Invite Your Friends to Join the Constitution Club
Click Here

Keith Broaders
1230 N Street #510
Sacramento, California 95814
Phone (916) 399-4881




Claimed Beneficiary
Ryan Simmions U.C.C. 1-207
1-308 w/o prejudice
5814 lost creek
San Antonio Texas, 78247

Ticket Number 1865565-1




JUDGE __________________

Grounds for dismissal
#1 Ryan Simmions request the prosecuting Attorney that has the burden of proof. I request a legal lawful determination of jurisdiction.
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Five: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous, crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service, in time of War, or public danger; nor shall any person be subject, for the same offense, to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled, in any criminal case, to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.
U.S. Constitution, Bill of Rights, Article Six: In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law; and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of Counsel for his defense.
#2 Ryan Simmions Request to the State to claim the recourse under the Constitution at all levels- state and federal - Furthermore claim to be the beneficiary of the Constitution for the record. Ryan Simmions request that all who took the oath of office to protect his rights and all provisions that he is entitled to under the Constitutional contract he now claims.
If rights are not protected from those who are to know the law, and failure to protect is a criminal charge -
According to {Title 18 US 241,242,and 1626} and if they due fail – if upon conviction you are subject to a fine of 10,000 and 10 years in prison- and if any theft results-
life in prison. According to law- one can be sued under{Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983,Sec. 1985, and Sec. 1986}-Clearly states that violators can get sued- anyone can get sued judges lawyers and even grannies-
Additional findings and discovery-Owen v Independence 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 1398: (1982) Main v Thiboutot 100 Vol. Supreme Court Reports. 2502: (1982)- no deprivation under color of law.
#3 Ryan Simmions to inform the prosecuting attorney of the court -for the record.
He did not consent to unconstitutional acts listed in the complaint or affidavit. A bill of attainder or a writ of assist demanding money because of a claimed unconstitutional act brought upon the plaintiff- from the listed police officer and delegated powers of all oath takers.
Under the Constitutional protections of the supreme law that he now claimed under the {Article 6 paragraph 2}{Article 1 section 9 and 10 clearly states no bill of a attainer}
#4 Ryan Simmions Request to inform by writing and timely manner to the state clerk recorder administration for secure records filed- this record and all claims to no consent to any unknown contract- except the Constitution in harmony. Let the claim be submitted to a candid administration and the common court for his own records.
Due to the fact of no victim or property damage or elements of a actual crime or any negligence proven in a court of law. Ryan Simmions believes beyond A REASONABLE DOUBT since no affidavit was filed or any probable cause. (AND THAT HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO REQUEST FOR THE VICTIMS TO COME FORWARD DURING DUE PROCESS)
The OFFICER JAMES WENDE -BADGE ___ intent of actions to fish for creating a crime against the plaintiff. Officer did clearly try to create a crime against the plaintiff- According to law.
No state shall create a basic fundamental right into a crime- and justify it and diminish rights- who says so ? {Miller /v US, 230 F 2d 486 ,489} with no injured party a complaint is invalid on its face {Gibson v. Boyle,139 Ariz. 512}
Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation as inoperative though it had never been passed . Conflict - no victim nor property damage. None can come forward to be questioned pertaining to the matter.
US V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty- Ryan Simmions is using the constitution and supreme court cases.
16th Andrews prudent second section 97 says that it shall be interpreted in favor because Ryan Simmions is clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of rights and property.

Views: 22


You need to be a member of Constitution Club to add comments!

Join Constitution Club

© 2020   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service