Giving My Two Cents Worth

Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence asserted the following:

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."

You can see here that governments derive their "just powers" from "the consent of the governed." If you'll notice, he also stated that we have a right and a duty to withdraw our consent and alter or abolish it, to whit;

"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.-

When we participate in these mock elections every two years, we are giving our consent to the corrupt governmental establishment.

The studies show that only 40% of eligible voters are actually registered to vote. That means that Republicans and Democrats combined DO NOT REPRESENT A MAJORITY OPINION and yet only these candidates have a chance to be elected. Tell me how THAT happens.

To restore our liberty we need to stop voting for any candidate who belongs to a political party. I do not wish to give the government my consent, therefore I have withdrawn my name from the voter registration rolls as they are today.

The government is powerless if we refuse to participate in their criminal activities. For more;

Watch The Video

Constitution Lectures 1: The Non-Consent of the... by TonaPolk

Views: 509

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Consent attained at the angry end of a billy club or the open end of a loaded gun is not consent. It is coercion and forced compliance.

Right on Bill! 

I'm not registered to vote at this point in time, too many lies told too many times to bother with either party, if I register to vote it will be as an independent. I'm done with the two party system of liars.

I've always been an independent. It is so bad that generally I only vote when I want to give my 'no' to someone that is really bad - like I did with obozo.

Great article, pretty much what I have been telling my friends for years. The answer I get most frequently is that I do not want to waste my vote. My reply is "you will never see any change to more government change until we all become total slaves"

   Get rid of dual isreali, PNAC, AIPAC & clean out the pentagon-then crack down on jewish sayanim sleeper cells. See DHS is near all Zionists;

On March 27, under the auspices of DHS, Special Operations forces  practiced political dissident extraction drills in Ft. Lauderdale, FL.  Many people took this as a personal declaration of war against the  American people.

See coming civil war;

I sent out 1 of the pages in my mass blasts to get more Ppl here,

read n ask why so many billions are sent to the worlds greatest threat, see isreali & or mossad false flag ops-Sandy Hook, Boston, OK City, 911 to the never ending wars in the ME-who gains, zionisreal & the MIC, FTG

   At least vote OUT the incumbents as THEY have BEcome The problem by refusing a solution-same as the corrupt judiciary, tis these Black Robed terrorists that created immunity for all gov't ACTORS. But see Your State Constn, ND Art 1 Sec 21 there is no immunity nor special privileges or by US vs Lee, Truax vs Corrigan; No man tis above the Rule of Law or US vs Olmstead where the gov't has become the lawbreaker; Descency, Security & Liberty alike ensures the gov obey the law-THEY donut even obey their Oath of Office, see 28 USC 453 WHICH HAS CREATED IMMUNITY FOR THE POLICE STATE & KILLER COPS

The judiciary [ judges in constitutional courts ] was eliminated as of 1953 in Oregon. The current courts are part of the legislative branch, thus by law the judges are bound by the intent of the legislature when it comes to applying the law.

Unfortunately the judges now control the legislature and openly ignore the rules of civil procedure and criminal procedure and simply do as they want.

Judges for sale: If you have enough money, you can buy just about any judge you want. 

In 1953 we changed over to the ORS, before that is was called the OLR. Oregon Law Review, in '53 it was changed into the Oregon Revised Statutes, and this was done to allow the OLR to be converted over to the ORS, that transfer was a manipulation by the BAR to rewrite the laws the legislature passed by way of the votes they cast, but the BAR felt that the average legislative "citizen" couldn't pass a law without having their hands held, so through the "legislative council's office" the BAR rewrote all the laws the legislators voted on and renamed them the Oregon Revised Statutes, meaning they were re-written by the office of the legislative councils office which is run by BAR lawyers. 

So we haven't had a citizens legislative body ever since 1953. And this is one of the better kept secrets in Salem ever since. 

Re; Eric Rhodes - Beginning of the ORS. This was not all that happened. 1953 was the first year that the state closed the Judicial Branch and replaced those courts with legislative branch courts.  After that Oregon was known as an 'admin law state'.

This is important because if people understood this, they would understand that these courts have no power to even hear a case concerning state-only citizens.

"Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state."  Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966)

Well that is interesting because I got my info from the State Archive, and I would think the State Archive researcher would have the correct information, and if I am wrong then the State Archive researcher should have been straight up about the information was correct, and I see no particular reason to think he was lying to me about my inquiry. 

My question was, There is a law requireing that every student from 8th grade through high school would have been required to have been instructed though the course curriculum established by the State in the study of the Constitution's of Oregon, and the U.S Constitution, a required number of hours each year to graduate from High School, this particular law was passed by the legislature in 1923 back when the laws were published under the OLR, rather then the ORS which replaced the OLR in 1953. Is this a coincidence, or was it a lie? Just curious, but keep in mind the State Archive is maintained by the Secretary of State, and in this particular matter that person was Kate Brown. Are you beginning to see what I am getting at?

Your almost there, we have to get rid of the BAR first before we can retake our Government. the British Accredited Registry is a left over from when the British ruled the colonies and even well before that. Today the BAR, a non Government Association of lawyers, most of whom are private practice attorney's, has taken over control of our Courts all the way up to each State Supreme Court, and every State Bar Association, none of which are a part our Government in a real Constitutional way. I see nothing that remotely mentions or allows for such a non Governmental association to be allowed to even access or regulate the practice of law any where in the United States of America today, or in every State Constitution. If any one knows where such a NON Governmental association is even allowed to exert even a shred of influence as the BAR is most assuredly foreign to our Countries governmental authority. The British never really left back after the revolutionary war, they are still in effect to this day. And we will have one heck of a fight to throw out the State BAR Associations once and for all. Everyone here should vet this for them selves, call your State BAR up and ask this simple question: Is the (fill in your State's name) is the BAR an agency of our State's Government? And I already know the answer, no it is not.

And yet every Judge is a member of their State BAR, your attorney is one, so is the Judge, and so is the D.A. all the way upto your County DA and his Deputies, the Judges are all in on this one, so how are you supposed to get a fair and impartial hearing/trial when the Courts have you at every step of the way dealing with on all sides members of the State BAR a NON Governmental association stacked up against you? This one that is gaining momentum, the people in every state are finally waking up to the real History of the BAR in the United States, and there is no such allowence for the BAR's presence in our Government today. But many here already know this, and for those who didn't, start calling your State BAR and ask it they are in any way a branch of our Government today...the answer is no, they are not a branch of our Countries Government, yet they have infiltrated our legislative branches in each of the 50 States including each territory of our Country. The BAR doesn't belong here in our Country, and has no place in it today, let's send them packing as soon as possible.

About getting rid of the Bar...  The state constitution does not give the state the power to tell a state-only citizen he has to be a member to work at law in or out of a court. All the legislature can do is publicly track their performance.

Legislative courts are different. The legislature creates them and can therefore set any rules it want in regard to who works in them.  Further, I have not seen that a court has said that a US / 14th subject has the right to work at any profession they want.  In fact, the states have set up all sorts of rules regarding the privilege of US subjects to work.

Since the judges [ Bar ASSoc ] controls the legislature, it is unlikely we will see a departure from the corrupt system now in place.


© 2020   Created by Online Professor.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service