Fraud out in the Open
Here's a passage from our codes here in PA. Title 75. Check this out.
§ 1571. Violations concerning licenses.
(a.1) Employees and agents.--It is unlawful for any department employee or any agent of the department to issue a fictitious or fraudulently altered driver's license when the employee or agent has knowledge that the application for the driver's license or the driver's license contains fictitious or fraudulent information.
So there it is, right there in full print for all to see; exactly what you were talking about. It is against the law for an agent or employee of the DMV to issue a Strawman "driver's license" if "the agent has knowledge (after you inform them in your rescission letter of course) the application...contains FICTITIOUS...INFORMATION!"
There it is. You tell them by registered mail, return receipt requested that the name on the application, license or both is a "FICTITIOUS" Strawman Name and they do nothing about it? Now you've got them right where you want them. In violation of THEIR OWN RULES!
THAT'S how you get 'em. Not for a law suit necessarily, but to win in court and show a pattern of FRAUD by The Department of "Motor Vehicles" and their agents/employees.
This alone should be enough to prove beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the intent of the DMV is to DEFRAUD and entrap normal everyday people into unknowingly giving up their rights.
This can no longer remain unchallenged. It's time to remove THEIR plates and THEIR registration and THEIR "Driver's License" and THEIR "Certificate of Title" from your possession and RETURN THEM TO THEIR RIGHTFUL OWNER!
Then hop in your car with your Go Pro camera instantly uploading to the cloud and see what happens next.
If you have ANY doubts that this is the right thing to do, Listen to ALL of these videos and get back to me when you've learned what I've learned.
Go listen to Rich Iverson HERE!
Don't come back 'till your done. Then I'd like to hear your Comments and Questions or Opinions.
Does that apply to SS, IRS, banks, utility companies and numerous other mail you receive? I've noticed the Credit Card company has sent my bills with the proper spelling of my name. There is also a requirement by the postal service against "ficticious mail".
The simple answer is YES.
As a matter of handling; each has it's own ramifications. And that is precisely why if you use the sovereign address technique, it only costs 3 cents to send a letter.
Here's what that looks like.
First name Last Name
c/o number, street name
Anytown, State Republic
usA, Non Domestic
No abbreviations, No Postal Zip Code. Always use (Your State) Republic, then small u small s, Capitol A (for usA)
Both the send and Return addresses must be written this way. After that, affix a three cent stamp and you're good to go. Try it. It works. Proof that Fraud is afoot.
Yeah! Many people tried this and landed in the gray bar hotel, in other words, jail.
Strawman, what the hell is that? Can't argue that in court my friend! A devotee in learning law, constitutional arguments, procedures goes a longer way than jumping right into harm's way with this type of approach.
I have not seen anyone come into the courts and provided evidence that the so-called STRAWMAN even exists. What documents from the powers that be have in their possession that is verifiable that this entity exists?
So forget the Strawman argument if you wish. This was written in response to only ONE question posed about the inherent Right to Travel, hence the subtitle. I've written many others and will continue to inform under this main subject title.
The codes I reviewed just in my state alone covered 24 pages; and those were just the notes, not the entire code. Thus the need for covering smaller bits at a time. Thanks for the input though, you are mostly correct.
You won't get a judge to address that issue, but you won't get him to address the Constitution either. That doesn't make either point irrelevant or false.
Watch for my next one soon on the Right to Travel.
Technically correct in the content of your claim, there Know,
However, it was by Presidential Proclamation 2039, that it was done as far as the Gold thing and the accusation of Hoarding and withdrawals from the banks.
It was in the text of the War Powers Act of Mar. 9th, 1933 that the T.E.A. was used and parts amended to include American citizens where previously they had been exempted in the language of the T.E.A. As written, to whit:
What your not seeing here Linda is that the word "Vehicle" is not defined. It is simply being used to define all of the other TYPES of conveyances. The word "Vehicle" is defined in ONLY ONE PLACE. To whit:
(6) MOTOR VEHICLE.—The term ‘‘motor vehicle’’ means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
Here's the Link if you wish to look it up yourself. This is the Federal definition, which takes precedence over any state level definition, because they never define the term "Vehicle". Also you have to look for key words that "qualify" their definition, like "Transport", "Person", "Equipped", "operate(r)", "Drive(r)" and see how they define those words as to how they're tied to the definition of "vehicle", etc.
Its a massive word game that they play with expertise on their side. You must learn the game and beat them at it. Don't be afraid to try. Look up all of the codes in your state that deal with "Operating" or "Driving" a "Motor Vehicle". Even if I take your states definitions at face value; do you notice how they define ALL vehicles as having a motor of some kind or another and very specifically EXCLUDE man powered/pedal powered items? That's no accident. Its because Vehicle means "Motor(ized) Vehicle", even if they don't directly say so in every definition.
You're not seeing the "Secret Code" Linda.
Read it again.
It says that a "vehicle" is a device which any PERSON or PROPERTY is or may be TRANSPORTED. So now you have to look up the qualifier words to see what THEY mean so that the definition can be fully understood. I'll bet you dimes to dollars, they don't define some or all of these qualifiers. That's why you can simply use the federal definition of "Vehicle" or more accurately "Motor Vehicle". They use what's known as "circular" definitions to confuse you into believing that they are speaking English.
It's like when they define "Person as a "Natural Person", yet they NEVER define "Natural Person. Nor does the Webster's Dictionary have any definition for Natural Person. In fact, the ONLY place I have EVER been able to find the definition of Natural Person is in the U.N. Charter of "Agenda 21". Nowhere in the laws, codes, regulations, or rules of THIS country is that phrase "Natural Person" defined to mean "You and Me". NOWHERE!
DO you see how they do it? Very sneaky. You have GOT to do your homework. Look up EVERY WORD that is a qualifier in EVERY definition. Don't stop until you have a definition for every word you don't understand the meaning of, even if you "THINK" you do understand the word. If they say a vehicle is a device that is Driven you look up the definition of driven. If they say "by a Person" you look up the definition of the word "Person", Get it?
Add this one to your knowledge base
(10) USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES.—The term ‘‘used for commercial purposes’’ means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
Click HERE Linda.
Watch all the videos ALL the way through. You might not get it done all at once, but take notes, go over your notes and then look up all of your state codes that relate. Then you should be well on your way to a much better understanding of exactly what to do.
Actually you might be surprised at how ubiquitous the terms and general approach can be. It's pretty much the same except for a few minor variations in the approach to your particular state's language construction. The same rule applies however, trap them with their OWN WORDS.
Use the fact that a cop is not allowed to violate the law to enforce "Traffic" (vehicle) Codes. On the road He's God. When you get him in the witness chair, he can't leave until YOU SAY SO. That's when you've got him. Then you're in charge and I'll bet he can't site the laws he's supposed to be following. I'll bet he can't even tell you the difference between a Summary Offense and a Criminal Complaint that shows a "cause of action". I'll bet the judge will tell you they are the same thing. Of course that's wrong, but he will be trapped in his own ignorance and then you've got him too.
And just so you know, there's no such thing in law, codes or otherwise called a "traffic stop". It's an ARREST! Arrest means to stop something from moving. Any "detainment" over one minute is no longer a casual conversation. It is a detainment, an arrest. A seizure is the next thing that can occur, but...Watch the videos. That's where I learned all this.
Don't be afraid, be prepared to do battle with ignorant people.
Yes Linda, You've got it. You're not confused.
So what if they want all that mumbo jumbo paperwork? Send it to them with a "rescission of Power of Attorney and participation, etc. Those details are spelled out in the Link I provided in the Article itself. You don't have to send them your car. You simply have to remove all that creates a state interest in your car. ALL OF IT! Your cite of code 55-2-108 notwithstanding.