All of the people on earth were endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights including the right to their lives, liberty and property. It is a self evident truth that all men were created equal in the sight of God.
It is also true that governments were created to protect and defend the God-Given rights of the people and that governments would rule by the consent of the governed. Whenever a government fails to do its job, it is the right and duty of the people to alter or abolish that government.
The government in the united States today is not representing the people, they are representing a small oligarchy of rich and powerful individuals and corporations. These unelected tyrants employ governments to use force when necessary to get the people to comply with laws that simply redistribute the wealth of the people into the pockets of the rich and powerful elite.
There are just two kinds of people in the world. There are those who are ethical and those who are not. Ethical individuals believe that everyone has God given rights and that we all have a responsibility to respect the lives, liberty and property of everyone else. An ethical individual will not seek to obtain wealth, power or prestige over his fellow human beings.
Unfortunately, there is another group of men who consider themselves to be superior and that they are not required to play by the same rules. These unethical individuals are motivated by greed and the lust for power. These unelected tyrants are able to enslave the people by paying legislators to pass legislation that makes it legal for the government to steal our property and our rights.
The rich and powerful are able to maintain their positions of power and prestige through political bribery in their efforts to control the wealth of the people.
These individuals include bankers, lawyers, judges, doctors, dentists, politicians, professors, insurance agents, stock brokers, real estate agents, accountants, police officers, journalists, movie stars, professional athletes and last but not least, government employees.
To educate yourself on the principles of liberty and individual responsibility go to the Liberty Tree University
Very well written and easy to grasp by those that do not know this.
I do, however, disagree with the following "It is also true that governments were created to protect and defend the rights of the people and that governments rule by the consent of the governed." That was true of the American government but I don't know of any other government that it applies to.
Thank you for your input. Having lived in the United States for my whole life, my comments were directed primarily to people living in our country.
People are unable to accept/believe anything that departs too far from what they currently believe, consequently few know who really runs this planet. Your article is so simple that it could resonate with a lot of people. It would be great if you could post it where a wider audience could see it.
What we seem to forget here, but we all know, is the fact that as of mid 1800s we became a corporation...no longer to be a Republic! In that venue, we have had since then to become absolutely, totally messed up in every way possible.
We are all assets of this massive corporation whether we want to be or not..would it be beneficial and apropos to cancel our voter registrations? When parents sign the Birth Certificate, that child then, becomes an asset of this corporation. If, when people get married and if I understand this next statement correctly, would simply refuse the license and have a marriage certificate, which is perfectly legal and is on the net to print, then the children do not come under this burden.
It appears from recent events that the sheep are starting to awaken from their induced slumber. It also appears that all is not going quite as well as desired for the controllers. Their reliance on the MSM to keep the people drugged with a steady steam of BS appears to be losing its effectiveness. I surmise that many who have smelled a rat(s) in the pantry are now recognizing the identity of the rat(s). The media is in a frenzy to bring their believers back into the fold. Watching the news on TV would actually be quite hilarious if you could overlook the mal-intent behind the scenes being promoted.
The corporate govt. is and has been for many years, in a state of bankruptcy. The judges, attorneys and the CPAs are the administrators of the BR and it is their fiduciary duty to extract all they can from the govt. to satisfy the creditors [international banksters]. They have implemented a sordid scheme to make every American a debtor through the presumption of a fiduciary relationship with govco's straw man.
This works because the public doesn't recognize the scam, or the fact that the SM is not them. No man or woman has ever been charged with being a taxpayer or code or statute violator. They always charge the SM and send the bill or charges to the living man under the unsupported presumption that the living man is the registered agent and fiduciary for their SM. The job before the courts is to extract as much energy from THEIR SM. They are liquidating govco's assets, that which is registered to their SM. Of course, they always claim some fiction of law [statute, code, rule] as justification for their actions lest the victims raise up and start lopping off heads.
Just how does one respond to these presentments from govco? My daughter called me yesterday and wanted to know how to respond to one of those camera speeding tickets so I dashed off a quickie for her to send in if she choses to. Bear in mind that I may have overlooked some things I should have stated but it was my intent to let them know that we know who we are, who they are, and that they are operating under presumptions that cannot be proven.
To Whom it May Concern,
I received a letter claiming HXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX committed a violation of public policy by speeding in xxxxxx, Washington on xx/xx/xxxx. The instructions on the ticket require payment of the fine or a plea of "not guilty" by HXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX. Whereas, HXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX appears to be a corporate fiction, it is confusing to me as to how said fiction can pay or enter a plea. If you are under the presumption that I, Hxxxx Lxxx Pxxxxxxx am the registered agent for HXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX please produce my 'letter of acceptance' which is required to be on file with the California Secretary of States Office as proof of registered agent status that would require me to accept service of your charges on your corporate fiction.
If you are under the presumption that I, Hxxxx Lxxx Pxxxxxx, have undertaken a fiduciary relationship as to HXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX, please produce the contract that I signed willfully, knowingly, and intentionally whereby that status of fiduciary forHXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX was completely revealed to me.
A failure on your part to produce proof of my status of registered agent and fiduciary forHXXXXX LXXX PXXXXXXX leaves you with no one to act for that entity. It is my suggestion that the charges simply be dropped. This suggestion comes from the prospect that the entire situation [no fiduciary for your corporate fiction] is futile and a waste of time and money. Since I have not been named in your presentment and there is no evidence of my involvement with this alleged ‘crime’, as well as the fact that, even if I, Hxxxx Lxxx Pxxxxxxx was being accused, I am not granted my 4th amendment right to face my ‘accuser’ (a camera); I see no way the government could prove my guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In fact, I don't see how the State can prove that the automobile allegedly involved in this matter has ever been utilized as a "motor vehicle" for the commercial activity of "driving", the carrying of goods or passengers for hire. The State may refer to my private conveyance as a motor vehicle to create the appearance of jurisdiction, however, it is a matter well settled in law that jurisdiction is based on the actual use rather than how an object is named. If my private conveyance is not involved in commercial activity [carrying goods or passengers for hire] I can't even imagine how said conveyance even falls within the purview of your commercial law jurisdiction.
I also can find no legal requirement for me to implicate someone else in this process, as it is the government’s responsibility to prove a person’s guilt. It is also my 5th amendment right to remain silent on the matter.
If it is the government’s decision to move forward in this matter, I would request copies of any evidence such as proof of registered agent status, proof of fiduciary status or anything else the prosecution may have of any liability in regard to my involvement in the “offense” cited; as well as, all maintenance records for the camera(s) involved. Please send all responses to the following email address: xxxxxxxxxx
I don't know for sure what will be the outcome if she sends the letter but I think that, in view of how the system conducts its affairs, they aren't interested in this case being seen by a lot of people who might pay attention, might wake up, and may refuse to pay in the future.
I'll tell you what did work. About 18 months ago my son out in California got one of those camera tickets. I had him tell them it was me driving since he didn't have the time to devote to fighting it. They dropped the charges. I never heard from them. I guess they checked and found the last year I had a drivers license was 1995. Why go after a presumed surety/fiduciary of their SM [that's the only entity they have any authority over] when that SM has no agent or fiduciary under contract?
You can't get blood out of a piece of paper.
Read the Richard Mack vs the USA court filings; when done there, realize that tickets are unfunded mandates and therefore illegal; find and read of David Bannister vs. the USA, taxes on domestic income are not legal; then go to Wyoming vs. USA on gun law..our ick, Governor Meade was a Democrat at that time I have heard, but a Federal prosecutor..he lost the case which should and does set precedence for gun law..not that any was ever, ever needed ... 1902 Dick Act and of course the Second Amendment.
Good response Barb.