In the center of the main page you will see articles and/or videos posted by Keith Broaders and Morton IX. Also posted on the Main Page you will have access to recent blogs and forums. The membership roster is also postef on the Main Page.
In the column on the right you will have access to sources of alternative news with Gary Franchi, Lou Dobbs and Judge Andrew Napolitano.
You will also have access to "The Principles of Liberty", "The Philosophy of Liberty" and "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat You can also go to Constitution Facts and see how much you know about the Constitution.
In the Gold Bar at the top of this page you will see a number of tabs that will take you to video presentations on various topics.
PRESIDENTIAL POLLS: Most national polls only ask about 1000 people and claim that this is a representative sample. Even if the sample is equal of men and women in all 50 states in urban, suburban and…Continue
"Our U.S.A. Constitution is based on Common Law, which is rarely used now. Common law is mostly not in writing. It is abstract legal concepts. Derived from principles rather than rules. It uses malum in se (= wrong or evil in itself), as opposed to…"
"Individually we are weak, but collectively we can move mountains. Every member of the Constitution Club has a FREE website. You simply type in http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/Your Name and you will be able to share your opinions, articles,…"
"History of the Democratic Party:
It is believed that the Democratic Party started with Andrew Jackson in 1828. He was called a “jackass” by opponents and in the 1880’s the jackass became the symbol of the Democratic Party. …"
"For voting/democracy to work, the majority must rule/win. This is how Robert's Rules of Order works and how a group of people decide what they will do together. The Electoral College is no different EXCEPT that the votes are based on STATE…"
"Please realize that there are 2 meanings of the word "democracy" - people voting and the political system where there is little to no government other than the people who must vote for everything or nearly everything. The video above makes…"
"What do Donald Trump, Jesse Ventura, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ronald Reagan, Steve Largent, Sonny Bono, Clint Eastwood, Fred Grandy and incumbents have in common? Name Fame. In other words, their names were famous, but voters knew little to nothing…"
"Does any of this information about Trump tell us how he will govern? Or whether he will comply with our constitution? Hell no. This is just to get people to support him. As if Republicans needed encouragement to support a Republican. They support…"
"Why the Right won’t fight
Conservatives/right-wingers/individualists like freedom from control, especially from government control, especially unconstitutional central government control. This may be because we are…"
PRESIDENTIAL POLLS: Most national polls only ask about 1000 people and claim that this is a representative sample. Even if the sample is equal of men and women in all 50 states in urban, suburban and rural areas; 1000+-people cannot represent an entire nation. Most polls are said to have a margin of error (MOE) of at least +-3% which is a total of 6%. In this case, candidates within 6% of each other are considered a “statistical tie”. The MOE is based on the methodology used, NOT based on…See More
" The 16th Amendment (federal income tax) to the U.S.A. Constitution was never properly ratified. Visit www.thelawthat neverwas.com . Rather, it was declared ratified by Philander Knox (President Wilson’s Secretary of…"
"The BAR has and maintains the monopoly over "legal" matters. This is an antitrust issue and the Federal Trade COMMIssion should fix this and they have a complaint form to do it. Please provide here and now additions to the list below of…"
"I agree with your last line. The rest of what you said does not state what part you disagree with. You need to deal with Bouvier, not me because I quoted him.
Civil refers to government. Forget government. Our natural/human rights are what matters…"
"Civil rights are given by government to people. Natural/human rights are part of nature and are used when 2 or more people interact. If you were the only person on Earth, then rights are useless.
Common law is actually based on human traditions and…"
Individually we are weak, but collectively we can move mountains. Every member of the Constitution Club has a FREE website. You simply type in http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/Your Name and you will be able to share your opinions, articles, videos or virtually anything else to promote the cause of freedom.
You can create your own network of friends by simply inviting other members of the Constitution Club to become your friend. You can join your county group to network with people in your community that share your passion for liberty.
You can also communicate with the over 4,000 current members of the Constitution Club by using tools on your personal website. All of these services are provided FREE of charge to our members. I strongly encourage you to take advantage of the tools and call me if you need help in your efforts to promote the restoration of our Constitutional Republic. My number is 961-260-7711
'You can also use this website to promote the patriotic organizations such as Oath Keepers, Tea Party Patriots, America Again, Tenth Amendment Center, or any other liberty minded group.
I never said I was completely opposed to a convention to discuss potential amendments. My point is why would states not know what amendment(s) they want and then meet to talk about what they have not already decided? They should, right now, know what amendments they want to work on. I also do not trust politicians, political organizations nor delegates to a con. con. I also said that I might support a con. con. if a specific topic ONLY was going to be the subject of a possible amendment.
It is NOT OK for any branch of government to do what they want and I never implied this. What does this have to do with being caucious of a con. con.? Remember what happened to the Article of Confederation that were supposed to be altered in 1787? It can happen again.
If you are opposed to having a convention to discuss potential amendments, does that mean that you think that it is OK for the three branches of government to do whatever they want without accountablility?