8575539456?profile=originalThe three brancbes of the Federak Government were created to be the servants of the people not to make decisons that grant undelegate power to the Congress and the President.

The jurisdiction of the Supteme Court is spelled out in Article III of the Constittitom and the court does not have the Constutional authority to decide what is and what is not Constitutional.

The final artbiter of the Constitution was vested in the states and the people. The The reoresentatives of the people in Congress have the lawful authority interpret the meaning of the Consitution. If they fail to do their job properly they can be voted our of office.

By allowing a panel of unelected lawyers to serve lifttime terms without ever being held accountable has been a catastroohy. Instead of limiting the size and scope of the Federal government, the courts have turned the government into a servant of the Wall Street bankers corpoations.

There is a common misconception that the justices are appointed for lifetime terms. If you read Artucle III you will discover that they serrve for periods of good hehavior..

The tune has for the people to evaluate  the job performances of the Suoreme Court Justices. We hold incompentent teachers, lawyers and doctors accountable, why not hold our Supreme Court Justices accountable.

If you were a coach for the 49er's would you want the coaching staff of the Oakraiders  to decide when their defensive backs have committed pass interference? Our willingness to allow the Supteme Court to make decisions that expand the federal government are example of the bad behavior that should lead to their dismissl from office.

You need to be a member of Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America to add comments!

Join Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • I guess it depends on which constitution we are talking about. We have the original Constitution for the United States of America where the people have enumerated rights protected there-under, and then we have the Constitution of the United States of America. The second is not really the law of the land but is discretionary in its application. Its nothing more than a by-law for the corporate govt. Its applications are merely advisory in nature and only called on when the need arises. The Supreme Court has operated to dismantle as many protections as possible in order to further subjugate the people to govts. absolute control. The big problem is that the people have been seduced to believe that the second constitution [we can shorten the term to Con of the United States of America] is the law of the land, much to their demise.

This reply was deleted.