American citizen
Signature, _________________________________
Claimed designated beneficiary. U.C.C. 1-207 1-308 w/o prejudice
10/11/2022 4:51:34 PM
Address: _________________________________________
FOR THE RECORDS
{IN THE INTREST OF JUSTICE}
****
Violator’s
1/ ________________________________
2/ ________________________________
3/ ________________________________
4/ ________________________________
5/ ________________________________
Not listed yet under investigation.
Notice of No jurisdiction and Notice to Dismiss
To whom it may Concern: ________________________________________________________________________________________
Regarding the Case Number: ____________ the plaintiff knows and understands guaranteed rights. The Fundamental Principle and Amendments Provisions Articles and Declarations of Rights at a State and Federal level. Even being under extreme Duress because of multiple due process violations.
In this special appearance the Plaintiff requests for this court under oath to protections of the Constitution at a state level and at a federal level.
Now comes the plaintiff, ______________________________ Protected by the supremacy clause of the United States of America in harmony. Article 6 paragraph 2. US Constitution.
As each state in harmony says the same thing. The plaintiff does not consent to any unknown contract regarding commerce commercial merchant or any other allegations by those operating under the color of law enforcing conflicting statutes codes and rules and proclamations.
Furthermore, any legislative fiat pursuant to fraud and the distinctive difference between real law v fake laws that conflict with the iron clad contract warranty for the plaintiff.
The claimed designated beneficiary according to law.
According to the last paragraph of the supremacy clause, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/tocs/a6_2.html
In the interest of justice and liberty for all
Due to the facts of no legal lawful determination of jurisdiction. This private person request and requires for an immediate Dismissal under common law jurisdiction to be construed to the Constitutions that are in harmony among the sister states of the Union. For the record asking the judge and the lawyers and attorneys and all parties involved for equity.
Or to bring forward full disclosure of any unknown contract the plaintiff agreed to and ask for a copy for records the bond a copy of the judges’ lawyers and all parties involved oath of office.
The delegated powers a copy of the delegated bond and insurance, as well as a copy of public contract to operate under the public acts.
We the people as witness for the plaintiff requests a copy and the disclosure of fiduciary omissions and errors paragraph in the insurance coverage and agents name and public information.
The plaintiff requests and requires the administration of justice and of the prosecuting attorney, to give a legal lawful determination of jurisdiction in the interest of justice. Or dismiss this matter so the plaintiff can seek life liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
And of all parties involved and of all institutions, in the matter of the merits the reflection of the latter.
1/ no contract and 2/ no jurisdiction and 3/ no reading of the Miranda warning and 4/ tricked by trickery scheme of waiving rights or forced 5/ and none proper venue 6/ being arrested for a non-jailable offence if applicable 7/ taken against ones will and 8/ illegally taken blood and collection of evidence if applicable.
9/ violations of the exclusionary rule and 10/ the chain of custody. 11/ no actual victim or the elements of a crime missing one of the main elements of a crime out of the four elements. 12/ no affidavit proper process 13/ no indictment 14/ not given full discovery
15 / not appointing a competent attorney to protect rights but refuses to communicate on invoking rights. 16/ enforcing bills of attainder and not full disclosure of contract forced by scare tactics by institutions involved 17/ violation of a speedy trial over 70 days and laches shall apply.
18/ bill of rights violations 1st, 4th , 5th , 6th , 7th , 8th , 9th , 10th , and wrapped up in all with the 14th amendment failure to protections of the law the equal protections of the law. Causing pain and suffering. Not just based on hearsay or trivalent beliefs.
After the legal/lawful determination of jurisdiction, the plaintiff requests and requires for the full disclosure of the undisclosed contract that supposedly agreed to those conflicts with the plaintiff iron clad contract the plaintiff ‘s warranty and Constitutional contract and no other.
The plaintiff asks for a Judge not connected to the case that has equity across the bench to order that the prosecuting attorney has no longer that 10 days to answer and to give legal / lawful determination of jurisdiction.
If necessary, that the proper venue which is an article 3 Court of Record may be attained. There also must also be a proper indictment or affidavit of an actual victim who has sworn that they were physically or personally harmed by the Plaintiff. There is none/
If not answered in a timely manner, then laches shall apply, and the matter should be closed. According to Federal Law, any matter that has not been to trial within 70 days is in violation of Constitutionally protected rights and the Article 3 Court of Record which is the right and proper venue. It’s already been more than enough time in this matter shall be closed.
If the court chooses to move forward without lawful/legal determination, then for the record it shall be placed into our court of record that your court is operating under the color of law. And shall appeal go forward for full disclosure of contract and the conflict of interest.
Titles of multiple crimes committed:
Attempted fishing to create a crime against the plaintiff for equity and without an actual victim or any claim of property damage from the victim. {Full report in a timely manner if requested for the record – see attachment of Affidavit of Pain and Suffering.} In the matter to counter claims and to hold all accountable for the violations that have been brought upon the plaintiff for the amount listed in documents and the record by Case law and criminal law. Estimated 300,000.00 three hundred thousand dollars time 3 not including pain and suffering.
Under:
{Titles 18 US 241,242, 2183 1628} {Title 42 US lawsuit cases 1980} {Full report in a timely manner} {Amount $10,000,000.00 per violations x 3, not including pain and suffering per violations proven in a court of law the proper venue or by peers. Plaintiff does not further want to obstruct the caseloads on the Docket or obstruct your equity collections of illegal bills of attainder collusion illegal seizure and due process violations that are running contrary to the bill of rights amendments at the state and federal levels. According to Article 6 paragraph 2, the last two sentences say that any so-called laws statutes codes proclamations police policies kings’ orders are all repugnant and are declared null and void according to Supreme Law of the land.
Article 1 sections 9, and 10 of a bill of attainder, or a bill of Pain claimed is in violation of a direct tax, a direct bill, infractions, illegal orders, illegal warrants, and any listed violations of committed acts of Constitutional violations against declarations of rights and Amendments and provisions and articles in the actual law contract- to date,
this matter – even though the pain suffering clearly explains. No reason to threat scare from prosecuting or appointed attorney to convince someone to force unknown contract by trickery stealthy governmental schemes, clearly extort for equity cannon ethic violations leverage to violate any other amendments provisions fundamental principles declarations of rights articles at all levels state and federal, no actual victim, no property damage, no real and true evidence of any crime other than fabrications.
May it please this unknown court to close this matter once and for all. Based on actual law jurisdiction and no victim claiming to be hurt no affidavit.
To never take one’s rights and to defend the home and family and the states of the Union administration and its Constitutional iron clad contract for we the people one of the people the claimed designated beneficiary the plaintiff.
Mr. Kirkland HQ 14798803369
Notes
Argument and lawsuit cases: If plaintiff is deprived of their rights in some capacity to which they are entitled:
{Owen V Independence 100 vol. Supreme court reports. 1398 (1982)- Main V Thiboutot 100 vol. supreme court reports. 2502(1982)-officers have no immunity when violating Constitutional rights, from liability. Title 42 US Code Sec. 1983, Sec.
1985, and Sec. 1986 say the plaintiff can sue anyone who violates the Constitutional provisions. Case Byars V United States
273 US Supreme Court rulings 28- Encroachment. Miranda V Arizona 384 US 436-says no rule or law by legislation which would abrogate or abolish any Constitutional right provisions-
{All delegated power’s} {Under the 10th Amendment of the United States Of America} all violations {Attach all writ of assist- coupon- bill of attainder-direct Tax} all pertaining to {violating Article 1 Sections 9, and 10 US Constitution} {Title 18 , U.S. Code Sec. 2381- if they fail to protect Constitution they are subject to the charge count 1- felony treason}
Case law Murdock V. Penn. 319 U.S. 105: (1943)-state may not impose a charge for enjoyment of a right by the beneficiary of contract. {Count 2 title 18 US code sect 241,242: if upon conviction the violator is subject to a $10,000 fine, ten years in jail, or both and if theft result, life in prison}
Grounds for Dismissal
#1 No jurisdiction, I request that ____________________________________, Deputy Attorney and Head Attorney for the County of ________________________________________________ to actually prove jurisdiction. I ask this in question by writ and verbally if detained and held against my will before any litigation or mitigation.
The state and the attorneys cannot just assume jurisdiction. The state has the burden of proof in question for the record of jurisdiction, especially when there is no victim with an Affidavit, no property damage, nor any witnesses to the alleged so-called fictional crimes. It’s not against the law to protect yourself from any attackers, one has right to stand their ground and home.
#2 Plaintiff Signature, _____________________________- Requests to the State to claim lawful damages under the Constitution at all levels - Furthermore the Plaintiff is a claimed beneficiary of the Constitution at the state level and at the federal level. American citizen not a so-called sovereign citizen or national citizens, only an American citizens Guaranteed protections. The institutions operating under the color of law teaches their administration and the cops and the lawyers and judges that a sovereign citizen is a enemy of the states, even though that not true.
#3 The Plaintiff wishes to inform the prosecuting attorney, and the court, and here now states for the record that the Plaintiff does not consent to any unconstitutional acts and further does not consent to having my exhibits and my testimony ignored and diminished by the court.
#4 The Plaintiff requests to the state, the clerk recorder, for this record, and for all other claims that may be placed against him, that he does not consent to any unknown contract, except the Constitution in harmony. Let all claims be submitted to a candid administration and to the common court that he claims.
Your honor may it please the court.
#5 I, ______________________________ requests now for a motion for dismissal for failure to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted, the claim and exercise of a Constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime, nor a conflict of statues and codes.
With respect - who says so?
These Supreme case laws say so. Miller v U.S., 230 F 2d 486 ,489. with no injured party, a complaint is invalid on its face, Gibson v. Boyle, 139 Ariz. 512.
#6 Article 6 paragraph 2. Supremacy Clause- Also all judges and lawyers and officers are bound to protect the oath of the Constitutions. And if failed to protect, then it is a crime itself.
Title 18, US Code Sec. 2381:
Failure to protect rights would cause all orders and affect null and void.
#7 _____________________________ has made a sufficient, timely, and explicit reservation of his rights at 1-207, 1-308 w/o prejudice, he then insists that the statutes be construed in harmony with the Common Law and the 7th Amendment of the Bill of Rights. At all levels state and federal.
#8 I, ___________________________ further request that the court produce the injured person who has filed a verified complaint and has done so by a true and honorable affidavit.
Privacy is essential to a strong state of the union and clearly many officers and agents have violated my rights, to fish for a victimless crime for equity. Privacy, according to all states of the union compact agreement contract, and sister states, the bill of rights, is essential.
#9 ____________________________- asks for whoever was injured to be identified because of failure to - Allegations of complaint - Bill of Pain - Bill of attainder - codes, statues listed.
(Alleged Codes and Statutes) declared unconstitutional codes statutes and regulations, police power and proclamations from foreign institutions operating under the color of law, tricking the American people out of their rights by government schemes of admiralty, merchant, commerce, and any pirates of sea. Clearly all violating {Article 1 section 9, and 10) illegal bill of attainder.
COLLECTED FACTS DISCOVERY PUBLIC DOMAIN
Norton V. Shelby County 118 U.S. 425 an unconstitutional act is not law. It confers no rights and poses no duties, affords no protections, and creates no office. It is in legal contemplation inoperative as though it had never been passed. Conflict with the Constitution, no victim, and no property damage,
A state shall not create a crime for equity, nor without a victim or property damage. And the jurisdiction has not been answered in a timely manner and provisions and amendments and articles and declaration of rights have been diminished and ignored.
{Full report if asked in a timely manner of the merit and to reflect the mirror and latter}
{Advocate witness findings of real law}
U.S. V. Bishop 412 U.S. 346 Defines willfulness as an evil motive or intent to avoid a known duty or task under law with immoral certainty -plaintiff, ____________________________ UCC 1-207, 1-308 w/o prejudice is using the constitution and supreme court cases.
The plaintiff is not using evil motives or intents.
16th Andrews Prudent -Second section 97, says that it shall be interpreted in my favor because the plaintiff _________________________UCC 1-207, 1-308 w/o prejudice is claimed and clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary for the protection of his rights and property. And personal safety,
Signature claimed designated beneficiary,
____________________________________________ *****
{See attachment of pain and suffering}
{SEAL}
{INGODWETRUST AND BY THE OATH OF ALL TRUE AMERICAN CITZENS}
2
