Please Support the Constitution Club   

 Click Here

In order to survive and thrive, men banded together to form communities to protect themselves from predators. Men adopted laws in order to secure their lives, liberty and property.

The purpose of the laws were to punish individuals who would engage in activities that were injurious to the lives, liberty and property of other people.

All laws fit into one of two categories. Either they are written by the people for the benefit of the people, or they are written by the rulers for the benefit of the rulers. Laws which are written by the people tend to be just while the laws written by the ruling class tend to benefit only the rulers.

According to the founding fathers, Congress was responsible for making laws that would protect the rights of the people. Therefore rules, regulations, codes, ordinances and statutes passed by Congress are to be considered modifications or "color of law" and usually only deprive the people of their God given rights.

In Marbury V. Madison Chief Justice John Marsharll proclaimed "Any law which is repugnant to the Constitution is no law at all."

In other words only laws which support and sustain the Constitution are truly laws. Everything else is a perversion of the law used by those in power to control everone else.

When we obey unjust laws we give our consent to tyranny. It is our God given right and duty to refuse to comply with unjust laws.

True law is based upon natural law or the laws of nature and nature's God. When we violate true law we are subject to the condemnation of God and when we sustain unjust laws we become an enemy of our Creator.

When we are obedient to tyrants, we violate the laws of nature and nature's God. It is our responsibility to sustain laws that are just and to refuse to comply with those which are not. As God's agents on earth, we are responsible to decide for ourselves which laws are just and which ones are not. We were created to govern ourselves and the men and women we elect to Congress are our servants.

When a society allows its legislative bodies to enact unjust laws, they sow the seeds of tyranny. 

When we comply with unjust laws we are giving our tacit consent and by obeying these laws we support tyranny. The rulers will seek to use the law to acquire wealth and power and unless we hold our elected officials accountable we will ultimately become their slaves.

When unjust laws are enforced, innocent victims are created. When a government takes money from one individual or group and gives it to another it has committed plunder. Societies must decide that either the few shall plunder the many, the many to plunder the few or no one will plunder anybody.

In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson stated that "governments are instituted among men deriving their just power from the consent of the governed." Because governments power comes from the people, they cannot give to their government a power that they themselves do not  possess.

Since a man cannot lawfully lie, cheat or steal,  a man cannot grant these powers to his government. As John Marshall once said "The power to tax is the power to destroy." If man's property rights are truly unalienable our government cannot lawfully put a lien on our property. 

 Laws that are just, lead to liberty, equality, peace and prosperity while unjust laws are a perversion of the law which allow select individuals to control the lives, liberty and property or everyone else.

Taxation is a system of plunder where the few plunder the many. When a man takes the property of his neighbor he has committed a crime, but when the government takes your things, they call it taxation. Whenever a man or a government forces an individual to give up the fruits of his labor a crime has been committed.

Views: 1078

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

  This is so true. I have said for years & years no law can be a law if no-one will enforce or recognize it . I know I read that somewhere  since I'm not a deep thinker. But this and His Advocates are helping this old fart  learn , and maybe I can help some of these youngsters .Keep up the work may GOD BLESS YOU ALL.

As to your first sentence, immigration is a great example of this rule. According to the Federal Government there is NO such thing as " Illegal Immigration " BTW, on a side note, any Senator or Republican that does NOT vote to totally DE-FUND OBAMA CARE SHOULD BE THROWN OUT OF OFFICE 2014!!! God save us all. Thank you TED CRUZ FOR STANDING UP AND FIGHTING!

Taxation is a system of plunder where the few plunder the many. When a man takes the property of his neighbor he has committed a crime, but when the government takes your things, they call it taxation. Whenever a man or a government forces an individual to give up the fruits of his labor a crime has been committed.

     Taxation is also a system where the many plunder the many(democratic socialism), Article 1 section 8 does give Congress power to tax for the common defense and general welfare of the United States.  The copy of the US Constitution that I am reading from, does capitalize the U and the S of united states.  So probably legal plunder was intended all along,  The united states was probably better under the Articles of Confederation, the Confederation Congress did not have power to tax, only to requisition funds from the states.  This did lead to shortages in supplying the troops during the Revolutionary War, something that Alexander Hamilton never got over.  After the War was over, during a peace time situation, the Articles of Confederation should have been amended, to make the Confederation Congress more efficient during a war time situation, without giving it taxing power.  The powerful central government that the Constitution created, was the American version of demanding a king, like the Israelites of the OT.  Fortunately, the Antifederalists founders gave us a Bill of Rights.  

1788 Original Constitution for the United States, original organic, of the people government.

1871 Amended version CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES, US is a private corporation.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (1871) is the constitution of the INCORPORATED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

February 21, 1871 Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871* It benefits only the corporation of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and operates entirely outside the original Constitution.

By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People

This 1871 Constitution lasted until June 20th, 1874, when an Act was passed entitled "An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and for other purposes." (18 Stat. at L. 116) By this Act the government established by the Act of 1871 was abolished.

The government which was created for the District of Columbia via the Act of 1871 operates under Private International Law, and not Common Law, which was the law of the Constitutional Republic. This is very important to note since it impacts all Americans in concrete ways. You must recognize that private international law is only applicable within the District of Columbia and NOT in the other states of the Union.

June 20, 1874, an act was passed entitled 'An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and for Other Purposes.' 18 Stat. at L. 116, chap. 337. By this act the government established by the act of 1871 was abolished and the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate was authorized to appoint a commission, consisting of three persons, to exercise the power and authority vested in the governor and the board of public works, except as afterwards limited by the act.

By a subsequent Act, approved June 11th, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102), it was enacted that the District of Columbia should "remain and continue a municipal corporation," as provided in section two of the Revised Statutes relating to said District, and the appointment of commissioners was provided for, to have and to exercise similar powers given to the commissioners appointed under the Act of 1874.

1874 abolished 1871 – Abolished means caput.  June 20, 1874, an act was passed entitled 'An Act for the Government of the District of Columbia, and for Other Purposes.' 18 Stat. at L. 116, chap. 337. By this act the government established by the act of 1871 was abolished and the President by and with the advice and consent of the Senate was authorized to appoint a commission, consisting of three persons, to exercise the power and authority vested in the governor and the board of public works, except as afterwards limited by the act.

 

Reverted back to Original Constitution.  If no Continental Congress has ever met and changed the Constitution on this subject then it is still our Constitution.  CONSTITUTIOIN OF THE UNITED STATES is a fraud, acts only under UCC, and IRS and Fed Reserve are illegal corporations taking us to the Cleaner.  (Need research to be sure that this premise is correct).

 

A 1953 case:  :Congress also has had the authority to delegate to a municipal government for the District the power to pass laws which would alter or repeal the Acts of the Legislative Assembly. As we have seen, the Organic Act of the District of Columbia approved June 11, 1878, withdrew legislative powers from the municipal government. In 1892 the Commissioners were given legislative power as respects 'reasonable and usual police regulations'.  In the case, there is no mention of restoring the abolished CONSTITUTION FOR THE UNITED STATES. 

The key is “Withdrew legislative powers”.  So a Corporation that thinks it has legislative powers does not.

All true Osceola, So what? Justice Roberts said all laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. Don't follow the unjust laws and do everything you can to overturn or eliminate them. Knowledge is useless without action. And you can quote me on that.

Mort

I agree Mort, and have strategy for action.

http://algoxy.com/ows/strategyofamerica.html

Keep in mind, this is still forming and is "out of the box" created for us by the corporate gov with partisan politics.  All that strategy is good, but a recent concept really makes an effective proposal.

A party called the "Principal Party".  Members support constitutional principals and can logically vote for any candidate they feel is supporting the principles best.

The ideal is the only candidate that can get a vote is one that supports 1st, Article V, second that American prepares for it properly by fixing 3 issues which are a barrier to a proper Article V; abridged free speech, the insecure voting systems and campaign finance reform.  That action is called "Preparatory Amendment", and it is so constitutional, that no politician dare oppose it in a public fashion, which they won't be able to avoid with the strategy proposed.

After preparatory amendment, the convention pauses until the fully constitutional public environment has effect and the public fully re-knows "Constitutional intent".  Then a general convention proceeds.

Eventually all Proclamations and lawful steps to freedom fall to the Second Amendment for execution. The Second was almost the First. It should have been in my opinion. That way we could just shoot first, ask questions later.

    When a people's convention, under the authority of the 1st Amendment(right to assemble), backed by an armed people that the 2nd Amendment has provided, becomes a real possibility, then and only then, will establishment politicians sign on to having an Article V convention, which of course, they will take credit for.

Don't kid yourself. They're trying it now with a balanced budget amendment. That's enough to open the floor.

     The Balanced Budget Amendment is old news, wasn't that part of Newt Gingrich's Contract on America-I mean Contract With America, which then led to the last government shut down and President Clinton's affair(if you could call it that) with Monica Lewinsky.  I am talking about more of a grassroots movement, as far as where the 2nd Amendment comes into the picture, I think a lot of people make the mistake of thinking in terms of a revolution-militia vs professional army, that's not how it works.  In 5000 years of recorded human history, there is not one instance of people voting their way out of tyranny, I don't think that there is anything exceptional about America that will change this.  Thomas Jefferson said the tree of liberty must occasionally be watered by the blood of tyrants and patriots.  Some blood shed cannot be avoided, but this does not mean a full fledged armed revolution.  If African-Americans would have followed the Black Panther paradigm, it would have been messy at the time, but they would be better off today.  Instead they made an idol out Martin Luther King, which made them overly dependent on government, but they do get to vote.

Ok Steve, but let's get real. Read this, then tell me what you think.

Attachments:

    Morton, I did a quick perusal of the document, it is definitely worth my time to reread thoroughly.  The part of Amendment 45 that says one time driving license, is on the mark.

RSS

© 2018   Created by Keith Broaders.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service