Constitution Club

For the past five years I have been a strong supporter of former Sheriff Richard Mack. I have long considered him to be a man of integrity and one of the most articulate spokesmen in the patriot community.  I believe that he is a good man, but has recently exercised what I would consider to be very poor judgment. As his friend, I believe that it is important to support him when he is right and to question him when I think he is not. The purpose of this post is not to discredit Sheriff Mack, it is to question the wisdom of his suggestions. I don't think that opinions he promoted are shared with the vast majority of those in the patriot community.

When he suggested that putting women in the front of the line so that they could be sacrificed in order to make the government look bad, I shuttered at what he had said. The strategy he endorsed made all his supporters look like dangerous radicals. I am sure that there were numerous women at the Bundy Ranch who would have suggested that sacrificing Sheriff Mack would have been a better alternative.

When Sheriff Mack made his appeal to the American people to donate money to CSPOA so that he could pay elected officials to come to the Bundy Ranch, I shook my head in disbelief. I met several people at the ranch who came there with virtually no money in their pockets. Unlike some of the politicians who came for photo opportunities, they came at their own expense to support the principles they believed in.

It is my understanding that the Constitutional Sheriff's and Peace Office's Association is a sole proprietorship. All of the funds generated flow into Sheriff Mack's personal checking account. As a sole proprietor he is not required to reveal how much money is being raised or how it is being spent.

I think that Sheriff Mack has done irreparable damage to his image and to his credibility. I can't imagine how any reasonable County Sheriff would want to be associated with the "loose cannon" of the Bundy Ranch.

Views: 2131

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

"I think that his suggestion of putting women on the front of the line in case the BLM were to fire on the crowds is one that needs to be looked at more closely."

That's a tactic used by islime every day, and justified by al jazeera hundreds of times a day.

Oleg people are getting tired of being pushed around. Women compared to men have the ability to protect their territory more fervently than many men.

Maybe you should learn what the basic make up of women is opposed to men Oleg for Women have to protect their children and females in the animal kingdom  are usually the most vigorous of fighters to protect heir own.

back to you.

Quisno, in case you haven't noticed, this topic is about Sheriff Mack... Laurie is referring to the sheriff's suggestion of placing women and children (sheriff's words) as sacrifices, in other words unarmed... and she goes on to include this tactic for display purposes by MSM.

So I am not sure where you're trying to take this dialogue, perhaps to tell me Laura is trying to make an all woman army ...hey, no doubt better than hussein's army.

i just felt protective at the moment toward laurie, Sheriff mack can go hang.

( In fact the last time i saw him i said just that.) Im tired of show im tired of words they just seem to muddy the clear water in this case.

My daughter who is an Amazon  has affected my judgement of women. for shes one lady that would find a way to gut any opponent  who gets in her way.And shes a real Bear in defense of her Cubs and she has to work with people who could care less about this  nation or its people..

Anyway duly noted ok?

Then we will all hang together!

No Ed if and when we get together as a people this despotism in power will end.

Absolutely Quisno, like you I love mama bears and I am not a papa bear.

Nancy, give it a rest.


© 2019   Created by Keith Broaders.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service