Stinkin' Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln's own words reveal that he was a white supremacist!

Did he save the Union or did he destroy our Constitutional Republic?
George Washington is regarded as the Father of our country
and perhaps Lincoln should be considered the Father of our Government.



Voices of History

More Voices of History

Lincoln a Saint or a Sinner

The Real Lincoln

Lincoln Unmasked by Thoms DiLorenzo

Lincoln and Mercantilism

Ron Paul Discusses Abraham Lincoln

The Tyrant Abraham Lincoln

Abraham Lincoln Was a Tyrant

What Was the South Fighting For

Ron Paul Speaks Out on Abraham Lincoln

The Treasonous Tyrant Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln Exposed by Donald Livingston

You need to be a member of Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America to add comments!

Join Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Lincoln ; In my opinion attacked his own people ; "We The People" ; And by doing so he committed "TREASON". He did not free the slaves , he put all American's into slavery by putting us under the rule of Maritime law . Therefore Lincoln was one of the most treasonous President's in our short but long history . Restore The Republic back to Constitutional Law , which is called Common-Law and away from Maritime Law and we shall all be free people ; Again . Steve
  • Lincoln ; In my opinion attacked his own people , putting all American's into slavery under the deception of Thee 14th Amendment and allowing Maritime Law on to the land , which in my opinion would constitute "TREASON" . Therefore Lincoln was one of the most treasonous President's in our long but short history . Steve
  • Stephen, not to contradict you, but I might suggest that we, too often, judge the actions of our predecessors by today's standards. What was, at that time, considered prudent and right, in hindsight may indeed be viewed as treasonous. What little I know of Lincoln's understanding and circumstances of that day, gives me the view that he did what he thought best, as he was handicapped by his inability to foresee how others would use his actions against our Republic in the future. In a time when a country is divided so bitterly against itself (not unlike today) drastic and extraordinary actions may be taken. The difference now, is that our transparent bureaucracy is intentionally dividing us to gain more illicit control over our fast-disappearing wealth. Our division, I submit, would better serve us, if we make that divide between US and our bureaucracy. The sooner we secure that division, and permanently disassociate ourselves from our corrupt, incestuous bureaucrats, the sooner we can reaffirm our commitment to Constitutional principles and begin healing our Republic. That should be our focus and our goal.

    • Terry ; With all do respect ; Your wrong ! Lincoln made numerous trip's to England to visit the City Of London too talk to the Rothschild's . The Rothschild's seeded The Union that's how Lincoln got the money to rage war on the South . The real reason for the Civil War was to enslave the American people . This had been a long term goal of the Rothschild's since the end of The American Revolution . The Civil War was a False Flag too conquer the American people by deceiving the American people into thinking that The Civil War was about slavery and than tricking us into thinking that slavery was over by creating the 14th Amendment , which was intended all along to enslave The American People by using a law created by England back in early times to regulate commerce on the open sea's , which was called Maritime Law . The trick to enslave us was too bring Maritime Law on to the land and incorporating it into our banking system. This was Lincoln plan all along and also the Rothschild's plan. Therefore Lincoln was treasonous . Sincerely, Steve
      • Stephen, I apologize. I failed to make my point. What about "Our division, I submit, would better serve us, if we make that divide between US and our bureaucracy. The sooner we secure that division, and permanently disassociate ourselves from our corrupt, incestuous bureaucrats, the sooner we can reaffirm our commitment to Constitutional principles and begin healing our Republic. That should be our focus and our goal." is wrong?

        • Terry ;If we don't under stand our history and why we are where we are now ,then we won't know how to fix our problems in the future. The Civil War is clearly the reason why wear in the mess wear into today. The bureaucracy that you speak of is caused by Maritime law. To be free again Maritime Law has to be sent back out too the sea where it belong's and we must go back too common-law that's the real goal that your speaking of , until we revert back too common-law nothing is going to change. Our goal is to be free with a Constitutional Republic.
          What happen during The Civil War is real today as it was back then. You'll never solve the tyranny that we live under now until we go back to common-law. That's the premise or the point that you are missing. The problem will never go away until this one problem is dealt with . You can not get rid of thee bureaucracy until you get rid of Maritime Law . Anything that you dream of is only dream unless this problem is fixed. I be leave you have actually missed the point and I'm right on the point and your point is off premise and your problem solving leads to a premise that is unworkable . Until you fix the real problem , which is getting rid of Maritime Law and going back too Constitutional Law , Which is based On common-law. Your premise will never work. Sincerely, Steve
          • Stephen, we agree, our understanding of history is important. My point continues to be: what are we doing to fix it--how do we get rid of maritime law (process)? How do we purge the bureaucracy (process) of the parasites and miscreants so bent on our destruction? I am more concerned with formulating and executing our plan to repair the damage, than rehashing what went wrong. I have no interest in arguing with you, rather, I suggest we turn the conversation to a more constructive purpose. Your keen understanding of history could be a valuable asset in that endeavor.

            • Terry ; I read your post ; When we start to talk about solutions I think that we are on the same page . It's that you made Lincoln look like he was deserving and I couldn't resist giving Lincoln a black eye and a little bit of a history lesson to parallel with your opening on your first post . I guest you know how I feel about common-law ! That would be the foundation as to how I would construct my solutions , but before I get into it ; These things are a lot more complicated in many ways and need to be looked at closely so we don't come up with a solution that could in the long run lead too despotism and these ideas should be under the constraint's of The U.S. Constitution . I worry about despotism in terms of implementation . Briefly my solution's would be Common-Law Courts' and Common-Law Grand Juries too deal with Insurrectionist and Private foundations for people with needs ; Such as health care for example . The way I see it ; Know government in regards too the needs of the people . As far as law enforcement ; Only Duly Elected County Sheriffs , know Federal Alphabet Agency , that's Unconstitutional and also Grass Root Organizations to meet the needs of " We The People " ; Such as Community Watch Organizations , Home Schooling and Disaster Relief Organizations , which would be all voluntary including Fire Fighting and free training for Fire Fighters . This is after we get rid of Maritime Law and know more Income Tax , with a small Limited Government . Fees and sales Taxes too be voted on by "We The People" . This is only a summary of what I would be talking about concerning solutions . Terry I would like to hear your solution's or to elaborate on what I just said . Sincerely, Steve
  • How do you tell when a politician is lying? His lips are moving.

  • I think Lincoln was just an ass-hole just like the Presidents since Carter (excluding Regan).

This reply was deleted.