Monday, March 10th, 2014
Independence
Our current government is revealing itself to be the total antithesis to freedom, independence and sovereignty in America. Now “America’s chickens are comin’ home to roost.”
In the opinion of Ralph Reiland, Associate Professor of Economics @ Robert Morris University, “We’re all going to be sitting in the dark before it’s over.”
In my opinion all existing homes should convert to a back-up generator system, a fuel supply tank, and a water cistern and green water systems. Every new house should be required to be built with these improvements in mind, if for no other reason than to handle short or even long term weather emergencies. But more importantly, to help secure our freedoms which are based in independence from the need for any help, especially in emergencies.
Government help means government control and that is the opposite of freedom. Our founding fathers were fully aware of the concept of the individual in charge of his own life, liberty and happiness and the importance of defining these things with individual sovereignty and the freedom to travel at the core.
Our founding fathers knew the danger of trading freedom for security:
“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
--- Samuel Adams
"The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence,"
--- John Adams
"The principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale,"
--- Thomas Jefferson
"If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify."
--- Alexander Hamilton
Or in other words, If you push us far enough, we have every right and even a sworn duty to push back by whatever means are appropriate, including, but not limited to, the “right to bear arms” – 2nd Amendment.
Comments?
Comments
strike section 3. that's a real issue cause they will just find another way to keep the IRS collecting the coin
Wolf,
Ref. Sec. 3. You can't take that power away. The Congress was given the power to enforce the 16th Amendment, therefore they must be the ones to un-enforce it. There is no new power in there implied or otherwise, that would allow Congress to tax anyone in any way.
Ele G,
The reason for repealing the 16th Amendment should be clear. Because it exists? Because it was fraudulently declared ratified? Because it is being used by the IRS to justify their existence? It doesn't matter that it has been declared by the SCOTUS to "creates no new power of taxation...". It doesn't matter that it was fraudulently passed. It has been used to enforce the President's will many times. As long as we allow it to go unchallenged or continue unchanged, we accept all of their fraud. That's why we need to repeal that Amendment first. For precedence in these matters see the 21st Amendment which undoes the 18th.
I. Cole,
Sorry to burst your bubble but I wrote this piece. But thanks for your vote of confidence. I assume you have read The Law That Never Was - Bill Benson? A book on how the 16th Amendment was never lawfully ratified.
Jon Roland,
I know you're a wise and educated man. That said,
Thanx for the feedback, but I must make at least one point. These "Draft Amendments" are not ACTUALLY Amendments, but in their own words: "These should be regarded as short position statements on constitutional construction."
Its great that you have the wisdom to see the flaws in my "attempt to draft a constitutional amendment. Well-intentioned, but largely clueless...".
In that vain I would welcome your version . So far I don't see ANYONE including your precious website and their, may I say quite complicated, "Drafts" actually giving it a go as to the EXACT language necessary to write an ACTUAL Amendment.
In that regard, you might as well look at the rest of my "incompetent" Amendments. I can email them to you if you wish.
Hear, hear Steve.
Carl,
"FDR's declared bankruptcy and proclamations 2038, 2039 and 2040."
You are exactly correct. I know what these Proclamations say. They are onerous at best. They are a Declaration of Mixed War on the American people. Socialism and Fascism are at their core.
Bruce. You need to read some more. They did not cover everything and you're not even looking at the Organic Constitution FOR the PEOPLE of the united states of America. Your referencing the wrong document. Believe me Jon Roland would disagree that its all covered. He seems to think there is room for a whole crap-load of corrections and additions. See his comments here.
That's all good Jon,
I agree, but proposing that an amendment be written is only the beginning. Let's actually write the Amendments. Like I said I welcome all input, good or bad. Maybe right or maybe wrong. Either way, all views warrant inspection and consideration. Thanx
you can't tax a corporation and think that we the people won't pay the tax in the end!! Our income tax would disappear and a gallon of milk would be $100. We need to limit the size and scope of government!
-
1
-
2
-
3
of 3 Next