----Dedicated to Pursing God’s Will for the World----

Replies

  • Help Educate America
    Click on the following link to help educate America.
    Donations are not tax deductible.
    Click Here to use Pay Pal
    Keith Broaders
    1230 N Street #510
    Sacramento, California 95814
    Phone (916) 399-4881
    Donate
  • MUST READ:   Income Tax Shattering the Myth   95% of the people are not required to pay Income Tax PERIOD

  • There are many people with theories on this. IF we were under the protection of the constitutions, a state-born white could simply deny being a citizen of the fed gov / United States and legally claim exemption from 99.9999% or more of fed laws and around 80% of current state laws.  We are not under the protection of the constitutions and have no recognized rights under current communist policy. We only have privileges.

    • Thanks for chiming in Bill,

      But I believe we have transcended the need for the 14th Amendment and the rest of the constitutions currently in use today. It has been pointed out to me that we are basically American civilians with the responsibility to secure our Nation against invasion by enemies both foreign and domestic, hence the need for a militia type body to carry out this protection.

      Secondly we are born with rights, antecedent to the creation of governments and constitutions. To claim that some mysterious piece of paper somewhere that is designed to control these governments can take that away, or that it can be given away by free will is ludicrous. It is also foolish to believe that we must follow the rules and regulations designed for the "subjects/citizens" you speak of. We are not subjects or citizens. We are human, living man/woman, civilian in status, American National by lawful separation and Non-Resident Alien to the tangential corporate "United States" and the IRS.

      • The 14th is moot because we are under communist and organized crime controlled fed military occupation thus placing the constitutions on hold and all rights they secured.  This action was made complete with a change in all trial courts in the states.

        • Made complete with a complete ripoff of our courts, by the very thing we think is there to protect us; The Constitution. Daniel Alan Pendergast is right. Constitutions are for constitutors. We the people are God's people.

          We are not the creation of government. They are our creation and as such, it is high time we took back control of our creation, now out of hand in so many ways, that I'm finding myself a little overwhelmed trying to chronicle them all.

          The point is, that the time to worry about which violation is the one to pick on, or which one is at the root of the problem, is over now. A New Declaration. A Declaration of Intent to Separate should now be completed to inform them in no uncertain terms that we are coming for them and there will be no escape for the guilty.

          • The constitutions were created and adopted to secure and protect a long list of rights for 'we the people' which were free whites. Thus the constitutions were for them. I have no idea of what a 'constitutor' is.

            Under communist and organized crime fed military occupation, the constitutions are silent - and as a result, all rights are suspended.

            • Aside from the protections of the people from Govco's intrusion on the basic rights and freedoms of those people,  enumerated in the instrument, the basic premise of any constitution is to determine who will be liable for the debts of the government.

              "Constitutor: In civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the debt of another". Blacks Law, 6th, page 312.

  • Under the constitutions, the rights listed in any bill of rights were only a listing of the most basic rights. The framers did not try and list all rights. They existed where the states were not granted any power to regulate an action.

    The agreement issue: Neither the states nor the Untied States were granted the power to use deception to gain a harmful agreement with a citizen.

This reply was deleted.