Dwane Eugene kirkland UCC 1-207
Thank you judges, I have listen to the cases, and I have come to the conclusion , no matter what the statues say, they either are in conflict or not. however I believe by my opinion to keep it to the common thought from a lower communication. love all of you*****************
The sentences should always be a calculated right in the beginning of being put in jail. if he is in violation of committing another crime then he shall be charged for the additional crime, unless there was intent of violations of any provisions guaranteed to the individual.
However, it would not be legal because of the violations of the 8th amendment the provision to be excessive , unless it weight of evil intent has harmed and has more victims.
My opinion is to be fair and impartial unless there is a mala insane crime, with a victim or property damage.
I believe that if you locked up it should be calculated AS THE DAY THEY ARE PUT IN JAIL AND the defendant SHOULD BE PUT BACK INF OR THE REMAINING OF THE SENTECE, THEN THE ADDED SENTENCE FOR THE NEW CRIME, TO RUN IN CORRILATION.
A statute or code must be in harmony and not in conflict with any provisions, according to law actual , if a conflict is or in connection any clause any part is void and null, and is not bound to any office or enforcement.
Thank you, john marshal stated , paragraph phrases and repugnant secondary law would be illogical. a provisions should not be violated and 16th amurj prudent section 97 98 and many more says the beneficiary of the constitution should have liberal favor. byers v united states say no rights can be diminished or denied if set in motion to the conflict of the statues.
Crimes have to have elements of a crime, and if revoked for a victimless crime would be a conflict of actual law. if revoked one should or shall refinished the remaining sentenced, and then either charged or not for the revocation the elements of the intent of the evil crime, or none evil crime or infraction.
No secondary law trumps a actual law. no infraction trumps the actual law, no secondary cod , policies that violated actual law.
Marbury v Madison US say clear in the final disposition of john marshal - any law in conflict or repugnant or infringement or encroachment, then it void null, and the supreme law trumps all other laws.
Dwane Eugene Kirkland U.C.C 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice