Click on the following link to access Dr. Dan's Freedom ForumClick Here to access Dr. Dan's Video Presentations
Right to Travel
This is being presented as an example of what one CAN do if one feels there is not a way to be free from the misuse of power by City, County or State government. This was developed as a response to the false jurisdiction assumed by our government at all levels. It is effective only when used as part of a complete package of affidavits and a comprehensive removal of the Strawman name jurisdiction which needs to be challenged in writing as well as other forms designed to completely remove ANY assumption of an adherence to any adhesion contracts or assumptions of jurisdiction based on your signature on the same.
This cover letter must be included as part of all other documents in this mailing. I am responding to your mailings dated (dates here). Your mailings are improperly addressed and the actions described therein are unlawful and fall outside of any direct or tangential “jurisdiction” implied or otherwise. Your actions are unconstitutional and as such are unlawful under Natural & International Law, the Laws of Nations and the Constitution of the united states of America. To disallow the right to travel by automobile is a violation of the Constitution and falls outside of any assumed “jurisdiction”. There is no authority for the unlawful suspension of constitutional rights. Further, you have no authority to make any such determination. Your actions CANNOT be ignored. As such herein is my response.
There is no authority in law for any State Department of Transportation to create, set, enforce, or prosecute law, or deliver ultimatums to individual American citizens. Pennsylvania Vehicle code Section 1786(d) is being misapplied to unlawfully include American citizens. These codes are unclearly written and are for COMMERCIAL USE OF THE ROADS ONLY. The mandate in Art. I, Section 8, Part 3, of the Constitution, “to regulate commerce… among the several States” was included so one state could not burden another with levies or taxes, etc, not as a blank slate for manipulation of federal power. Opinion can be manipulated to express everything we do as having an effect on interstate commerce. To allow this to become law is preposterous. The right to travel clearly falls outside this area or “jurisdiction”. This lawful right to travel is reinforced in Thompson V. Smith 154 SE 579
“The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his/her property thereon, either by carriage or automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city [or State] may prohibit or permit at will, but a common right which he/she has [inherently] under the right to ‘Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness’.”
This right is further supported in Chicago Motor Coach V. Chicago, 169 NE 22
“Even the legislature has no power to deny to a Citizen the right to travel upon the highway and transport his/her property in the ordinary course of his/her business or pleasure,…”
American citizens, simply seeking “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness” through travel must not have that right removed BY ANYONE, without “due process” of law.
As stated by Mr. Justice Sutherland in 1926:
“It would be a palpable incongruity to strike down an act of state legislation which, … seeks to strip the citizens of rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution, but to uphold an act by which the same result is accomplished under the guise of a surrender of a right in exchange for a valuable privilege which the state threatens otherwise to withhold. . . . If the state may compel the surrender of one constitutional right as a condition of its favor, it may, in like manner; compel a surrender of all. It is inconceivable that guarantees embedded in the Constitution of the United States may thus be manipulated out of existence.”
Further it is stated that;
“Private interests are to be evaluated under the due process clause of the fourteenth Amendment, not in terms of labels or fictions, but in terms of their true significance and worth.”
William W. Van Alstyne - Harvard Law Review, Vol. 81:1439
What’s clear is that American citizens have a right to travel by the standard conveyance of the times.
–“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among (not over) Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” -- Declaration of Independence.
This power does not descend from government, it descends:
This idea of rights occurring in this order is supported by our founding documents, wherein:
“We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
“The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” – 9th Amendment
“The powers not delegated to the United States (federal government) by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it (the Constitution) to the States, are reserved to the States (discretion) respectively, or to the people (at their discretion).” – 10th Amendment
The right to travel has also been reinforced in briefs, affidavits and notices included as part of this mailing. You must adhere to this LAWFUL request. You must lawfully respond or face default. If you should default and not LAWFULLY respond, your non-response or inaction will be considered acquiescence. I am under NO legal obligation to notice you further.
This information is being presented to you without prejudice or malicious intent. It is given as a courtesy and done so lawfully. If you refuse to respond properly within ten working days from the time of receipt of this correspondence you will be in default and no further legal notice will be given. You will forfeit all right to defense of any kind and any violation may be prosecuted under federal law for crimes, including but not limited to, Title 18, §241, 242. You MUST respond properly to this request. The request is lawful and MUST NOT be ignored. You have TEN DAYS to respond.
Your Name Here
c/o Your Street Address
Your Town, Your State Republic (No Abbreviations)
P.S. – Return address must be copied EXACTLY as written. If there is ANY error in your response, it will be considered willful and UNLAWFUL and will be refused for cause and returned to you unopened. This requirement must not be ignored.
Your Name Here
As you know I am working on that too. Today I just got confirmation that ONLY probate judges have bonds in Ohio.... Contrary to what everybody thinks, whether they should or shouldn't have isn't the question......
ONLY the probate judge have bonds.... So I guess all others fall into the blanket city or county insurance company's coverage. Course it could be in all those BONDS they open and issue on us that creates those CUSIP #'s.
I have never walked thru the door pass the gate... I told her I wouldn't come on her boat. I ask to parlay with the judge only. She told me I couldn't parlay with her but she did let me stay off her boat...I'm SERIOUS here. This is really what happened. I have been there a number of times and never go in. She doesn't even ask anymore nor do I have to say anything. That is why she takes me last she doesn't want anybody to watch.......
HA HA HA!!!. My head was spinning as I read your post. So you might try this.
Repeat to the judge just what you wrote in your post and ask him to clarify all that and what is fake and what is real giving you statutes, constitution and common law maxims as supporting law.
But before he does ask him to PRODUCE the VICTIM to CHARGE you with a TRAFFIC violation...
I have a funny feeling he might just dismiss the case before he gets started. I know I would.
You might be right. He might also think it to be funny. Try this one though. I think you will find this interesting at the very least.
A while back someone told me to circle non-citizen national on a passport application. I keep going back to that and recently stumbled over this.
http://famguardian.org/Publications/WhyANational/WhyANational.pdf National, state national, constitutional but NOT statutory citizen...
I realize WHY the AGENTS of the corporation made it so COMPLICATED but can't someone reduce this down to simple?
Thomas Paine said "keep it simple, simple is easy to fix".. maybe that is where the acronym KISS came from.
PS the link for legal notice and demand looked interesting. I have to find time to read it. THKS
How about using those CAFR accounts that should be able to pay for everything , even baby's new shoes !
CAFR has been coming up a lot in my conversations. In conjunction with the "bonds", performance that is. 11 of the 15 counties here in AZ do not have "bonds". It is "self-insured". Very interesting rabbit holes! Sorry, way off topic.
Maybe we're on different pages ; please go to cafr1.com and see what Walter has to say about the money in those accounts .
Yes, I am aware of what CAFR is. My point is/was, follow the money. Much like CAFR, self insurance pools, have investments funds, property owned, market securities..etc. Either through CAFR of self insurance pools, there would appear to be a conflict of interest. A fudiciary to the Public Trust v. Private, for profit enterprise?
Where do I find the rest of the documents mentioned here?
It depends on which documents you wish to rely upon for accurate filings. I you believe in Bill Thornton's ideas, you need a Legal Notice and Demand, a Notice of Lien, and you need to challenge the "jurisdiction" of the court, ask for a Court of Record every time you go to the room where they hold their meeting with you, and always refuse to "appear", enter a "plea" or go beyond the "bar" or that little short wall that separates the judge and attorneys from the rest of the room.
I am going to put together a comprehensive actionable plan, step by step to follow for all situations, including those in which the judge acts outside of his/her authority and refuses to recognize your demands. It is always helpful to ask if there is a victim and you must always demand that the victim be present in the courtroom that day.
Always ask if that victim will be testifying today on the injury you have allegedly caused and the exact nature of that injury. Usually they cannot produce this. If there is no victim and no injury, (by their own admission, this is usually the case in an "equity" or "Admiralty/Maritime" court proceeding), then you immediately demand that the case be discharged, (not dismissed), for lack of Corpus Delecti, (no dead body).
The judge might say "Case dismissed". You say "I object" and repeat this case must be discharged, not dismissed, (because guilty but we will let you go anyway is what that means). You want to get them to admit that they have thrown these charges at you frivolously and you can then have Prime Facie evidence to go after their money in a claim of your own, or if you listen to Wayne Bachman, go after their insurance bonds with the Uniform Bonding Code. Either way you must get them to admit that they are operating completely outside the "LAW" and have made YOU the victim and you can prove this. You then make a claim, charge them large money and ruin their lives. After all, that's what they are trying to do to you.
I can tell you this without reservation; you must have all paperwork complete and accurate and filed ahead of time before you attempt to challenge their assumptions and fake authority. Timing is usually everything with these people and you must follow the rules in reference to limits.
Three days to return illegal, (unlawful) correspondence from them. No more than ten days for them to respond to you, (always send registered mail for proof of receipt). All other general response times for settling an issue out of court are 21 days, beyond which you may proceed to the next level. Usually this means going to court because you could not come to a private agreement.
As far as specific forms or format, the exact content within these forms varies according to what you believe to be truth. An "Affidavit of Truth" is usually best to start with and I can show you mine if you wish. Msg, me and request and I will email it to you. Don't worry about giving me your email in the reply. I already have access to that.
All other forms vary, but will usually follow a pattern of denying their assumptions of "Strawman, Debtor" status "In the Territory" and assert your "Sovereignty with claims of "Freeman, Secured Party" status instead, to remove any assumptions of authority over your "Non-Corporate" existence, "Upon the Land".
It is usually helpful to assert Stare Decisis or Case Law which supports your ideas or claims as I have in the above article. Uniform Codes can be sited if you wish, but I find they are usually used against you because if you claim to operate under or rely upon them, they can make the accusation that you are thereby "subject to the jurisdiction" of them.
Yes , please send me a copy of your affidavit .