Colonel Edward Mandel House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson (President 1913 - 1921),
Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call "Social Insurance."
Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation ( USA ) to foment this plot against America .
-Colonel Edward Mandell House
Replies
I'm submitting to local papers. Thanks.
I do not believe this to be true.
Based on....?
I. Cole
You asked "Based on?" First off it started off with, “he stated in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson” which would lead a thinking person to believe it was verbal rather the written. I am sure it was not recorded back then. Next it was too well written to have been spoken; people don’t speak the way they write. So if it was true it would had too have been some time later by one of the two people in the private meeting. Nowhere did it imply that was the case.
Then it states “that will operate under the ancient system of pledging.” Birth Certificates only certify and confirm that a child was born it has nothing to do with pledging.
Then it states “will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency.” Whatever that was supposed to mean in this writing? Charge back means (reversal of charges), that is the last thing bankers would want to affect the security of their so called “fiat paper currency” which is just IOU’s of the banks that is loaned, at interest, into circulation to the people. The security for those loans are the promises to pay and the mortgages the borrowers sign, that gives the bankers ownership of all the borrowers property if the loan plus the interest can’t be paid.
Next comes the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) nonsense. Bills of lading are documents evidencing receipt of goods for shipment issued by persons engaged in the business of transporting good. Birth Certificates only certify and confirm that a child was born and have no value for anything except when one might have to prove how old they are.
I. Cole
On Jan. 3 2014 I sent the Minnesota Department of Health this e-mail
Birth Certificates
Dears Sirs:
It has come to my attention that the Minnesota Birth Certificates now have the words America Bank Company printed on the outside border. I would like to know why it is there and if it has any meaning?
Thanking you in advance for your reply,
They replied, Hi Byron, This is not correct. The birth certificates do not contain these words around the outside edge. Thank you.
Then I sent this e-mail, Thanks for your prompt reply. I believe that I made a mistake the words are Midwest Bank note Company. I would like to know why it is there and if it has any meaning? Don’t tell me is not there I know it is on my grandchild’s birth Certificate.
They replied Byron – This wording no longer appears on current birth certificates. If you see if on your grandchild’s birth certificate it must be from a few years ago. In talking to a coworker that has been with the department for 9 years, she said it is the name of the company that produces the security paper that we used to use. That is the only meaning behind it. People misinterpret that to mean it is a bank note, and wanted to “cash it in” at a bank. From: Health.Issuance@state.mn.us
I. Cole
Then I was given this.
Founded in 1956, Midwest Bank Note Company has dedicated over 50 years of printing expertise to the production of security documents designed to protect against counterfeit and fraudulent alteration.
We specialize in the use of sophisticated paper and ink security technologies as well as the use of security printing and design equipment. Midwest Bank Note Company is a corporate member of NAPHSIS (National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems) NASPO (North American Security Products Organization)
Our expertise has contributed to the evolution of a standard vital record paper specification that has been adopted by Health Agencies in 26 states and territories, recognizing Midwest Bank Note Company as a leader in document security solutions and document protection.
Midwest Bank Note Company promotes the use of engraved Intaglio Printing as a pre-requisite for face value documents as well as documents of intrinsic value. Midwest's sales offices serve all 50 states as well as international customers.
I. Cole
And this,
Is my birth certificate a bank note? if so is it worth money?
F. Frederick Skitty answered 8 months ago
No. This is an utterly ridiculous conspiracy theory put forth by some really ignorant people.
In some states, New York, Louisiana, and Texas, among them, the blank forms that birth certificates are printed on are produced by the Midwest Banknote Company of Buffalo, New York. Here is a link to their web site:
http://www.midwestbanknote.com/vital-rec...
The company logo appears in the lower right hand corner of the document. Apparently, some idiot decided that if the blank forms for birth certificates are printed by a banknote company, then they must be banknotes. It never occurs to these morons that birth and death certificates should have security features like banknotes do, so a banknote company is a logical choice to produce blank forms.
I. Cole
Just because I know the writing we are talking about is a fraud. That doesn't mean that I don't understand that the top men in banking and their cohorts have plans to rule the world as that is a proven fact.
However they get all their power through the ownership and control of all the monies of the world. Stop and think about it, if you can create all the money the world uses as a personal profit to your self and also as interest bearing loans to everyone else, it would almost be impossible not to rule the world in time. That is why the first thing we need to do is take that power from them.
It will not be easy but it can be done if we all band together.
"Birth Certificates only certify and confirm that a child was born and have no value for anything except when one might have to prove how old they are."
This statement is untrue. In fact, the states are allotted a certain amount of money from the Federal government for each birth certificate that is registered. This can be found in the Social Security Act, although I am at a loss to find the specific section. I read it a one time, from an official source but have not had a chance to go back to find it. Clearly the BC does have value.
The Federal reserve publications explain how money is created. When an individual signs a loan agreement/promissory note the bank enters the amount as a liability and an asset then credits the "borrower's" account with that amount of money. The bank does not give the "borrower" anything that ever belonged to it and therefore what the "borrower" pays back is free "money." In fact, only a small fraction of currency is created through printing. How else could banks have so much wealth? Do you honestly think the banks and top executives that make millions of dollars acquired that wealth by "creating" anything but currency?
Two things are required for a "loan" - a name (i.e. BC) and a social security number. Without these two things one would not be able to access credit. Our currency is nothing more than digits, which can be created or expunged with the stroke of a key on a computer. The wealth in this country lies with the people because we have the energy to labor and create things. Banks have no such value. The US Code prohibits banks from lending on their own credit or other depositors' money. When one goes to a bank for a "loan," the bank enters the note as an asset (money of account) and attaches a liability (debt in the form of FRNs - money of exchange). All the bank does is exchange one form of currency for another and then charges the "borrower" the same amount plus interest. Talk about a good game for the bankers!
Sure, the "credit" is in the form of future labor but without evidence of a living, breathing, human being (i.e. the BC) then how could the "bank" front that individual his "credit"? We live in a world of "pay it forward," which (I believe) is why our debt only increases and never decreases. The real question is, who actually deserves the repayment if the bank is doing nothing more than exchanging future labor for currency?
With all due respect, Mr. Dale, do you honestly think that your government is telling you the truth when they respond to your questions? Or, do you believe that whoever they have responding to your questions actually understands what's really going on?
The BC is insurance, i.e. a bond, and evidence of the only thing that has intrinsic value today - human energy, for everything we have that is useful comes directly from this value.
What else would you suggest supports this country? Banks? Haha. Now THAT would be a funny story.
Regardless of where this "quote" came from, common sense tells you that there is truth to the statement, whether or not you want to believe the BC is a "bill of lading." I think that was Tom's point. Just because a quote like this cannot be corroborated it does not mean the statement itself is untrue.
M Martinez
You seem to be a little confused or you did not type what you meant to say. This is how it works
When an individual signs a loan agreement/promissory note the bank enters the amount of the borrower promissory note on the books of the bank as an asset to the bank and a liability to borrower. Then the bank monetizes the borrowers debt the puts those numbers into the borrowers checking account as a liability to the bank and as asset to the borrower. You are right, the newly created money (the money the banker create when he monetized the borrower debt) enterers into the "borrower's" account as a credit.
You are right, the bank does not give the "borrower" anything he loans the borrowers number in an account that never existed before the loan was made. Those numbers are what we use for money. The borrowers can then go out and write checks that will be honored by the bank and buy anything the borrower wants. When the money is repaid the money is extinguished disappears from the books of the bank. “Money is created when loans are issued and debts incurred, money is extinguished when loans repaid”. John B Hendrickson, senior specialist price and economics, congressional research service, Library of Congress.
You are correct that only a small fraction of what we for money is created by the use of a Printing Press. Then you asked, “How else could banks have so much wealth?” They get that wealth through compound interest and by creating money that is used for investments. Do you honestly think the banks and top executives that make millions of dollars acquired that wealth by "creating" anything but currency? I need said anything to the contrary.
The rest of what you wrote is not worth dealing with, with the exception of your last statement.
“Just because a quote like this cannot be corroborated it does not mean the statement itself is untrue.” It clearly does not mean that the statement itself is true either.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 5 Next