US courts are debt collectors NOT COURTS for JUSTICE . . .
The work of Dr. Shirley Moore.
Lowering the bar on the BAR! Evict the Crown Agents!
Following provided by Clint Richardson:
http://republicbroadcasting.org/the-corporation-nation-with-clint-richardson/
All these courts are privately owned trading companies. The united States district courts are all owned…those are your article one courts. They’re all owned by the united States attorney’s executive offices out of Washington DC which is a privately owned corporation. They’re article one legislative tribunals. They’re not courts.
They have a DUNS number, they have a pit code, sip code, NAICS number (North America Identification Security Classification). You have to have that number in order to trade internationally. All these courts are registered with the DOD, Department of Defense. They have a DUNS number which is Data Universal Numbering System. That’s a Dun & Bradstreet number.
You have to be registered with CCR, Contractors Central registration under the DOD. They have another department called the DLIS, Defense Logistics Information Service. The DLIS issues a case code that’s spelled CAGE, Commercial And Government Entity which corresponds to the bank account.
They have a bank account. They take everything that you file into the court and they securitize it. These banks are all registered, they have a depository agreement, a security agreement and an escrow agreement. Most of them are registered with the Federal Reserve bank of New York city.
They use what they call…(North Carolina uses) a circular 16, as their depository agreement. They take public funds and they deposit them under a process called a depository resolution agreement. They also have a security agreement which the clerk of the courts signs with the bank.
They have an escrow agent that acts as the go-between the federal reserve bank that they have the account with…so all these courts are taking your money and funneling it into an escrow account. Most of them are in New York. There’s 60 trillion dollars of your money in the federal reserve bank of New York city. They’ve told the courts not to rule against the banks on these foreclosure cases. They’re all in bed together and what these lawyers are doing is acting as private debt collectors under the Debt Collectors Practices Act, its called the FDCPA and its title 15 section 1692.
When you’re a public debt collector you have to be registered with the government, and you have to have a license and a bond in order to collect debt. Well these attorneys are what you call private debt collectors and exempted by the BAR association on that provision, but their firm is not. The firm they work for has to be registered and they have to have a license and a bond and they don’t.
In all these court cases that you’re involved in, these attorneys are acting as private debt collectors. What they’re doing is collecting money from you as private debt collectors with no license or bond; this is unlawful.
They perform these illicit practices through what is called a Warrant of Attorney. Black’s law dictionary of 1856 defines a warrant of an attorney. Its like a writ of execution. Its like a put or a call. When you do a margin call that means they use it to buy equity securities.
This is because they securitize everything that you file into court which means they turn it into a negotiable instrument. Then they sell it as a commercial item.
These commercial liens are classified as distressed debt (Unifund), and some of the same debt collectors, buy up all these court judgments as distressed debt. Then they put them into hedge funds and they sell them to investors globally.
Of course when you get into selling debt instruments you’re creating a security risk. Anytime you get into risk management you have to have re-insurance. That’s where Luer Hermes comes in. They’re an underwriting company. And they’re a sub division of Alliance SE out of Munich Germany. And they’re the US agency that acts as a bond holder for Alliance SE is PIMCO bonds who takes all your securities, pool them. This is the same financial tactics they use on these mortgage loans, all of this is explained on their web site.
All of your mortgage loans are securities. The notes have a maturity of more than 9 months so they’re a security by definition. If you go to title 15 section 77 A b 1 it tells you that any note with a maturity of more than 9 months is a security by legal definition and is considered as an investment contract. So when you sign and endorse these notes as the drawer and the maker you’re in an investment contract. Your signature created a security. They take the security and they securitize it (as soon as they endorse it for payment, they’ve securitized it). The loan is no longer secured. They’ve collapsed the trust and there’s no corpus in the trust under probate law. Now they turn around and sell it as a mortgage backed security (PIMCO takes the mortgage backed security pools over and sells them as bonds). So bonds actually come from pooled securities. These bonds are then sold on the TBA market globally.
And all these courts are involved in that. And the only time you can stop them is when you make them liable and that’s what I’ve been doing. I do a letter Rogatory which is a letter of instruction under the Hague convention. And its under title 18 section 1781 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure I believe its 28 B. And you tell them what you want them to do. You make a contract with them. When you go into these courts you contract with them. And they run out of the court room.
Replies