Right to Travel
This is being presented as an example of what one CAN do if one feels there is not a way to be free from the misuse of power by City, County or State government. This was developed as a response to the false jurisdiction assumed by our government at all levels. It is effective only when used as part of a complete package of affidavits and a comprehensive removal of the Strawman name jurisdiction which needs to be challenged in writing as well as other forms designed to completely remove ANY assumption of an adherence to any adhesion contracts or assumptions of jurisdiction based on your signature on the same.
This cover letter must be included as part of all other documents in this mailing. I am responding to your mailings dated, (_______). Your mailings are improperly addressed and the actions described within the correspondence are to be considered unlawful and fall outside of any direct or tangential “jurisdiction” implied or otherwise, as all original jurisdiction lies with the people.
Your actions are unconstitutional and as such are unlawful under Natural & International Law, the Laws of Nations and the Constitution for the united states of America. To disallow or attempt to unlawfully regulate the right to travel by automobile is a violation of the natural right to self preservation, livelihood, happiness and the Constitution and falls outside of any assumed “jurisdiction”. Original jurisdiction belongs to the people. There is no authority for the unlawful suspension of any rights. Further, you have no authority to make any such determination. Your actions CANNOT be ignored. As such herein is my response.
There is no authority in law for any State Department of Transportation to create, set, enforce, or prosecute law, or deliver ultimatums to individual American citizens. Pennsylvania Vehicle code Section 1786(d) is being misapplied to unlawfully include American citizens engaged in common travel to further their prosperity and success. These codes are not clearly written to include non-commercial activity, but are clearly written tot include COMMERCIAL USE OF THE ROADS ONLY.
The mandate in Art. I, Section 8, Part 3, of the Constitution, “to regulate commerce… among the several States” was included so one state could not burden another with levies or taxes, etc, not as a blank slate for manipulation of federal power. Opinion can be manipulated to express everything we do as having an effect on interstate commerce. To allow this wide open door of corruption and abuse to become law is preposterous. The right to travel clearly falls outside of this area or “jurisdiction”. This lawful right to travel is reinforced in Thompson V. Smith 154 SE 579
“The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his/her property thereon, either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city [or State] may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he/she has [inherently] under the right to ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’.”
This right is further supported in Chicago Motor Coach V. Chicago, 169 NE 22
“Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his/her property in the ordinary course of his/her business or pleasure,…”
American citizens, simply seeking “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” through travel must not have that right removed BY ANYONE, without “due process” of law.
As stated by Mr. Justice Sutherland in 1926:
“It would be a palpable incongruity to strike down an act of state legislation which, … seeks to strip the citizens of rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution, but to uphold an act by which the same result is accomplished under the guise of a surrender of a right in exchange for a valuable privilege which the state threatens otherwise to withhold. . . . If the state may compel the surrender of one constitutional right as a condition of its favor, it may, in like manner; compel a surrender of all. It is inconceivable that guarantees embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence.”
Further it is stated that;
“Private interests are to be evaluated under the due process clause of the fourteenth Amendment, not in terms of labels or fictions, but in terms of their true significance and worth.”
William W. Van Alstyne - Harvard Law Review, Vol. 81:1439
What’s clear is that American citizens have a right to travel by the standard conveyance of the times.
–“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among (not over) Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” -- Declaration of Independence.
This power does not descend from government, it descends:
This idea of rights occurring in this order is supported by our founding documents, wherein:
“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
“The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” – 9th Amendment
“The powers not delegated to the United States (federal government) by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it (the Constitution) to the States, are reserved to the States (discretion) respectively, or to the people (at their discretion).” – 10th Amendment
The right to travel has also been reinforced in briefs, affidavits and notices included as part of this mailing. You must adhere to this LAWFUL request. You must lawfully respond or face default. If you should default and not LAWFULLY respond, your non-response or inaction will be considered acquiescence. I am under NO legal obligation to notice you further.
This information is being presented to you without prejudice or malicious intent. It is given as a courtesy and done so lawfully. If you refuse to respond properly within ten working days from the time of receipt of this correspondence you will be in default and no further legal notice will be given. You will forfeit all right to defense of any kind and any violation may be prosecuted under federal law for crimes, including but not limited to, Title 18, §241, 242. You MUST respond properly to this request. The request is lawful and MUST NOT be ignored. You have TEN DAYS to respond.
Your Name Here
c/o Your Street Address
Your Town, Your State Republic (No Abbreviations)
P.S. – Return address must be copied EXACTLY as written. If there is ANY error in your response, it will be considered willful and UNLAWFUL and will be refused for cause and returned to you unopened. This requirement must not be ignored.
Your Name Here
I thank the author for producing this document but then I've personally seen a court that has no flag or flag pole over it or in it. The court in and of itself is evidence of utter disrespect and disdain of proper law. For I have taken an oath to the singular flag. Red, white and blue. Anytime you see a president parade around saying "Now we see a New World Order"
And Obama with a Che Guevara flag in his campain office, that's your signal that our constitution does not apply or is not applicable any longer in the courts.
Look people I live in the light of day people. We The People know it, the courts know it, the so- called president knows it.
Let me ask you all a question:
Based on all the flags so far mentioned and one other that you can find on YouTube, Search:
Tyranny, U.N. flag stands taller than U.S. flag.
The question is
WHAT FLAG WILL THE NEXT SO CALLED PRESIDENT SWEAR IN UNDER?
Will it be a:
Constitutional, Old Glory red white and blue flag without gold fringed where all your constitutional rights are respected and revered and not reversed under God?
Will it be a U.C.M.J. GOLD FRINGED MILITARY, ADMIRALITY, MARTIAL LAW INC. FLAG where you are guilty until proven innocent?
Will it be a U.N. NEW WORLD ORDER, ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT FLAG
where you have no rights unless the United Nations, One World Order give them to you?
Or perhaps maybe it's going to be the Hillary Clinton upside down satanic star flag I've seen on YouTube?
Or maybe its going to be the Chinese flag that I've seen in news reports on yahoo that Gavin Newsome is rumored to have raised over city hall San Francisco?
My mind is mushy at the moment in thought.
Please also note:
ISIS Said they want to take our flag down over the white house.
Applying thought about that viral statement concerning the courts and their many flags.
Before you can put up the ISIS flag you've got to take mine down.
SO COME AND TRY IT
I have a question for you. Do I have the right to receive mail at residence?
Post office to refusing to deliver- please give me your opinion.
Inspector general is telling my that is not in his jurisdiction.