Only our foundations and principles. no other............. https://youtu.be/oT9G4hSswD8 The true intent of the fathers of this nation, read the federalist papers.
i believe in the government to govern by Constitutions of the republic states in harmony. i think the masses should make private citizens arrest th4 politicians who commit treason against the contract of the iron clad , Constitutions and the true intent of the Constitutions. https://youtu.be/oT9G4hSswD8
if you make it clear for volunteer taxes for the enumerated actual taxes for it would generate more funds than you need. but it must be volunteer for the freedom of choice. http://privateaudio.homestead.com/carltext.pdf Taxes is volunteer by actual law.
No , all show, the main problems are at home. restoring the trust in the police and teaching them the bill of rights, so that the states will not continua to rob the masses- and to save cops life, and to restore the true freedom to travel. ignore Korea until actually provoked, but keep a close eye on them and be swift.
focus on the Muslims taken over individual states this must be priority for the nation to excite. xxxx if you make it clear for volunteer taxes for the enumerated actual taxes for it would generate more funds than you need. but it must be volunteer for the freedom of choice. http://privateaudio.homestead.com/carltext.pdf Taxes is volunteer by actual law.
Yes according to the law, and restore the oath to military oath for the republic, and the pledge of allegiance to the flag. must teach our bill of rights's and to teach what is treason.
We must teach the difference between republic and democracy , teach the true intent of the republic democracy, we are truly republic democracy, not any other mob rule or treasonous acts of democracy of the optimistic of true freedom of agency and to the basic fund=mental principles.
Stop creating unconstitutional acts because the masses are done getting robed. And they are awake and are massing for the good of liberty and justice for all, except those who are violating the bill of rights and the Constitutions of the states that are suppose to be in harmony. https://youtu.be/oT9G4hSswD8
As long as its not violating anyone civil rights , or a violations of the states Constitutions, not codes or illegal acts hidden behind the color of law. Know the distinctive difference between actual laws versus unconstitutional acts, codes statutes and fraudulent laws made up at all levels.
Unconstitutional Official Acts
16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec 256:
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land.
The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be In agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The General rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it.
An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.....
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the lend, it is superseded thereby.
No one Is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Strictly speaking, an unconstitutional statute is not a "law", and should not be called a "law", even if it is sustained by a court, for a finding that a statute or other official act is constitutional does not make it so, or confer any authority to anyone to enforce it.
All citizens and legal residents of the United States, by their presence on the territory of the United States, are subject to the militia duty, the duty of the social compact that creates the society, which requires that each, alone and in concert with others, not only obey the Constitution and constitutional official acts, but help enforce them, if necessary, at the risk of one's life.
Any unconstitutional act of an official will at least be a violation of the oath of that official to execute the duties of his office, and therefore grounds for his removal from office. No official immunity or privileges of rank or position survive the commission of unlawful acts.
If it violates the rights of individuals, it is also likely to be a crime, and the militia duty obligates anyone aware of such a violation to investigate it, gather evidence for a prosecution, make an arrest, and if necessary, seek an indictment from a grand jury, and if one is obtained, prosecute the offender in a court of law.
Declaratory thresh hold questions
If one brings to the attention of a written document of discovery to a process to defend one’s self- and if a judge or an attorney ignores the written document, would this be a breach of preserving the constitutions of the compact states?
If a judge or lawyer makes money a percentage of funds across the bench would this be in conflict of interest to the bench- is this a breach of his oath? Is this a crime? If a judge or lawyer does not except a written document from a person defending one ’s self for no crime, with no victim or property damage, while a defendant claims to reserve constitutional rights, is this a breach of his oath?
If a judge or lawyer is showed by written case laws that are in conflict with the constitutions of compact states, would this be a breach of oath they are bound to? If a person who is under the protection of the contract of the constitutions of the compact states- is it the duty of the judge or lawyer to bring a victim or property damage forward to the accused?
If a judge or lawyer or police officer violate ones rights, and is written to the attention of the process and if the they choose to move forward without no written response to the defendant- would this be a breach of the oath they swearer to protect and preserve?
Can a judge or lawyer convert a reserved right into a crime? Would this be a violation of the oath they are bound to? If a judge acts like a prosecuting attorney through the whole due process is this a clear violation of the oath he has to protect?
Is the judge the trial of factor? Can a police officer take ones property before due process? Is a judge or lawyer or police officer limited by their powers?
If a judge or lawyer or any delegated power knows that a conflicting law is an unconstitutional act, and then continua to force it, is this a breach of the oath that they are bound to? Clearly every one of these thresh hold questions was violated and the cause and effect obstructed and denied me my dues process as a fair trial.
There for I request that the higher court looks into the recorded script and investigate my findings. I was denied due process and written discovery was excluded from the due process. Due to the facts brought forward in writing and transcript recording- I ask for a reversal of lower courts decisions. Based on the due process violations, and denying basic fundamental rights.
Crimes by the city and the city judge
# 1 (the city of Hamilton and the police agencies) are involving criminally prosecuting people without a victim or property damages, and justifying by safety- By tricking and enforcing stealthy hidden conflicting statues by distinctive difference by definitions of international commerce and none private people traveling to pursue basic necessities of life and liberty.
# 2 (the city of Hamilton) is using the officers to their advantage to enforce conflicting laws, even though an officer has a separation of powers for conducting police powers witch is limited.
The police are committing crimes there self as an officer by arresting individuals for crimes without no victims and no property damage, under the common law this is illegal.
# 3 (the city of Hamilton and its police agency and other institutions) are obstructing one rights by infringing on them and violating the 14 amendment 5th amendment - By obstructing the freedom to travel to migrate to other states with their personal property so being a modern mode of travel, which is with a personal automobile.
# 4 (the city of Hamilton) has continually turned a so called privilege to travel into a crime against its own people who migrate. It is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will- But a common right which one has under the right to life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
# 5 (the city of Hamilton) is hurting ones basic right to make use of an automobile as a vehicle of travel along the highways of the state.
Yes then expose those who are the enemies , as you did with the media. declare war behind the scenes to restore the true intent of the making of our nation.
yes, i think our military should fire the corrupt treacherous politicians and lawyers and judges. by firing squad.
Only to Americans , no other..... not any other Trojan horse, Muslim who are trying to take over the lower states and small towns.