The Myth of Marbury v Madison kirkland breaks it down******* trump baby

Marbury v. Madison : 5 US 137 (1803):
“No provision of the Constitution is designed to be without effect,” “Anything that is in conflict is
null and void of law”, “Clearly, for a secondary law to come in conflict with the supreme Law was illogical,
for certainly, the supreme Law would prevail over all other laws and certainly our forefathers had intended
that the supreme Law would be the bases of all law and for any law to come in conflict would be null and
void of law, it would bare no power to enforce, in would bare no obligation to obey, it would purport to
settle as if it had never existed, for unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not
from the date so branded in an open court of law, no courts are bound to uphold it, and no Citizens are
bound to obey it. It operates as a near nullity or a fiction of law.”
If any statement, within any law, which is passed, is unconstitutional, the whole law is unconstitutional by
Marbury v. Madison.
Shephard’s Citations:
A group of reporters that go through and keep track of all court cases that have come before the
courts, especially the Supreme Court and they clarify, before the court, all the cases. All cases which
have cited Marbury v. Madison case, to the Supreme Court has not ever been over turned. See
Shephard’s Citation of Marbury v. Madison.

Many people believe that Marbury v. Madison established the Supreme Court as the sole, exclusive and final authority of what the Constitution says and means.
According to this myth the Supreme Court’s opinions are the law of the land – never to be questioned by anybody ever again.
People who believe in this myth say that Chief Justice John Marshall made this the case through his own opinion in Marbury.
But Marshall said no such thing. Ever.
Dwane kirkland facts***************************
This is the way i read it ans study it********************************
Discovery and the facts by Kirkland *******************************
Yes the agreement between the states in order to be contract and in harmony , marbury v Madison states , yes there is a supreme law of the states , as long as the supreme law does not conflict with the supreme law of the land, any conflict at a state and federal level is not in harmony, so the supreme law has to be in harmony.
Its really very simple. so when supreme law is made and there is a conflict it shall not be a law- it shall be repugnant at all levels and void at all levels- and if anyone obeys or enforces conflicting law is committing a crime .
To under this you got peel the constructive fraud back all its layers. and you must look into the line of secession and the enabling clauses to really under stand. but ignorant law makers are the problem they have no clue of harmony and conflict.
Dwane Eugene Kirkland U.C.C 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice
On Jun 28, 2018, at 06:17 PM, Tenth Amendment Center <> wrote:

Views: 92


You need to be a member of Constitution Club to add comments!

Join Constitution Club

© 2020   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service