I just got sent this one. It is excerpts from conversations with a man who seems to have the right idea about how to keep it simple and avoid the "code" language being used to "trap" us in an alternate "jurisdiction" and I just didn't have time to go thru the entire 190 pages of rhetoric and decipher out an exact science from it. It should have started with a note from me explaining this, but again I didn't have time. Take it for what it's worth at this time. I will follow it later with a better rendition of the exact source info. Sorry for the incomplete nature of this discussion topic.
Anytime the state moves the court and creates an order and tells you it has a judgment passed against you; they are all null and void because they cannot produce a victim. Nobody will show up in court and swear under oath or affirmation that you did something wrong. So you make them prove it. You ask them; can you prove it: is there a verified, (not certified), criminal complaint before this court? Who is the injured party?
So you just say to the judge; “do you not have what i wrote in front of you?” If the judge says: “Yes i do.” You respond, “Well that’s all i have to say to the court at this time. If you want to hold me or enter a plea for me i am going to charge you ten thousand dollars a day, (or whatever amount), for every day you hold me in here until the injured party appears and if he doesn't appear the clock is ticking. One dollar for every second you interfere with my rights. What is your wish?”
The fact that a plaintiff must be present and “appear” and prove injury by you is an ancient common law that has been around for thousands of years. This has never changed. This is “Common Law”, common to all men, common to all times. “I just want a common law, court of record, trial.” The common law is the law of this land. There is no higher law. “Can you show me where, a court of record is outlawed?”
So here it is:
Parties, claimant, i, [use of the lower case i, is typically (but not always) used to describe yourself], a man, by my will, move this case through this federal court by way of rights secured and protected to a man by the bill of rights and the united states constitution Articles I, VII, IX and X and under the common law of the land. It’s not plaintiff versus defendant. It’s just prosecutor versus wrongdoer. I am prosecutor; I am the one moving the claim. That’s how i define myself as a claimant. I am just a man. If you try to diminish my standing, i can’t accept that. I am just an aggrieved man and aggrieved just means somebody who has lost his rights and he wants his rights back.
So:
You've got a claim; state your claim.
If you don’t make your claim under oath or affirmation in open court it could be considered a void judgment. So make your claim one or two sentences and never change one single thing, or your claim will be considered null and void. Your word is your bond. Never let them talk you into “being reasonable”; it’s a trick. Don’t fall for it.
Original Editor’s Note: Hold your ground on the claim’s facts and value. The claim is the claim. If you want to accept a lower counter offer than your claim, you may agree to accept the partial payment but you will forgive the balance out of the kindness of your heart.
Before you do a law suit, you have to give fair warning; 6 steps and you’re done.
- I, your name here, give no entity the right to administer my property. You can use it for any charges against you
- I, say that fill in the blank, (baby Johnny, car, time, money, weapon) is my property.
- I say no man or woman can say or make their own claim that my claim is untrue.
- I want my property returned to me.
- Said property is to be totally under my control; postpaid within 3 days or whatever time you are going to give them.
- I will charge wrongful holder of said property X amount of money/time increment that my property is not returned to me, starting on the 22nd day after they have received this summons and this suit. See attached claim.
You have to give fair warning, so you have to give them 21 days to answer the law suit.
So that’s how you beat the GOVERNMENT all the time, because the GOVERNMENT needs to have the plaintiff appear and prove that you injured them.
Replies
Not only that but when you demand a court of record and the judge says no, just inform him that he is wanting to fine you, and any time there is an exchange of money, there has to be a record. You are now in a court of record because you are now in a commercial activity. He won't like it because he won't be bonded for commercial activity. In Commercial Law, you cannot use a courtroom until ALL sources of remedy have been exhausted, and all parties have to accept going to a judge-only court trial, and have to sign an accepting to do so, and you need at least 2 witnesses to witness that due process of law was followed.
This is part of my law suit, as due process was not followed. I gave the judge every warning in the book that it was going to come to this, but he thought I was joking, because I was laughing a good share of the time I was in court. Hartford says not to laugh, don't be angry. Just be ho-hum neutral.
It's a good article. Thank you Morton.
Wayne, thanks. Very helpful.
Bad Bob
Hi Guys. I have much to add to this topic, but time alludes me right now. I think and hope this conversation picks up momentum. I am of the opinion, all of our grievances, and they are many and varied, begin and end with the judicial system. As simple as the process should be, it is a labyrinth of smoke, mirrors, and deception. For now I contribute this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zxaN__ENefs
I hope to add more as time permits.
Hey Christine,
I hope you don't mind but I embedded your video into my article. Thanx for the help.
Not at all Morton, happy to contribute!
Very interesting and informative. Thank you Christine!
Without Prejudice UCC 1-308, We are Constitutional patriots and are volunteer tax payers that certify we fulfill all interpretative requirements Of Title 24, USC.
Never sign a TAX Return with the UNDER PENALTY of PERJURY statement.
"Hinge statement, there are one or two events where the Courts under 24 USC declared that tax payers are volunteer"
All of you, keep this in mind. I used 1-308 when I signed everything, and it is on my drivers license as well, and the judge was served a copy of my license, and I also put Non-Assumpsit on everything, which means No Contract. He declared me guilty anyway, and that is not a bad idea! 2 days later I walked into the court, got copies of the court proceedings/minutes, whatever you want to call them.
I now have the hard evidence that there is a conspiracy to use coercion to extort personal property/money from me, conversion of an infraction into a crime, 90 days (suspended) and $90 fine when no crime was committed (no contract with the corporation-- violation of Commercial Law, which includes contract law), also a violation of 4th, 5th 6th 7th, 8th, and maybe 9th Amendment rights, commercial activity being done in a courthouse that is funded with public funds, and without the judge being properly bonded to conduct such an illegal activity, violation of due process of law, and violation of proper use of my TRADE MARK, "WAYNE BACHMANN". I charge $300 per each use of my TRADE MARK, and it has to be used in a proper manner, and I, only I, determine what is proper and non-proper use of my TRADE MARK.
I now use the Uniform Bonding Code, NOT UCCs, to sue the cop, prosecuting atty. and the judge, and since the prosecuting atty. and the clerk worked together to make sure I have insurance, I now have them tied together with the cop, for insurance racketeering (RICO) since the state is a silent partner working with the insurance companies, to force you to buy a product that the state is involved in the making of, and by forcing you to buy insurance (creating more volume sales) the state gets a cheaper rate on their bonds and insurance. That is why the government forces you to buy insurance, which brings up another charge.
I knew there was more! This is the first ticket I have seen where the ticket indicates that my car is NOT a Commercial Vehicle! That is evidence that the state is involved in a fraud of demanding I register my car to use it on the roads, since all licenses are about commercial activity.
The ticket also states that the car belongs to me. The State holds the true title, the MSO/MCO (Manufacturer's Statement/Certificate of Origin). Now you have an instrument (the ticket) that not only is it unconstitutional because of it being a Bill of Attainder/Writ of Assistance/unlawful taxation, you have an instrument that is eluding to the state being involved in a constructive fraud to steal your car. If the State owns your car (Cert. of Title is not ownership of your car. It is a sweat equity title, so you only own its value), then the State is responsible for all maintenance, tires, repairs, etc..
I am probably forgetting a charge or two, but you get the idea. Oh, I forgot to mention, the Deputy didn't sign the ticket, and the deputy at the Sheriff's Office says he doesn't have to. Guess what? I was fined,etc.....unjustly punished for a document that is not a lawful contract! That also is a violation of Commercial Law!
The deputy wasn't careful about noting that I have a motorcycle endorsement, and listed me as NOT having one. Now I have a document that has false and misleading information on it. It only takes one mistake to make a document invalid. If one part of the ticket is invalid the whole document is invalid. There are LOADS of mistakes being made through the use of this invalid, illegal, unlawful, unconstitutional document.
For those who may not know, legal and lawful are not the same thing. Something can be legal, but not be lawful. Since the "corporation" drafted their own version of the constitution in 1871, you may have differences due to the abandonment of the original 13th Amendment. I am bringing that against them also, all of them who are BAR registrants anyway. BAR stands for BRITISH Accreditation Registry. What is a secret society based in London, (a foreign country) doing in this country in our court systems and politics?
Since one of the Deputies assaulted me before I signed the ticket, which is illegal from a charge of its own, but it is being used by me to show that I was put under duress to sign the ticket, which naturally, is added to the charges against them, in conspiracy, and by doing that, they all have this charge against them as a group. I have a copy of the Dash-Cam, which also reveals more about the conspiracy, and both deputies wanting to pull me out of the car, when I had committed no crime. I committed an infraction, but because I have no contract with the corporation (Non-Assumpsit), there has been a lot of crime done on all of their parts, and they are all Commercial Law violations, and the UBC, along with the Constitution, which, when used with a copy of their Oath of Office, shows the proof of the contract signed.
I highlight where they swore to uphold and defend and OBEY the Constitutions, serve copies on all guilty parties, along with Sec. of State, Atty. Gen. INSURANCE COMMISSIONER, and others. I highlighted insurance commissioners for a reason, just a moment. Then after I have served all parties, I note on a list, EXACTLY what date and time I served them. This is VERY IMPORTANT information that the bonding companies want. All guilty parties have to report to their bonding companies within 30 days of when they are served, and they want to know to the minute, as it can mean the difference of a lot of money. If they do not report to the bonding companies within 30 days, they automatically loose their bonds, and this includes the Insurance Commissioner for the State, and may include bonds for the city, county, state. It can be a major issue involving timing.
If you are interested in more info, feel free to ask. Hartford Van Dyke is the expert on this process, but I am willing to help where I can, so as to release his load. Hartford is still working with Randy Due, also, even though he is locked up, to keep him from helping others.
I failed to mention that after the papers are served on everybody, all three copies to each individual being stamped "received" dated and signed or initialed, let them choose which one of the three copies they want to keep so they can't accuse you of giving an altered document, and you keep 2 copies for yourself. Make sure you enter on the list when and what time they were served to each individual, then go behind their backs and serve copies of everything, including copies of the list, to at least 5 major bonding/insurance companies, like AETNA, HARTFORD, etc. They will make sure the proper bonding company will get the papers.
You should be able to get the proper insurance/bonding info directly from your opponent, but if you can't, no problem. You want to make sure to send to several bonding companies to "publicly" expose the problem with the corrupt individuals, which will help prevent the criminals from getting re-bonded through another company, and it also helps to publicly expose the bonding company involved, so the other companies will know who is not acting in integrity, thus helping to insure integrity.
As a member of a jury I used this as a defense for the defendant whose accuser failed to appear ... the State prosecuted regardless. Of course, the defendant was found not guilty. But it takes someone to stand up and educate a jury.
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
of 6 Next