Representation - Articles 3.0 - Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America2024-03-28T15:09:03Zhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/articles/feed/category/RepresentationRepresentation - Shall Not Exceed Notice - Pennsylvaniahttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/articles/representation-shall-not-exceed-notice-pennsylvania2021-08-20T08:00:03.000Z2021-08-20T08:00:03.000ZMorton IXhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/members/MortonIX<div><p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:24pt;">Shall Not Exceed Notice</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Dear State Representative ___________________________,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">This notice is to inform you of the following problem. Our new Congressional District maps are going to be published soon. These maps MUST be made to reflect the requirements set forth in <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>, wherein; <strong><em>"The number of Representatives SHALL NOT EXCEED one for every thirty Thousand,.."</em></strong><em> (1/30,000). </em>The problem is that <strong><em>"exceed"</em></strong> is being interpreted as <strong><em>"no more than"</em></strong>. This flies in the face of the very definition of "exceed" AND the original intent as written in Federalist #56, wherein;<strong><em> "Allowing to this case the weight which is due to it, and comparing it with the House of Representatives as above explained, it seems to give the fullest assurance that</em></strong><em> A REPRESENTATIVE FOR EVERY THIRTY THOUSAND INHABITANTS <strong>will render the latter both a safe and competent guardian of the interests which will be confided to it."</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"><em> </em></span><span style="font-size:14pt;">In addition, it must be taken into consideration, that which the Founding Fathers were protecting against in drafting this restriction. It was intended that this ratio of 1/30,000 be adhered to <strong><em>"as near as is practicable"</em></strong>. It was also intended that this rational number, 1/30,000 should not vary UP OR DOWN! Why? If you extrapolate to the extreme in EITHER DIRECTION you will see why.</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">Here's a graph that will illustrate this comparison;</span><span style="font-size:18.6667px;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">(Pure Dictatorship) (Representative Republic) (Democracy)</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;"><strong>1/infinity</strong> <--------------<strong>1/761,000</strong>--------------- <strong>1/30,000</strong> -------------------------------><strong>1/1</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">(Current Average) </span><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">If one <strong>exceeds</strong> that number in one direction one gets a ratio of <strong>1/1</strong>. This translates as one Representative in the House for every inhabitant, that being HIM or HERSELF! This a COMPLETELY UNDESIRABLE form of government. This is a PURE DEMOCRACY, (Mob Rule). This was obviously not the intent of the founding, as we are guaranteed<strong><em> "a Republican form of Government."</em></strong> in <strong>Article IV, Section 4,</strong> of the U.S. Constitution.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">If one exceeds the ratio of 1/30,000 in the other direction, one gets <strong>1/infinity</strong>. This translates to one Representative for EVERYONE. This is a PURE DICTATORSHIP, as can be seen in countries like North Korea, where one person, (Kim Jong-Un), speaks for the entire country. This is also a COMPLETELY UNDESIRABLE form of government. This too, was and is to be avoided at all cost. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">So, since they were not only trying to create a <strong>Representative Republic</strong>, but also trying to avoid a <strong>Pure Democracy</strong> AND/OR a <strong>Pure Dictatorship</strong>, it was decided that A FIXED RATIO (1/30,000), would be set in stone in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. That ratio was set at <strong><em>"a Representative for every thirty thousand inhabitants"</em></strong>, as explained in <strong>Federalist #56.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Therefore, it is now obvious to any reasonable individual, that <strong><em>"shall not exceed"</em></strong> is to be STRICTLY INTERPRETED as "SHALL NOT MOVE IN EITHER DIRECTION". There is no ambiguity in this requirement.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">If you claim to be in compliance with your <strong>Oath of Office</strong>, it is now required of you to follow the restrictions of <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>. This means that with a population of <strong>13,011,844 people</strong>, the <strong>State of Pennsylvania</strong> would now qualify for <strong>434 seats</strong> in the House of Representatives. With the official data indicating apportionment of only <strong>17 seats</strong>, there would now be a deficit of <strong>417 vacant seats</strong> in the Pennsylvania Congressional House.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Therefore, the State legislature is immediately required to <strong><em>"issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies."</em></strong> Your response IS REQUIRED. Compliance with these requirements is not optional or subject to the unconstitutional Reapportionment Act of 1929. The requirement to fill these vacancies is subject only to <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 2, Clause 4,</strong> of the Constitution for the united States of America.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">This letter should be treated as an official notice to you to perform under your Oath of Office. The people's voice MUST be properly represented in Congress. This is not only proper, but is REQUIRED BY LAW! <strong><em>"The number of Representatives SHALL NOT EXCEED one for every thirty Thousand,..". </em></strong>If this requirement is not complied with, the House of Representatives will be in violation and without a quorum. This is an unacceptable condition which you MUST now move to correct. <strong>Pennsylvania Legislature</strong> is now REQUIRED to issue <strong>417 writs of Election</strong> to fill these Vacancies.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"><strong> </strong></span><span style="font-size:14pt;">Sincerely, Your Constituent,</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">_________________________________</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span></p></div>What Revolution Looks Likehttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/articles/what-revolution-looks-like2021-08-10T18:49:33.000Z2021-08-10T18:49:33.000ZMorton IXhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/members/MortonIX<div><p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:24pt;">The Time Has Come</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:18pt;">This is a Call to Action!</span></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If you're wondering what I'm talking about, here it is. We are at the point where We The People must now do something instead of waiting for our Representatives to keep their Oath of Office. There are 3 things that a</span><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">ll of the States in our Union </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">must do IMMEDIATELY!</span></p>
<ol>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">Perform a forensic audit of the November 3rd, 2020 Election without delay!</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">Return to compliance with the Law as written in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, u.S. Constitution, wherein it is REQUIRED that; "The number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand,..". Hence there shall be NO HOUSE DISTRICT in the u.S. larger than thirty thousand inhabitants, give or take one Representative.</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">Form a State approved, Constitutional Militia IN EVERY STATE! Without fail and without delay!</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">Any time there is an unlawful act by government YOU JUST SAY NO!</span></li>
</ol>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If you were wondering what to do first, NOW YOU KNOW! Everyone can now rest their minds as to the solution to freedom and a return to a Constitutional Representative Republic. Nuff Said! Who's Ready?</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:24pt;">Morton IX</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">Anybody still lost?</span><br /> </span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">Call Me! Leave a Msg. and I will guide you!</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">(724) 217-6460</span></p></div>Representation - Shall not Exceed Letterhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/articles/representation-shall-not-exceed-letter2021-07-03T12:03:20.000Z2021-07-03T12:03:20.000ZMorton IXhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/members/MortonIX<div><p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:24pt;">Shall Not Exceed Notice</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Dear State Representative ___________________,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">I have informed you of the following problem in the past. If not, consider this to be your first and final notice. Our new congressional district maps are going to be published soon. These maps MUST reflect the requirements set forth in <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>, wherein; <strong><em>"The number of Representatives SHALL NOT EXCEED one for every thirty Thousand,.."</em></strong><em> </em>(1/30,000)<em>. </em>The problem is that <strong><em>"exceed"</em></strong> is being interpreted as <strong><em>"no more than"</em></strong>. This flies in the face of the very definition of "exceed" AND the original intent as written in Federalist #56, wherein;<strong><em> "Allowing to this case the weight which is due to it, and comparing it with the House of Representatives as above explained, it seems to give the fullest assurance that</em></strong><em> A REPRESENTATIVE FOR EVERY THIRTY THOUSAND INHABITANTS <strong>will render the latter both a safe and competent guardian of the interests which will be confided to it."</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"><em> </em></span><span style="font-size:14pt;">In addition, it must be taken into consideration, that which the Founding Fathers were protecting against, in drafting this restriction. It was intended that this ratio of 1/30,000 be adhered to <strong><em>"as near as is practicable"</em></strong>. It was also intended that this rational number, 1/30,000 should not vary UP OR DOWN! Why? If you extrapolate to the extreme in EITHER DIRECTION you will see why.</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">Here's a graph that will illustrate this comparison;</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;"><strong>1/infinity</strong> <----------------------------- <strong>1/30,000</strong> -------------------------------><strong>1/1</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"> (Pure Dictatorship) (Representative Republic) (Democracy)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">If one exceeds that number in one direction one gets a ratio of 1/1. This translates as one Representative in the House for every inhabitant, that being HIM or HERSELF! This a COMPLETELY UNDESIRABLE form of government. This is a PURE DEMOCRACY. This was obviously not the intent of the founding, as we are guaranteed<strong><em> "a Republican form of Government."</em></strong> in Article IV, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">If one exceeds the ratio of 1/30,000 in the other direction, one gets 1/infinity. This translates to one Representative for EVERYONE. This is a PURE DICTATORSHIP, as can be seen in countries like North Korea, where one guy, (Kim Jong-Un), speaks for the entire country. This is also a COMPLETELY UNDESIRABLE form of government. This too, was and is to be avoided at all cost. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">So, since they were not only trying to create a <strong>Republic</strong>, but also trying to avoid a <strong>pure Democracy</strong> AND/OR a <strong>pure Dictatorship</strong>, it was decided that A FIXED RATIO (1/30,000), would be set in stone in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. That ratio was set at <strong><em>"a Representative for every thirty thousand inhabitants"</em></strong>, as explained in <strong>Federalist #56.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Therefore, it is now obvious to any reasonable individual, that <strong><em>"shall not exceed"</em></strong> is to be STRICTLY INTERPRETED as "SHALL NOT MOVE IN EITHER DIRECTION". There is no ambiguity in this requirement.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">If you claim to be in compliance with your Oath of Office, it is now required of you to follow the restrictions of <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>. This means that with a population of ________________ people, the State of ________________ would now qualify for _______ seats in the House of Representatives. With the official data indicating apportionment of only ______ seats, there would now be a deficit of <strong>______ vacant seats</strong> in the ________________ Congressional House.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">Therefore, the State legislature is immediately required to <strong><em>"issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies."</em></strong> Your response IS REQUIRED. Compliance with these requirements is not optional or subject to the unconstitutional Reapportionment Act of 1929. The requirement to fill these vacancies is subject only to <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3 and Article I, Section 2, Clause 4,</strong> of the Constitution for the united States of America.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"><strong> </strong></span><span style="font-size:14pt;">Sincerely, Your Constituent,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span><span style="font-size:14pt;">_________________________________</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;"> </span></p></div>Oath of Office - Letter to Your State Rephttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/articles/oath-of-office-letter-to-your-state-rep2021-05-31T09:35:39.000Z2021-05-31T09:35:39.000ZMorton IXhttps://constitutionclub.ning.com/members/MortonIX<div><p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:24pt;">"A Republican Form..."</span></p>
<p style="text-align:center;"><span style="font-size:14pt;"><strong><em>"If you can keep it"</em></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">It's about time we called a Spade a Spade. Either we believe we are doing our job, or we must admit that we have failed in that endevour. If you are a Representative in the Republican Party and you have taken an oath to protect and defend the Constitution FOR the united States of America, then to keep that oath in today's world you will have to make some stark changes. What changes? To answer that we need simply ask a few questions, such as;</span></p>
<ul>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If <strong>Article VI, clause 2</strong> makes the Constitution <strong><em>"the Law of the Land,.."</em></strong> then why are we stuck with Admiralty Courts under an Administrative Venue?</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If <strong>Article V</strong> protects the States from involuntarily giving up their Suffrage in the Senate, to whit; <em><strong>"...that no State, without its Consent shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate"</strong></em>, then why is any States which voted AGAINST the 17th Amendment still subject to it, <strong><em>",..without its Consent,.."</em></strong>?</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>, says that <em>"The number of Representatives, <strong>shall not exceed</strong> One for every thirty Thousand,.."</em>, and Federalist #56 solidifies this with the statement; <strong><em>"...that a Representative for every thirty thousand Inhabitants will render the latter,</em></strong><em> </em>[the House of Representatives],<strong><em> both a safe and competent guardian of the interests that will be be confided to it."</em></strong></span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">If <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 4</strong>, instructs that the States are bound by the requirement that, <strong><em>"When vacancies happen in the Representation from any State, the Executive Authority thereof shall issue Writs of Election to fill such Vacancies."</em></strong>, then why is Pennsylvania<span style="text-decoration:underline;">,</span> not immediately issuing 408 Writs of Election to fill the existing Vacancies that we know exist, from the requirements of <em><strong>"One for every thirty Thousand,.."</strong></em> in <strong>Article I</strong>?</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">And Last but not Least, WHEN are you ACTUALLY going to keep your Oath to protect and DEFEND the Constitution FOR the united States of America?</span></li>
<li style="text-align:left;"><span style="font-size:14pt;">Why does the federal government keep <strong>stealing from the American people</strong> through inflation/deflation, major taxation and raping retirement funds like <strong>Social Security</strong>?</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">As you certainly know by now, this is just the proverbial "tip of the iceberg". We the People have dropped the ball and I'm asking you to have the courage to pick it up and start running. You do that and I will personally make sure that We the People have your back. I am committed to MY military Oath and you took the same one I did. Let's get moving. It's way past time for a COMPLETE forensic audit of the voting and election procedures IN EVERY STATE, on November 3rd, 2020. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:14pt;">It is high time we;</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Drop all ten Planks of the <strong>Communist Manifesto.</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Return to strict adherence to all ten Amendments in the <strong>Bill of Rights</strong> instead.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Toss the <strong>U.N.</strong> out on they're ass.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Stop donating to the <strong>IMF.</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Eliminate the <strong>Federal Reserve Bank</strong>. Their time is up. Revoke they're charter.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Completely <strong>close down the IRS</strong>. Period! They can all find a job with the Border Patrol.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:18.6667px;">Repeal the <strong>16th Amendment.</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Declare the <strong>17th Amendment</strong> null and void. It stands in violation of Article V protections.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Follow the restrictions of <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 3</strong>, and</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Have EVERY State issue writs of election under the instructions in <strong>Article I, Section 2, Clause 4</strong>, to fill the existing <strong>vacancies</strong> in the House of Representatives.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Declare ALL legislation passed by ANY Congress <strong>after 1840,</strong> null and void due to operating <strong>withot a quorum.</strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Declare <strong>"the Militia"</strong> Constitutionally required <strong style="font-size:18.6667px;">under Article I, Section 8, Clause 15 </strong>and begin to form command posts, armories and qualified Citizens, ready to <strong><em>"...execute the Laws of the Union, supress Insurections and repel Invasions;..".</em></strong></span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Return the united States to <strong><em>"a Republican form of Government"</em></strong> under <strong>Article IV, Section 4</strong>.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Return the <strong>power of the courts</strong> to the people and make them Costitutional. Declare the <strong>BAR unlawful</strong>. The British Accredidation Registry is NOT AMERICAN. They are BRITISH!</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:14pt;">Make sure that it is understood that the power to convene a <strong>Grand Jury</strong> belongs to We the People; average, everyday, ordinary people and only the people. Not ANYONE in Government office!</span></li>
</ul></div>