CS REGIONAL COURT 1326 HIGHWAY 77 SEABROOK , NJ 08302

CS REGIONAL COURT
1326 HIGHWAY 77 SEABROOK , NJ 08302


Plaintiff
Claimed Beneficiary
Devin A. Peterson
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
1822 W Main St
Millville, NJ 08332
Court ID- 0613
Prefix-E19
Ticket Number 000596

*****

Defendant’s
STATE OF NJ- CORPORATION
CS REGIONAL COURT
JUDGE- Lauren Van Embden
OFFICER- Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018
ATTORNEY________________________
1326 HIGHWAY 77
SEABROOK, NJ 08302
856-455-8722


REQUEST MOTION TO DISMISS

To who it may Concern, even though Devin A. Peterson did not understand his rights and even though IN THE MINUTE HEARING completed the plea with out understanding. The plaintiff now request under the protection of the Constitution of the state of New Jersey and the supremacy clause of the United States of America in harmony. The plaintiff does not consent to any unknown contract regarding commerce or allegations.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Due to the facts of no victim or property damage this private person request for a dismissal under common law jurisdiction- In question. To have the victim to come forward with a affidavit of a actual crime committed. Plaintiff does not further want to obstruct the case loads on the Docket. Or shall tie up due to the facts of jurisdiction in question or to the listed violations of his Constitutional rights for the next seven months.

Signature of claimed beneficiary,____________________________________________

Third party Over-watch, spc/Kirkland/ Hamilton Mt – SISTER STATES IN HARMONY-
Assisting-406-369-0482 officerkirkland@icloud.com /civil records class/A# PROVISIONS@MAIL.COM


CS REGIONAL COURT
1326 HIGHWAY 77 SEABROOK , NJ 08302

Plaintiff
Claimed Beneficiary
Devin A. Peterson
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
1822 W Main St
Millville, NJ 08332
Court ID- 0613
Prefix-E19
Ticket Number 000596


*****


Defendant’s
STATE OF NJ- CORPORATION
CS REGIONAL COURT
JUDGE- Lauren Van Embden
OFFICER- Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018
ATTORNEY________________________
1326 HIGHWAY 77
SEABROOK, NJ 08302
856-455-8722


Grounds for dismissal
#1 I Devin A. Peterson request the prosecuting Attorney that has the burden of proof. I request a legal lawful determination of jurisdiction.
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Five: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous, crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service, in time of War, or public danger; nor shall any person be subject, for the same offense, to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Six: In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense.
#2 Devin A. Peterson Request to the State to claim the recourse under the Constitution at all levels- state and federal - Furthermore claim to be the beneficiary of the Constitution for the record.
Devin A. Peterson request that all who took the oath of office to protect his rights and all provisions that he is entitled to under the Constitutional contract he now claims.
If rights are not protected from those who are to know the law, and failure to protect is a criminal charge -
According to {Title 18 US 241,242,and 1626} and if they due fail – if upon conviction you are subject to a fine of 10,000 and 10 years in prison- and if any theft results-
life in prison. According to law- one can be sued under{Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983,Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986}-Clearly states that violators can get sued- anyone can get sued judges lawyers and even grannies-
Additional findings and discovery-Owen v Independence 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 1398: (1982) Main v Thiboutot 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502: (1982)- no deprivation under color of law.
#3 Devin A. Peterson now to inform the prosecuting attorney of the court -for the record.
He did not consent to unconstitutional acts listed in the complaint or affidavit. A bill of attainder or a writ of assist demanding money because of a claimed unconstitutional act brought upon the plaintiff- from the listed police officer and delegated powers of all oath takers.
Under the Constitutional protections of the supreme law that he now claimed under the {Article 6 paragraph 2}{Article 1 section 9 and 10 clearly states no bill of a attainer}
#4 Devin A. Peterson Request to inform by writing and timely manner to the state clerk recorder administration for secure records filed- this record and all claims to no consent to any unknown contract- except the Constitution in harmony. Let the claim be submitted to a candid administration and the common court for his own records.
COLLECTED FACTS
Due to the fact of no victim or property damage or elements of a actual crime or any negligence proven in a court of law. Devin A. Peterson believes beyond A REASONABLE DOUBT since no affidavit was filed or any probable cause. (AND THAT HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO REQUEST FOR THE VICTIMS TO COME FORWARD DURING DUE PROCESS)
The officer Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018 intent of actions to fish for creating a crime against the plaintiff. Officer did clearly try to create a crime against the plaintiff- According to law.
No state shall create a basic fundamental right into a crime- and justify it and diminish rights- who says so ? {Miller /v US, 230 F 2d 486 ,489} with no injured party a complaint is invalid on its face {Gibson v. Boyle,139 Ariz. 512}
Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative though it had never been passed . Conflict - no victim nor property damage. None can come forward to be questioned pertaining to the matter.
US V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty- Devin A. Peterson is using the constitution and supreme court cases.
16th Andrews prudent second section 97 says that it shall be interpreted in favor because Devin A. Peterson is clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of rights and property.

CS REGIONAL COURT
1326 HIGHWAY 77 SEABROOK , NJ 08302


Plaintiff
Claimed Beneficiary
Devin A. Peterson
U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
1822 W Main St
Millville, NJ 08332
Court ID- 0613
Prefix-E19
Ticket Number 000596

COMPLAINT


****

Defendant’s
STATE OF NJ- CORPORATION
CS REGIONAL COURT
JUDGE- Lauren Van Embden
OFFICER- Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018
ATTORNEY________________________
1326 HIGHWAY 77
SEABROOK, NJ 08302
856-455-8722

IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE


Devin A. Peterson the deepest respect for the constitution at the federal level and our states level. He takes his inheritance constitutional rights very serious. The plaintiff always will respect officers even though he has encountered officers that violated his rights. Even though he was tricked into a hidden contract and even though he has completed and complied to all request- he now request for the dismissal.

He wanted to let you know personally that (Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018 did not have no reason for contact and that there was no emergency in the matter) the officer representing the CS REGIONAL COURT- and the state of NEW JERSEY {violated his privacy}

Due to the facts and findings-
Shall possibly be added to a class A lawsuit for violations of the Constitutional issues and unconstitutional acts of institutions fishing to create a crime in a related area that the officer has no jurisdiction nor does the state with out consent or a actual victim or property damage. According to Constitutional contract.

Devin A. Peterson claims
Also the NJ violations of the declaration of rights NEW JERSEYS bill of rights's under Privacy violations) {Enumerated rights cant be diminished}and the protection of redress of grievance.

He claims in his submitted dismissal and grounds in question of jurisdiction, and for the burden of proof to be proven that they DO NOT have jurisdiction over the plaintiff.

In question of jurisdiction and the complaint or a affidavit of a crime- with a actual victim that there is none. And not a affidavit of officer as a witness to collect equity for the parties involved that has a conflict with separations of powers delegated by the 10th Amendment.


Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018* failed to protect the provisions and is suppose to know the law.

Violations of the NJ Amendments and federal amendments. That is actual law preserved by article 6 paragraph 2, at all levels. (Supremacy Clause)THAT THE JUDGE AND POLICE OFFICER AND THE ATTORNEY ARE TO PROTECT


Devin A. Peterson claims he was encroached and violated and infringed.

Privacy is important in all states to have a perfect Union it is essential. It seems that the(POLICE OFFICER )are trained to pray on the ones they serve. Most officers have no clue what the bill of rights provisions are. By violating the provisions it puts the public they serve in danger and there selfs in danger.

It seems the(POLICE OFFICER Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018*)-Institutions, do not know the locked laws but taught the statues and codes of the Uniform codes and violating our nations fundamental basic necessities of life, and capitalizing on it.


Devin A. Peterson claims
He knows the Government promised to govern by Constitutions of the states in harmony. And he prays for the officers and circle of alleged collusion to respect and hold and secure the Constitution at its delegated power. No public officer or delegated officers should cheat or deceive others.

Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative though it had never been passed.

THE OFFICERS BILL OF ATTAINDER IS A UNCONSTITUTIONAL, ALONG WITH PROVISIONS VIOLATIONS FOR FISHING FOR A ILLEGAL BILL OF PAIN UNDER {ARTICLE 1 SECTION 9,10. OF NO BILL OF ATTAINDER} CLEARLY PROTECTS THE CLAIMED BENEFICIARY Devin A. Peterson.

US V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty-Devin A. Peterson using the constitution and supreme court cases so he is not using evil motives or intents.

16th Andrews prudent second section 97 says that it shall be interpreted in his favor because he is clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of all rights and
property.

Devin A. Peterson would ask THIS state, and oath keepers to please call off your officers who is being bias and putting one self in danger and the danger of those who they serve.(Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018) Who are violating the private peoples freedom of basic necessities of life and liberty and happiness.

FINDINGS/
Under law obstruction to protect ones rights at any level is a crime by breaking down our laws. (Title 18 USC 241 242 1628)Sedition by treason And MT Amendments Section 10- Right of privacy-

The right of individual privacy is essential to the well-being of a free society and shall not be infringed without the showing of a compelling state interest. Or abrogated in legislative law.

(Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018) clearly did not show a compelling state interest by justifying violations of the individual's God given rights at all levels stated for the record.

Devin A. Peterson lives by the common law. He claims to be governed by republic -by the founding fathers of our nation and governed by the compact agreement within the states in harmony, by the Constitutions of all sister states in correlation and to be construed in all matters.

Devin A. Peterson just wanted to reach out for help- before The(Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018) is added to a class A lawsuit in a investigative mode. He knows there is a right way to do things and this is why He is writing you for help or support.

The(Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018)have caused great pain and suffering.By the over excessiveness bill regulated repugnant codes- and the additional bill of attainers and direct tax direct capitation or the writ of assist coupon and writ of contract to pay the courts and institutions in collusion. That is clearly list at a state level and federal level illegal. {Article 1 section 9 and 10 of the United States Constitution}


Devin A. Peterson ask that you tell your squads to leave him alone unless he truly commit a crime in there presents, and have a victim or property damage- that have filed a true affidavit according to the due process clauses.

Devin A. Peterson claims Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018 have violated their delegated police powers and violated the separations of powers,in the private sector. Even though the distinctive difference between commerce versus private person.(Police powers v police policies)

Marrano Kieling -BADGE #8018 seems to follow the public masses with ambition to intimidate and violate-life- liberty- happiness. And possibly chatter on radio making ILLEGAL {Gestapo running checks requesting papers like some third world country, like Germany as a example} VIOLATIONS OF ONES PRIVACY-

May it please the court
Devin A. Peterson request motion for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted the claim and exercise of a Constitutional right can not be converted into a crime nor conflict statues and codes. With respect -who says so ? Supreme case laws. Miller /v US, 230 F 2d 486 ,489. with no injured party , a complaint is invalid on its face, Gibson v. Boyle,139 Ariz. 512.
Signature of claimed beneficiary, ________________________________
Devin A. Peterson U.C.C 1-207 1-308 W/O PREJUDICE


{Constitutional Advocate} Dwane Eugene Kirkland UCC 1-207 1-308
Kirkland's opinion and findings and Constitutional study/discovery shared for those who have the ability correct the errors and violations of those who are to protect the laws of the nation and to know the distinctive difference in the actual law versus the codes and statues regulations that are in conflict with the claimed beneficiary of the provisions that are preserved by the oath of office. Most attorneys have no clue when they go to law school they have 2 years of contract law, then maybe one semester of actual Constitutional law, then they are programed to specialize in criminal or tax, or some other specialty pertaining to the merchant or commerce or Admiralty court system, they have no clue what the basic common law is and think that it has no merits in the enforcement of codes or regulation. Self claimed officer and advocate/11brv infantry over-watch 1-10 bill of rights/ officerkirkland@icloud.com 406-369-0482 provisions@mail.com Dwane Eugene Kirkland UCC 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice*
{COMPLAINT to all news -TO SENATORS/CONGRESSMEN/ FBI/CIA/MILITARY/ TRUMP ADMINISTRATION FBI/RECORDS FOR INVESTIGATION/RAVALLI COUNTY THE STATE OF nj. And all in harmony...

Views: 17

Comment

You need to be a member of Constitution Club to add comments!

Join Constitution Club

© 2019   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service