"Individually we are weak, but collectively we can move mountains. Every member of the Constitution Club has a FREE website. You simply type in http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/Your Name and you will be able to share your opinions, articles,…"
"It’s election time again... according to the collectivist/liberal media. They have been talking about presidential candidates for months - mostly Marco Rubio and Hillary Clinton. Have either of them said they will run for president? No. Then…"
"I support improving our constitution, but how? There is a risk of leftists eliminating it or altering it to the point of creating a socialist political system. Most of our constitution is ignored now. So even if restrictions to government power were…"
"Now the RNC is opposed to a const. convention -
"RESOLUTION OPPOSING A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION
Article V of the Constitution of the United States authorizes the convening of a Convention for proposing Amendments, now frequently…"
"I never said I was completely opposed to a convention to discuss potential amendments. My point is why would states not know what amendment(s) they want and then meet to talk about what they have not already decided? They should, right now, know…"
"The case against political parties
1. Parties pressure “their own” to vote for candidates and bills that may not be constitutional. National headquarters also affect grassroots.
2. Politicians represent the party, not the people, because…"
"Asking "what is a sovereign?" is an OK response, but taking the 5th (remain silent) is safer and I see it recommended more and more. I used it with a cop after I gave him a written notice that I am a sovereign recorded with the California…"
"Cops have been abusive lately. They harass, violate privacy, steal and use deadly force. Deadly force is never needed. Rubber bullets, pepper spray, flash-bang grenades and Tasers can stop a criminal. The cure to out of control cops - wear cameras.…"
"THE PROBLEMS WITH POLITICAL PARTIES:
1. Parties pressure “their own” to vote for candidates and bills that may not be constitutional for party unity reasons, not lawful or useful reasons. National headquarters influence the grassroots.…"
"Ronald: There is power in no party affiliation - 1. The other parties have less power because they have fewer voters voting by party. 2. More people registering as unaffiliated tells the parties people are mad at them and that they need to change to…"
"Marriage does not even have to be a "church topic". It is a private topic between 2 (or more) people and no government has any constitutional authority pertaining to marriage. The exception is if the couple have their marriage contract…"
"The Supreme Court ruled on DOMA constitutionally. There is NOTHING in our USA Constitution that provides for marriage, drugs, sex, education, gambling nor food. Therefore, the federal government dealing in any way on any of these subjects is…"
Individually we are weak, but collectively we can move mountains. Every member of the Constitution Club has a FREE website. You simply type in http://constitutionclub.ning.com/profile/Your Name and you will be able to share your opinions, articles, videos or virtually anything else to promote the cause of freedom.
You can create your own network of friends by simply inviting other members of the Constitution Club to become your friend. You can join your county group to network with people in your community that share your passion for liberty.
You can also communicate with the over 4,000 current members of the Constitution Club by using tools on your personal website. All of these services are provided FREE of charge to our members. I strongly encourage you to take advantage of the tools and call me if you need help in your efforts to promote the restoration of our Constitutional Republic. My number is 961-260-7711
'You can also use this website to promote the patriotic organizations such as Oath Keepers, Tea Party Patriots, America Again, Tenth Amendment Center, or any other liberty minded group.
I never said I was completely opposed to a convention to discuss potential amendments. My point is why would states not know what amendment(s) they want and then meet to talk about what they have not already decided? They should, right now, know what amendments they want to work on. I also do not trust politicians, political organizations nor delegates to a con. con. I also said that I might support a con. con. if a specific topic ONLY was going to be the subject of a possible amendment.
It is NOT OK for any branch of government to do what they want and I never implied this. What does this have to do with being caucious of a con. con.? Remember what happened to the Article of Confederation that were supposed to be altered in 1787? It can happen again.
If you are opposed to having a convention to discuss potential amendments, does that mean that you think that it is OK for the three branches of government to do whatever they want without accountablility?