendants violated in paperwork ignored and seems to think that the
Constitutional issues are irrelevant. They the defendants along together proceeded to move forward and
be impartial and illegally held a trial and went forward ignoring and diminishing rights and the
supremo law of the land.
Now comes for future record that the plaintiff request for investigations nd to hold those
accountable for violating the oath of office and now - {Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per
violations that can now be proven by actions in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the
law or be above the law.
{The listed defendants} are to be fair and impartial to protect the law and know the difference
between actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so.
{Marbury v Madison 5 US.137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no
rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436}
They- who ? The listed defendants excluded paperwork off the record and did not
keep records, and the judge and attorneys did work in collusion and stealing the claimed beneficiary
plaintiff Stanley John Roberts and his fellow Americans rights that they are to protect.
Any courts and government institutions corporations city towns and counties states or
federal is under agreement to govern by Constitution promised to govern by as institutions in harmony
in agreement between the people and compact states. The listed defendants from the beginning ignored
all paper work filed by Stanley John Roberts. The submitted of the discovery and findings in his
dismissal- grounds- complaint-and before all of this – the plaintiff was arrested put in jail and
tricked into a hidden unknown contract- that violated his choice to consent or not.
Stanley John Roberts was coerced tricked in to waiving his rights for a illegal blood test from police
military tactics of scaring plaintiff that was in fear or under duress.
Furthermore no Miranda reading and was ignored and was stated in court by the judge that
it did not matter to be read to him. The plaintiff Stanley John Roberts now claims the alleged {The
listed defendants} diminished his rights and now files criminal charges against the Defendant’s under
the Title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 US by sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT
GUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
According to the law - failed to protect provisions or failed to protect rights - even though
the {The listed defendants} given time to correct the errors and warning of criminal intent of collusion
upon the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts.3/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}
THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS
{The listed defendants} together refused to take the written provisions during court
procedures under the the due process clauses. Failed to protect the plaintiff Stanley John Roberts - the
court moved forward sweeping under the carpet thrown it in the trash- and meeting in star chambers-
without public or allowed witness-
THEY THE DEFENDANTS LISTED did collude on the main issues- violating the basic
bill of rights at a state level and federal level. And declaration of MT rights. THE JUDGE DURING
COURT PROCEDURES INCRIMINATED HIS SELF BY STATING THAT HIS COURT
DOES NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTION. HE the judge said in trial that the state of
Montana does not recognize the Constitution. {Count 1Title 18 US 241,242, 1628, 2183. and other
titles under title 42 US}
1/ Excluding evidence discovery of provisions. REFUSED during court. THE STATUES AND CODES ON
OFFICERS COMPLAINT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WAS DECLARED BY THE PLAINTIFF, BUT IGNORED.
2/ Failed to protect provisions. BY MOVING FORWARD BY PASSING CONSTITUTIONAL
MATTERS. And litigation mitigation behind the scenes.
3/ Failed to record court procedures- even though plaintiff has own records. NOT ALLOWING ON
RECORD OR STRICKEN OFF RECORD.
4/ Failed to have court in a public hearing. Had court in a private court hearing away from public.
MANIPULATING COURT HEARING TO LAST OF DOCKET IN PRIVATE NO PUBLIC
WITNESS.
5/ Failed to appoint a competent attorney that would protect his provisions then failed to. Refused to
answers plaintiff questions and paperwork filed. Then by colluded attorneys excused and filed a motion
to recuse there self. Then judge made attorney stand by for trial. MORE THAN ONE ATTORNEY
DID NOT WANT TO QUESTION THE CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS. IGNORED THE
ACTIONS VIOLATIONS OFF POLICE OFFICER ENCOUNTER TO INCRIMINATE THE
PLAINTIFF.
6/ Attorneys and judge listed defendants colluded by EXCLUDING THROWN AWAY IGNORING
DISCOVERY FINDINGS OF PAPERWORK. Without a legal determination. Ignored request to shift
the burden of proof over jurisdiction in question.
7/ Ignoring the Miranda rights that is required by law, and probable cause in question. REFUSED TO
ANSWER IN QUESTION OF RIGHTS READ BEFORE ARREST. OR OF TAKEN OF BLOOD BY
TACTICAL MILITARY METHODS.
8/ Failed to comply to the request of the remedy and recourse of invoking Constitutional rights.
REFUSED ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY AND CLAIMS AS THE BENEFICIARY AND OF
THE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW.
9/ Failed to protect the oath of office and the supremacy clause. REFUSED TO OBEY THE OATH AS
TO PROTECT THE CLAIMED PLAINTIFFS PROVISIONS- AT ALL LEVELS. STATE AND
FEDERAL.4/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}
10/ Violating there own statues codes of limitations of a speedy trial and the due process clauses.
VIOLATED TIMELY MANNER FOR SPEEDY TRIAL. IGNORED *
11/ Failed to let plaintiff speak to protect his self or allow objections on the matter of a fair due process.
THREATEN TO PUT IN PRISON BY JUDGE REARDON FOR THIRD PARTIES OPINION AND
WITNESS. VIOLATED THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF LIFE
LIBERTY AND THE DUE PROCESS OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL.
12/ COLLECTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE BY THE EFFECT OF THE POISONOUS TREE BY
PASSED EVIDENCE HEARING OVER ILLEGAL COLLECTED EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT
ADMISSIBLE.
FAILURE TO PROTECT PROVISIONS IS A CRIME
Provisions of claimed contract clearly cannot be ignored. This would be a crime itself by not
protecting the supreme law of the land that you are to protect. Count 1-Title 18 US Code Sec. 2381: In the
PRESENCE of two or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you fail to timely move to
protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of
capital felony treason.
Count 2- Title 5 US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec.706: Courts lose jurisdiction if they do not follow
Due Process Law. By ignoring the discovery and thresh-hold questions pertaining to the due-process denied, and
appointed attorneys and judges under collusion to violate the separations of powers.
Therefore, a conflict of interest for civil records- the listed judge and parties make money across the
bench for every infraction and unconstitutional acts that are enforced -have equity of $18 (eighteen dollars) for every
$40 (forty dollars) that comes across the bench of collusion. Conflict of interest/civil v criminal/court state trying to
create a crime or convert provisions into a crime.
By stealthy state regulations and codes and statues that are in conflict with the plaintiff’s provisions
under the protection’s that are guaranteed by the Constitutional contract, under agreement between the American
people and the government. Powers delegated to the listed violators judges and lawyers and police officers- for
ignoring provisions they swear to protect either by intent or error.
The listed parties ARE ALLEGED that committed treason by sedition- Count 1 charge – and Count 2
charge - sedition by breaking down the Constitutional laws. Those who do this have no judicial immunity. Title 18
US Code Section 2381. If upon conviction they are subject to a $10,000 fine-10 years in prison or both and if
theft is results life in prison.
Who says so? Owen v. Independence 100 vol. supreme court reports.1398 ; (1982) Main
v.Thiboutot100 vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502:(1982)--deprivation under the color of law. Officers have no
immunity when violating Constitutional rights from liability. SEE ATTACHED SELF RECORDS OF
PAPERWORK AND DISCOVERY OF PROVISIONS THAT THE COURTS ARE TO PROTECT BUT
REFUSED TO PROTECT.
THE LISTED DEFENDANTS ALONG TOGETHER Excluded ALL documents that would mitigate or
litigate the OUTCOME OF A UNFAIR ILLEGAL TRIAL WITH OUT CONSENT of the plaintiff involved with this
matter. Refusing to give equal equal protections of the law.
By violating the 14th Amendment and all provisions listed in complaint and further not giving a fair due
process under the 7th Amendment-And of course not a speedy trial. Clearly the judge did not protect the oath that he
promised to preserve and be bound to and did not protect the provisions brought to his attention. No provisions can be
denied or diminished.5/5 {Treason by sedition complaint}
Due to the facts of discovery -by actions - He denied the listed provisions and continued in favor of
violating the plaintiff rights. DURING COURT PROCEDURES THE JUDGE SAID MONTANA DOES NOT
RECOGNIZE THE CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN THE SUBMITTED PAPERWORK.
No one has immunity when violating or breaking down the laws they swear to protect especially
when they have taken a oath under delegated powers granted by the people they serve. CLEARLY THE JUDGE
AND LISTED DEFENDANTS VIOLATED OATH{Under Article 6 paragraph 2}
The supremacy clause -TREASON BY BREAKING DOWN SUPREME LAWS.- BY SEDITION
BY constructive fraud. The undersigned being first duly sworn upon oath states the following facts showing
obstructing of the plaintiff’s Constitutional rights. By the listed parties provision misconduct, criminal collusion, and
breaking down the laws claimed. Breach of Constitutional Contract that is to be safe guarded by the judge, and
secured in by the locked 9th Amendment at a state and federal level.
{See attached paperwork ignored and tossed away* dismissal grounds*complaint of
taken off record*} {objection for legal determination*}
Comes now that we the people the private person Stanley Roberts request that the FBI * ATF *
HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION * US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE * To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER
inferior courts for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional provision- supremo law
of the land. Thank you for your candid work for preserving and protecting life limb and property and the
Constitutional provisions at a state and federal level. {INGODWETRUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN}
{The claimed beneficiary}__________________________________________.
{ADVOCATE/Findings} ______________________________________________.
{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THAT ARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND THE 10TH
AMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due process clauses in the
Constitutional provisions. /406 207-5002 Stanley John Roberts - i attached the objections and during court they ignored the objections and the three times of asking for jurisdiction to be answered./They
excluded paperwork of the record and did not keep records, and the judge and attorneys are working in collusion and stealing his rights that they are to protect. and furthermore from the beginning they
ignored all paper work Stanly submitted, dismissal and grounds and complaint. and before all of this he was arrested put in jail and tricked into a hidden unknown contract- and forced to take a blood test
from military tactics of scaring individuals. without no attorney present/criminal charges title 18 US 241 242 1628 2183, and title 42 us. sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED
PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.
{Request counter claim for 50,000 dollars per violations proven in a court of law} No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law, they are to protect the law and know the difference between
actual law v illegal unconstitutional act. Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5 U.S. 137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no rule or law
making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436} Section 34. Unenumerated rights. The enumeration in this constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to
/deny, impair, or disparage others retained by the people. /Section 35. Servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans. The people declare that Montana servicemen, servicewomen, and veterans may be given
special considerations determined by the legislature.Section 31. Ex post facto, obligation of contracts, and irrevocable privileges. No ex post facto law nor any law /impairing the obligation of contracts, or
making any irrevocable grant of special privileges, franchises, or immunities, shall be passed by the legislature/ Section 11. Searches and seizures. The people shall be secure in their persons, papers, homes
and effects from /unreasonable searches and seizures. No warrant to search any place, or seize any person or thing shall issue without /describing the place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized, or
without probable cause, supported by oath or /affirmation reduced to writing/ Section 10. Right of privacy. The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be
infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Constitution of Montana -- Article II –
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS/ Section 3. Inalienable rights. All persons are born free and have certain inalienable rights. They include the right to /a clean and healthful environment and the rights of
pursuing life's basic necessities, enjoying and defending their lives /and liberties, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and seeking their safety, health and happiness in all lawful /ways. In enjoying
these rights, all persons recognize corresponding responsibilities./ 1 (a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so
takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any
judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book,
document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or
both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under 2the United States.
As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 USC § 2071 2 it is settled law that delivery of a p
leading to a proper official is sufficient to constitute filing thereof . United States v. Lombardo, 241 U.S. 73, 36 S. Ct. 508, 60 L. Ed. 897 (1916); Milton v. United States, 105 F.2d 253, 255 (5 th Cir. 1939). In
Greeson v. Sherman, 265 F. Supp. 340 (D.C.Va.1967) it was held that a pleading delivered to a deputy clerk at his home at night was thereby "filed." (Freeman v. Giacomo Costa Fu Adrea, 282 F. Supp. 525
(E.D.Pa. 04/5/1968/11 DISCOVERY/dispute but shall not act in a manner that coerces any party into settlement. *** Threaten prison time or jail time to force anyone to do what he or she wants during a
court proceeding. Telling plaintiff not to file any paperwork in his court. COMMENT [1] The right to be heard is an essential component of a fair and impartial system of justice. Substantive rights of litigants
can be protected only if procedures protecting the right to be heard are observed. [2] The judge plays an important role in overseeing the settlement of disputes, but should be careful that efforts to further
settlement do not undermine any party’s right to be heard according to law}
{Seal}

In order for a crime to take place they must first create a victim.

The individual accused of a crime must violate the life, liberty or property of another individual. One of the rights mandated in our Bill of Rights is that a person accused of a crime has the right to cross examine the witnesses against him. In other words, the defendant has a right to confront the injured party.

If there is no injured party, and hence, no one to cross examine, the individual accused of the crime cannot defend himself in a court of law.

A government is a legal fiction and has no rights and cannot be an injured party. Only human beings have rights. Individuals can testify against an accused person but a legal fiction cannot. When an unjust law is enforced, the accused individual becomes a victim.

Amendment VI

"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."

Ninety-eight percent of the people in prison were denied their right to a trial by a jury. In order to avoid the possibility of being convicted of a more serious crime the accused pleads guilty to a lesser crime. In many cases they have committed no crime at all. This practice is an enemy of justice and a great way to raise money for corrupt lawyer and judges.

In the land of the free, we have more of our people in prison than any other country in the world. The biggest crime today is that we incarcerate people for committing victimless crimes.

A crime has been committed only when the life, liberty or property of one human being is violated by another human being. In order for a crime to take place there must be both a victim and a person responsible.

We have a God given right enumerated in the Fifth Amendment that guarantees those suspected of a crime will have the opportunity to cross examine the witnesses against them. When there is no victim there is no one to testify against the accused.

Only individuals have rights and artificial persons such as corporations can not testify in a court of law.

When people violate a rule, regulation, code, ordinance or statute they have not violated the law and have not committed a crime.

I am a Vietnam Veteran.

I say, Ur all Wrong, the “Crime” is a “Breach of Contract Crime.” 

Although not a physical injury an injury non the less, with a “Victim,” known as THE STATE OF:?

“Breach of Contract” laws suits are not unheard of in America and just because they didn’t tell U that in Court, it doesn’t mean that it’s not a “Criminal Breach of Contract Suit.”

But lets go deeper into the tissues of this alleged Crime against THE STATE OF:?

First of all every one must realize the “THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,” is not the same thing as “South Carolina.” Just like Milk, Chocolate Milk and Milk Chocolate are not the same, as any one can see if you rearrange words or add words it changes the meaning of the route word.

 This is true of all STATES or COMMONWEALTHS which means STATE.

Remember Federal Express and The Federal Reserve are not part of the government therefore everything that has a government sounding name might not be part of the government.

"THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA:" The “Body Politic” that exerts Force and Violence to insure compliance with its Constitution and the Codes of Laws, Codes of Regulations and Statues supposedly derived there from and allowed by their STATE Constitution. Some STATEconstitutions clearly state that THE STATE OF:?is a “Body Politic.”

"South Carolina:" However is a name given in reference to what we should have come to know as the land with which one could live on.

Therefore U will never see THE STATE OF:? written on a map because THE STATE OF:? is not a physical place. But it is a legal "Person."

Therefore, THE STATE OF”? believes it has a social contract with every one through its Constitution and the Statutes, Codes of Laws, Codes of Regulations supposedly derived from their Constitution.

I have a problem with this line of thinking for the following reasons:

Lysander Spooners publications of 1867 just two years after the Civil War.

He talked about Voting by Secret Ballot and Taxes.

Every one needs to read his publications, it;s very imports to understand his publications.

No one has signed THE STATE OF:? or Federal Constitutions for over two hundred years and every one that had signed them are dead, so as the signers go so goes the Social contract known as the Constitution, DEAD. Legal contracts only last as long as the signers, unless a provision is made to the contrary.

Oaths are worthless.

They take an Oath to protect and defend the constitution from enemies foreign and domestic what does that mean, they are protecting a document from being harmed/destroyed.

All Senators, Representatives, Sheriff, Governor and others involved in the criminal activity of the new Mafia known as government are taking an Oath to hide their criminal activity and use the constitution to hide behind.

Taxes is the Protection Money that the government forcibly collects from every one because if U don't pay the TAX protection Money they will come after U and take everything from U.

Read about it in Lysander Spooners 1867 Publication about TAXES.

There is no provision in the Constitution to pass it on to the signers: Posterity, Their Children, The People of the United States or any one else.

If there is please point it out to me.

Where is the evidence that THE STATE OF:?Constitution and the Statutes, Codes of Laws and Codes of Regulations derived there from apply to me merely because of my physical presence on the land.

Legal Rule1. The burden of proof is always on the person making the Claim.

So if THE STATE OF:? claims their Constitution and the Codes of Laws, Codes of Regulations derived there from apply to U merely due to Ur physical presence on the land make them prove it.

  1. How can the Plaintiff, THE STATE OF:? in fact be a Plaintiff if it can’t prove Standing?

      Standing can only be proven and exerted by the Plaintiff, THE STATE OF:? not its Counsel/Lawyer.

  1. How can a judge hear a case from a Plaintiff that does not have “Standing” without “Standing” there is no “Subject Matter Jurisdiction,” without “Subject Matter Jurisdiction” the case can’t be heard.
  2. How can the Plaintiff, THE STATE OF:? in fact prove “Standing”if THE STATE OF:? can’t talk, read or write?
  3. How did THE STATE OF:? sign a contract with a Lawyer giving permission for the Lawyer to represent THE STATE OF:? and therefore becoming a client to the Lawyer.
  1. How can U be a “Resident”within the Plaintiff, THE STATE OF:? if the Plaintiff, THE STATE OF”? is a “Body Politic,” and not a physical place.

Note:The Senators and Representatives: are a “Body Politic”that Represents THE STATE OF:?

  1. How can U exert Ur right to question Ur accuser if the Plaintiff, is THE STATE OF:?
  2. How can it be a mandatory requirement for U to make a physical appearance with Ur lawyer and Ur accuser the Plaintiff, STATE OF”? can’t make a physical appearance.

Note:We should know that THE STATE OF”?  is not in the physical realm, it’s an Apparition, Municipal Corporation, construction of the mind only. Google “The Clear Field Doctrine.”

8..      How can THE STATE OF:? Imaginary realm enter into contracts with the Flesh and Blood Physical realm?

9. How an U be born within THE STATE OF:? if it's a "Body Politic" and not a physical place?

10. In The Massachusetts constitution they use the words "State," "Commonwealth" and "Body Politic"  as synonyms.

99 percent of the people in this country do not know anything about Jury Nullification let alone exercise it.

That is why it is a key point not to allow THE STATE OF:? to take U into their Court Room Injustice System.

outstanding *   I have tested it out and so far i have won, but i come across a few who fight and ignore the contract issue of the breech of contract and they move forward against the plaintiff.  when i file any paperwork on the record i submit as the plaintiff and flip it around and its them as the defendants the attorneys and the judge,

and when i do this they move swiftly to remove all paperwork off the record. then they usually dismisal or let the time of there statutes of ,imitation run out.  no matter what never sign anything and claim the conflict withe the breech of contract that they swearer to preserve by there oath, and if they continua on,

file paperwork of criminal charges of violating your Constitutional contract that is between the people we the people and the government who promised to govern by Constitutional contract.  and if you look into all Constitutions of the compact states they are in harmony.  ***

RSS

© 2019   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service