Dred Scott Decison

Dred Scott v. Sandford

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scott v. Sandford
Argued February 11–14, 1856
Reargued December 15–18, 1856
Decided March 6, 1857
Full case name Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford
   
Holding

Judgment reversed and suit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
1. Persons of African descent cannot be, nor were ever intended to be, citizens under the U.S. Const. Plaintiff is without standing to file a suit.
2. The Property Clause is only applicable to lands possessed at the time of ratification (1787). As such, Congress cannot ban slavery in the territories. Missouri Compromise is unconstitutional.
3. Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits the federal government from freeing slaves brought into federal territories.

 

Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Taney, joined by Wayne, Catron, Daniel, Nelson, Grier, Campbell
Concurrence Wayne
Concurrence Catron
Concurrence Daniel
Concurrence Nelson, joined by Grier
Concurrence Grier
Concurrence Campbell
Dissent McLean
Dissent Curtis
Laws applied
 post-war Reconstruction Amendments. It is now widely regarded as the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court.[3][6][7]

You need to be a member of Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America to add comments!

Join Constitution Club - 2020 Vision 4 America

Email me when people reply –