Constitution Club

Plaintiff Claimed Beneficiary, Nancy Lee Prather U.C.C 1-207 1-308

BREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 1 OF 7
TO THE HEAD OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
TIM FOX,MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff
Claimed Beneficiary,
Nancy Lee Prather
U.C.C 1-207 1-308
1720 10th Ave S #322
Great Falls, MT 59405
05/31/19 12:32:19 AM
Criminal No, Tk-2017-0000862
{Violation,Title 18 US 241 242,}
{TREASON BY SEDITION}
{breech of Constitutional contract}
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT
****
Defendant’s
THE STATE OF MONTANA
CITY OF GREAT FALLS CORPORATION
REPRESENT OF INSTITUTION
* MUNICIPAL COURT JUDGE,__________________
* CITY ATTORNEY COUNSEL FOR STATE,_________________
* POLICE OFFICER,________________
VIOLATION OF OFFENSES
Comes now that we the people the private person Nancy Lee Prather
Request that the F.B.I. * A.T.F. * HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION *
US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
* THE UNITED STATES MILITARY * ARMY * MARINES * TO INVESTIGATE FOR THE
VIOLATIONS OF OATH OF OFFICE AND ARTICLE 6 PARAGRAPH 2. FOR THE DESTROYING OF
THE OATH OF OFFICE THAT ALL INSTITUTIONS PROMISED BY GOVERNMENT COMPACT
AGREEMENT BY THE CONSTITUTIONS IN HARMONY AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL.BREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 2 OF 7
To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts
for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional
provision- supremo law of the land. CITY OF GREAT FALLS CORPORATION
They{The listed defendants}violated the oath{Article 6 paragraph 2}by
the committed acts of treason by sedition during court procedures and by
government trickery schemes.
We charge count 1, Section 241 of Title 18 is the civil rights
conspiracy statute.
Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree
together to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in any state, territory or
district in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to
him/her by the Constitution or the laws of the Unites States,(or because of
his/her having exercised the same).
We charge count 2, TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242. Whoever, under color
of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any
person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by
the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... {SEE ATTACHED STATEMENTS
FROM THE VICTIM}
We charge count 3 Title 18 US Code Sec. 2381: In the PRESENCE of two
or more witnesses of the same overt act, or in an open court of law, if you
fail to timely move to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States
and honor your oath of office, you are subject to the charge of capital felony
treason.
We charge under the Titles 42 US ,Whoever, under color of any law,
statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any
State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of
any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States,
Explain , DENIED ALL PAPER WORK FILED DURING COURT PROCEDURES IN A TIMELY
MANNER WAS DESTROYED MUTILATED OR DISREGARDED WAS FORCED BY TACTICAL SCARING
TACTICS UTILIZING THE COURT AND THE POLICE TO CAUSE PAIN AND SUFFERING AND TO
STRICKEN THE EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT OF THE CRIMES THE COURT WAS COMMITTING OFF
THE RECORD. _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
For actions of diminishing taken breaking down the laws they are to
know and protect{see attached records of excluded paperwork}
What they- the defendants listed violated the privacy and exercised
illegal authority. WHEN QUESTIONED IN A TIMELY MANNER, AND THE IGNORING OF THE
CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES DURING DUE PROCESS- No jurisdiction or authority and
colluded to utilize the police in the matter of violating the privacy and the
bill of rights at the state level and federal level.
The requested protections denied and excluded from the record of
objections and claims,and the threats of Putin the plaintiff in prison for theBREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 3 OF 7
questions and claims,AND THE UTILIZING THE WARRANT PROCESS TO SCARE ND MAKE ONE
DO SOMETHING THAT IS ILLEGALITY UNDER DURESS.
_______________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________
______________________ {see attachment of pain and suffering}caused by the
defendants. The defendants did not allow for a impartial way to defend or
exercise of claimed rights THE LISTED deprived the taken of rights by not
answering objections and the taken off record.
During court action illegal moving forward without the answering of
the filed documents in the matter of the defense of the claimed beneficiary the
plaintiff Nancy Lee Prather,
Now comes for future record that the plaintiff request for
investigation to hold those accountable for violating the oath of office and
now - {Request counter claims for 50,000 dollars per violations that can now be
proven by actions in a court of law}
No judge or attorneys can ignore the law or be above the law.
Furthermore request that the 11brv infantry execute in the manner of taken
those in to custody for violating the supreme law of the land.
{The listed defendants} are to be fair and impartial to protect the
law and know the difference between actual law v illegal unconstitutional acts.
Who says so- the people say so-the law says so. {Marbury v Madison 5
US.137}{Where rights secured by the constitution are involved there can be no
rule or law making legislation which would abrogate abolish them Miranda v.
Arizona, 384 U.S. 436}
Abolishing ones defense to defend one's self. The defendant parties
did and moved forward to a trial without consent and proper counsel. During all
claims for a legal determination of authority and jurisdiction asked many times
and filed many times.
Any courts and government institutions corporations city towns and
counties states or federal is under agreement to govern by Constitution
promised to govern by as institutions in harmony in agreement between the
people and compact states.
The listed defendants from the beginning ignored all paper work filed
by PLAINTIFF,Nancy Lee Prather
She submitted of the discovery and findings in the dismissal- grounds-
complaint-and before all of this – the plaintiff was threaten to be arrested
tricked into a hidden unknown contract- that violate choice to consent or not.
The plaintiff now claims the alleged {The listed defendants}
diminished he rights and now files request to proper agencies for criminal
charges against the Defendant’s under the Title 18 US 241 242,and title 42 US
by sedition of treason FAILING TO PROTECT GUARANTEED PROVISIONS AT A STATE AND
FEDERAL LEVEL.BREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 4 OF 7
According to the law failed to protect provisions or failed to protect
rights provisions declarations even though {The listed defendants} given time
to correct the errors and warning of criminal intent of collusion upon the
plaintiff.
THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS
{The listed defendants} together refused to take the written
provisions during illegal court procedures under the due process clauses.
Failed to protect the plaintiff.
THEY THE DEFENDANTS LISTED did collude on the main issues- violating
the basic bill of rights at a state level and federal level. And declaration of
MT rights.
Failed to protect provisions. BY MOVING FORWARD BY PASSING
CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS.
Attorneys and judge listed defendants colluded by EXCLUDING THROWN
AWAY IGNORING DISCOVERY FINDINGS OF PAPERWORK. Without a legal determination.
Ignored request to shift the burden of proof over jurisdiction in question.
Failed to comply to the request of the remedy and recourse of invoking
Constitutional rights by the plaintiff.
DEFENDANTS REFUSED ALL CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDY AND CLAIMS AS THE BENEFICIARY AND
OF THE PROTECTIONS REQUIRED BY LAW.
Failed to protect the oath of office and the supremacy clause. REFUSED
TO OBEY THE OATH AS TO PROTECT THE CLAIMED PLAINTIFFS PROVISIONS- AT ALL
LEVELS. STATE AND FEDERAL.
Failed to let plaintiff speak to protect self or allow objections
on the matter of a fair due process. REMOVED ALL ADVOCATE SUPPORTING ELEMENTS
FROM THE DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURES. THREATEN TO PUT PLAINTIFF IN PRISON by
TRYING TO SCARE HER WITH TACTICS TO MAKE HER COMPLY.
VIOLATED THE 5TH AMENDMENT AND THE 1ST AMENDMENT OF LIFE LIBERTY
AND THE DUE PROCESS OF A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL TRIAL. VIOLATED PRIVACY AND LIFE
LIBERTY TO PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.
AND TO TRY TO CREATE A CRIME WITHOUT NO VICTIM OR PROPERTY DAMAGE
OF A LAWFUL AFFIDAVIT OF TWO OR MORE WITNESS THAT WAS HARMED.
COLLECTED ILLEGAL EVIDENCE BY THE EFFECT OF THE POISONOUS TREE BY
PASSED EVIDENCE HEARING OVER ILLEGAL COLLECTED EVIDENCE THAT IS NOT ADMISSIBLE.
Provisions of claimed contract clearly cannot be ignored. This would
be a crime itself by not protecting the supreme law of the land that
GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS AND CORPORATIONS ARE TO PROTECT.
Count 2- Title 5 US Code Sec. 556(d), Sec. 557, Sec.706: Courts lose
jurisdiction if they do not follow Due Process Law.
By ignoring the discovery and thresh-hold questions pertaining to theBREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 5 OF 7
due-process denied, and appointed attorneys and judges under collusion to
violate the separations of powers.
Therefore, a conflict of interest for civil records- the listed judge
and parties make money across the bench for every infraction and
unconstitutional acts that are enforced -have equity of $18 (eighteen dollars)
for every $40 (forty dollars) that comes across the bench of collusion.
Conflict of interest/civil v criminal/court state trying to create a
crime or convert provisions into a crime.
By stealthy state regulations and codes and statues that are in
conflict with the plaintiff’s provisions under the protection’s that are
guaranteed by the Constitutional contract, under agreement between the American
people and the government.
Powers delegated to the listed violators judges and lawyers and police
officers- charges for ignoring provisions they swear to protect either by
intent or error.
The listed parties ARE ALLEGED that committed treason by sedition-
Count 1 charge – and Count 2 charge and count 3 - sedition by breaking down
the Constitutional laws.
Those who do this have no judicial immunity. Title 18 US Code Section
2381. If upon conviction they are subject to a $10,000 fine-10 years in prison
or both and if theft is results life in prison.
Who says so? Owen v. Independence 100 vol. supreme court
reports.1398 ; (1982) Main v.Thiboutot100 vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502:
(1982)--deprivation under the color of law. Officers have no immunity when
violating Constitutional rights from liability.
SEE ATTACHED SELF RECORDS OF PAPERWORK AND DISCOVERY OF PROVISIONS
THAT THE COURTS ARE TO PROTECT BUT REFUSED TO PROTECT.
Was given in a timely manner by the claimed beneficiary.
THE LISTED DEFENDANTS ALONG TOGETHER Excluded ALL documents that
would mitigate or litigate the OUTCOME OF A UNFAIR ILLEGAL TRIAL WITH OUT
CONSENT of the plaintiff involved with this matter. Refusing to give equal
protections of the law. As a private claimed beneficiary.
No one has immunity when violating or breaking down the laws that
they swear to protect especially when they have taken a oath under delegated
powers granted by the people they serve. CLEARLY THE LISTED DEFENDANTS VIOLATED
OATH{Under Article 6 paragraph 2}
The supremacy clause -TREASON BY BREAKING DOWN SUPREME LAWS.- BY
SEDITION BY constructive fraud. The undersigned being first duly sworn upon
oath states the following facts showing obstructing of the plaintiff’s
Constitutional rights.
By the listed parties provision misconduct, criminal collusion, and
breaking down the laws claimed. Breach of Constitutional Contract that is to be
safe guarded by the judge, and secured in by the locked 9th Amendment at a
state and federal level.BREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 6 OF 7
Comes now that we the people the private person claimed beneficiary
plaintiff request that the FBI * ATF * HOMELAND SECURITY * TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
* US MARSHALS OFFICE * THE HEAD OF THE SHERIFF DEPARTMENT * DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE * AND ALL MILITARY INSTITUTIONS TO TAKE ACTIONS ON THE VIOLATORS.
To investigate the procedures findings of the LOWER inferior courts
for treason by the breaking down of the laws of the provisions- Constitutional
provision- supremo law of the land. Please forward to the proper institutions
for the matter TO BE DEALT WITH.
Thank you for your candid work for preserving and protecting life limb and
property and the Constitutional provisions at a state and federal level.
{INGODWETRUST MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN}
{The claim beneficiary} Plaintiff private
Nancy Lee Prather
__________________________________
{ADVOCATE/Findings}__________________________________
{CONTRACT VIOLATION AT A STATE AND FEDERAL LEVEL THAT ARE LOCKED IN BY ENUMERATED POWERS DELEGATED/ LOCKED BY THE 9TH AMENDMENT/ AND
THE 10TH AMENDMENT// Statement lower language/ encroachment infringement/violations of the bill of rights at a state level and federal level, MT provisions sections listed in complaint/due
EVIDENCE/
1. Arraignment signed under duress and threat ..judge plead for me. enclosed
Omnibus, conditional guilty plea to STOP TRIAL and get an appeal...
also a
Motion 2 days before trial denied minuted before the trial... because no
verified injured party.
2, Notice and Declaration
Officer and Chief.
3. Jan 22 Motion
denied
was sent certified mail to all court ..and police
Chief Prosecutor.
4. Motion demand Dismiss sent again..prosecutor response April 25, 2018 arrest
warrant, issued, did not appear at sentencing hearing.
5. Reconsider Motion to Dismiss.. explains
that the District Court appeal
Exhibit #1 filed.. i revoked all prior statutory filings or consents if in
the statutory jurisdiction including the guilty plea which was under
duress,.. ...
Judge Denies Motion to Reconsider.
6. Offer to pay tickets...Denied by Judge...MUST APPEAR IN PERSON, can't pay
by mail....Default filed because he didn't answer HOW to Pay
pg. 2
7. ..Response by Prosecutor..
the case.
to my Corporate Denial Document . was filed into
8.
Judge closes my file from any more filings... May 2, 2018
appear in court in open session to settle the matter..
ORDERS me to
This is the last i have heard from them.
The judge told be right before the trial i could not used the Constitution or
UCC in my defense ONLY statutes and codes.. i have it on a CD,,not a written
transcript. for the record.BREECH OF CONSTITUTIONAL CONTRACT 7 OF 7
There is a lot more during the time i got ticket in Feb. 2. 2017 until May,
2018.
other Notices to All the Police Dept Chief 2 Officers and the court...
was also Noticed.
I sent someone down to the clerk window to get a copy of the bench warrant and
they said there is No Paper copy.... very adamantly.
I started out with a Jurisdiction Challenge ..all has been denied..
i have learned much along this journey.
Thank you kindly,
Nancy, Living soul, All rights Reserved
{SEE ALL RECORDS SAVED ON THE PLAINTIFFS SIDE}
{Seal}

Views: 16

Comment

You need to be a member of Constitution Club to add comments!

Join Constitution Club

Comment by Dwane Eugene Kirkland UCC 1-207 on June 9, 2019 at 7:25am

_____________________________________

Plaintiff

Claimed Beneficiary

:Nancy-Lee :Prather

U.C.C. 1-207

1-308 w/o prejudice

All Rights Reserved

_____________________

Court ID TK-2017 862

Ticket No. _________________

BILL OF ATTAINDER

BILL OF PAIN

*****

Defendant’s

STATE OF MONTANA- CORPORATION

JUDGES:_Steven Bolstad, Lee Leveque, substitute

OFFICER_Smith -BADGE# 323 _OFFICER _Bowen BADGE# 421_____

ATTORNEYS Neil Anthon, Cassidy Blomgren:_Prosecutors____________

address_PO. Box 5021

Great Falls, Montana 59403

Phone: 406 455 8449

Grounds for dismissal

#1. Nancy Lee Prather request the prosecuting Attorney that has the burden of proof. I request a legal lawful determination of jurisdiction.

U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Five: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous, crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service, in time of War, or public danger; nor shall any person be subject, for the same offense, to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.

U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Six: In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense.

#2. Nancy Lee Prather Request to the State to claim the recourse under the Constitution at all levels- state and federal - Furthermore claim to be the beneficiary of the Constitution for the record.

Nancy Lee Prather request that all who took the oath of office to protect his rights and all provisions that he is entitled to under the Constitutional contract he now claims.

If rights are not protected from those who are to know the law, and failure to protect is a criminal charge -

According to {Title 18 US 241,242,and 1626} and if they due fail – if upon conviction you are subject to a fine of 10,000 and 10 years in prison- and if any theft results-

life in prison. According to law- one can be sued under{Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983,Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986}-Clearly states that violators can get sued- anyone can get sued judges lawyers and even grannies-

Additional findings and discovery-Owen v Independence 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 1398: (1982) Main v Thiboutot 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502: (1982)- no deprivation under color of law.

#3 Nancy Lee Prather now to inform the prosecuting attorney of the court -for the record.

She did not consent to unconstitutional acts listed in the complaint or affidavit. A bill of attainder or a writ of assist demanding money because of a claimed unconstitutional act brought upon the plaintiff- from the listed police officer and delegated powers of all oath takers.

Under the Constitutional protections of the supreme law that he now claimed under the {Article 6 paragraph 2}{Article 1 section 9 and 10 clearly states no bill of a attainer}

#4 Nancy Lee Prather Request to inform by writing and timely manner to the state clerk recorder administration for secure records filed- this record and all claims to no consent to any unknown contract- except the Constitution in harmony. Let the claim be submitted to a candid administration and the common court for his own records.

COLLECTED FACTS

Due to the fact of no victim or property damage or elements of a actual crime or any negligence proven in a court of law. Nancy Lee Prather

believes beyond A REASONABLE DOUBT since no affidavit was filed or any probable cause. (AND THAT HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO REQUEST FOR THE VICTIMS TO COME FORWARD DURING DUE PROCESS)

The officer Smith BADGE#323 & Bower Badge3# 421 intent of actions to fish for creating a crime against the plaintiff. Officer did clearly try to create a crime against the plaintiff- According to law.

No state shall create a basic fundamental right into a crime- and justify it and diminish rights- who says so ? {Miller /v US, 230 F 2d 486 ,489} with no injured party a complaint is invalid on its face {Gibson v. Boyle,139 Ariz. 512}

Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative though it had never been passed . Conflict - no victim nor property damage. None can come forward to be questioned pertaining to the matter.

US V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty- Nancy Lee Prather is using the constitution and supreme court cases.

16th Andrews prudent second section 97 says that it shall be interpreted in favor because Nancy Lee Prather is clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of rights and property.

Witness by Notary does not alter status.

Montana State )

Cascade County ) Jurat

On this ______day of June, 2019, the woman Nancy Lee Prather, known to me or has proven to me satisfactorily did visit and having been duly sworn and is of legal age did autograph this Affidavit for the purpose stated.

All Rights Reserved, without prejudice

By: ____________________________

Notary Signature__________________________

My Commission Expires _____________

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.(Added Pub. L. 87–748, § 1(a), Oct. 5, 1962, 76 Stat. 744.Third party/Over-watch, spc/Kirkland/ Hamilton Mt – SISTER STATES IN HARMONY-Assisting-406-369-0482 officerkirkland@icloud.com /civil records class/A#

Comment by Edward Jay Robin on June 9, 2019 at 6:59am

Folks we all got taught to write in grade 1 and 2..Grannar in english is upper lower case...When you see all caps being used thats called GLOSSA it is a dead language used to represent corporate law jurisdiction..The US us a debtor corporation who has assumpsit contact over all of it's registrants. The US is a person of law. The King James Bible tells you that if you respect persons your a sinner. The whole of the assumed jurisdiction the debtor US corp has over it's citizens of registry is contractual by nature and fiduciary generally accpted principals of accounting via surety for security.  When we signed up we put our bodies up for surety by pledge that we would become debtors ourselves called Constitutors .This is all according to Leviticus 25:44-50 when in junne 1933 the US went into receivership.  This is all about us ignoring God;s law when he said to not add to it ot bow to those who did in Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32,,

For those of you who got scammed by the Pulpit reading of Romans 13 please go read Ezra 7:23-26 to see which ministers your supposed to be submitting to as the vampires your registered with are not the same..Matthew 15:9 calls to you!!   What thinkest thou Simon???   Was notrLeviticus 18:3-4 enough??

© 2019   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service