Constitution Club

Rowan County Sheriff Jack Carter
 Click Here
Every American who wants the
County Sheriff to enforce the law by arresting Judges who violate the law, need to contact Sheriff Jack Carter at the Rowan County Sheriff's Office.

600 West Main Street
Morehead, Kentucky 40351
PH: 606-784-5446
FA: 606-784-1323

Views: 236

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Don, A contract is a contract.  Kim defied her order from her military commander to whom she has a contract with which equates to a breach of contract in law or at law. The only way out for her would be to resign or renounce her unlawful oath of office to a document that does not exist in law.  Kim could also file a complaint claiming that the oath of office she subscribed to is a fraud and invoke the Maxim of: fraud vitiates all. Evidence:  There is no document in law with a title of:  'The Constitution of the United States'  There are two (2) documents in law that do exist and they are:  The Constitution for the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States of America. 

Five Reasons Why Kim Davis Was Justified in Refusing to Grant Marriage Licenses to Same-Sex Couples in Kentucky

Written by: Hon. Sam Rohrer

Was Kim Davis justified in refusing to grant marriage licenses to homosexual couples in Kentucky? The answer is “YES”! Here’s why:

1. According to Romans 13:1, she is a “minister of God” appointed by God. As a result, her foremost and ultimate obligation is a moral obligation to God and biblical truth.

2. As an elected official of the commonwealth of Kentucky, she is primarily obligated to follow the law of Kentucky, which recognizes legitimate marriage as to be between one man and one woman. See this link:

3. As an elected official, her duty, under oath, is to uphold the law which means to carry out and defend the laws of the state of Kentucky, not resign or run from the first sign of conflict.

4. The Federal Judge David Bunning’s ruling against Kim Davis was not law. It was just the opinion of an unelected individual; thereby, Kim Davis has a greater standing before the people because she was elected by the citizens of Rowan County, than the federal unelected judge.

5. Kim Davis understood that her decision to defend her God-given obligation and constitutionally protected 1st amendment rights was the banner with which to defend this right for all Americans, and that it was more important than her own convenience and even her personal freedom.

Click here to read more of APN's thoughts re: Kim Davis' release from jail.

Sam Rohrer, President of Pennsylvania Pastors Network.
Kentucky Constitution
Section 233A

Valid or recognized marriage -- Legal status of unmarried individuals.

Only a marriage between one man and one woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially similar to that of marriage for unmarried individuals shall not be valid or recognized.

Text as Ratified on: November 2, 2004. History: Creation proposed by 2004 Ky. Acts ch. 128, sec. 1.

can you pass this public law onto Kim Davis, or her people? she will win her case AND set precedent, and overturn EVERY supreme court ruling regarding the government and religion with this PUBLIC LAW signed into law by president Ronald Reagan in 1982; the Supreme Court judges are in violation of public law; this IS the proof that the government recognize that G0d DOES exist, and even declared 1983 to be the "Year of the Bible"

here is the public law:

PUBLIC LAW 97-280 - OCT. 4, 1982

Public Law 97-280 96 STAT. 1211 (97th Congress)

Joint Resolution
Authorizing and requesting the President
to proclaim 1983 as the "Year of the Bible".

Whereas the Bible, the Word of God, has made a unique contribution in shaping the United States as a distinctive and blessed nation and people;

Whereas deeply held religious convictions springing from the Holy Scriptures led to the early settlement of our Nation;

Whereas Biblical teachings inspired concepts of civil government that are contained in our Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States;

Whereas many of our great national leaders --among them Presidents Washington, Jackson, Lincoln and Wilson --paid tribute to the surpassing influence of the Bible in our country’s development, as in the words of President Jackson that the Bible is "the rock on which our Republic rests";

Whereas the history of our Nation clearly illustrates the value of voluntarily applying the teachings of the Scriptures in the lives of individuals, families and societies;

Whereas this Nation now faces great challenges that will test this Nation as it has never been tested before; and

Whereas that renewing our knowledge of and faith in God through Holy Scripture can strengthen us as a nation and a people:

Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That the President is authorized and requested to designate 1983 as a national "Year of the Bible" in recognition of both the formative influence the Bible has been for our Nation, and our national need to study and apply the teachings of the Holy Scriptures.

Approved October 4, 1982

Mar. 31, considered and passed Senate.
Sept. 21, considered and passed House.

this public law has NEVER been repealed

this public law should also overturn the gay marriage bs the Supreme court ruled on
Do we have one nation under God or not? IF we do, just exactly when is The Supreme Court going to start defining exactly what that is? This ‘definition’ has come to a point where no partial explanation will do. So, are we all going to ‘go along to get along’, or get The Definition we all need?

Check out CSPOA then if you can support it and sheriff Mack. He is trying to get ALL sheriffs back on track with their oath of office. If we learn and band togeather the and only then can we take back our lawfull nation

Folks, It's all about contracts and maxim's, period!  I do understand and agree with the 5 points Sam Rohrer makes via Mike however, only if a contract was not subscribed to to the contrary. It really is that plain and simple, folks.  A lawful contract trumps all and I do understand that the contract of all who have subscribed to an oath is fraud and fraud vitiates all however, one must lawfully challenge such by proving the fraud within and I think I have done so in an earlier post specifying that there is no such document in law or at law to which such oath is subscribed to therefore, once proven beyond a reasonable doubt, that contract becomes null and void. 


© 2019   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service