MAJOR UNCONSTITUTIONAL
“FEDERAL ACTIONS”
On 11/22/1994, thirty Republican governors unanimously agreed that “Federal action has exceeded the clear bounds of its jurisdiction under the Constitution and thus violated rights guaranteed to the people” in a document known as the Williamsburg Resolve. (see www.williamsburgresolve.org) Following are a few of the more important “actions” thought to have been alluded to by the governors.
This unlawful “Federal Action” is the result of many Americans being politically apathetic due to a lack of knowledge and integrity. By failing to hold politicians accountable, we have allowed them to break our laws with impunity. Through their criminal acts, they have transformed our Constitutional Republic into a nation-state of global governance, murdered many of our fellow Americans and people of other nations, and led us into undeclared and unwarranted wars. No longer are the principles of life, liberty and the freedom to pursue happiness paramount. Our once great nation is now morally, financially, philosophically, and institutionally broke. Fascism, a political philosophy stressing the primacy and glory of the state, unquestioning obedience to it and harsh suppression of dissent, is now in vogue.
The criminals have supplanted our political institutions and historical legal and social traditions with new ones and are seeking to establish a New World Order defined as “a world that has a supranational authority to regulate world commerce and industry, an international organization that would control the production and consumption of oil; an international currency that would replace the dollar; a world development fund that would make funds available to free and communist nations alike; and an international police force to enforce the edicts of the New World Order.”
A few of the most damaging of their unlawful acts are:
Government attacks on Americans & others - An objective analysis of the evidence surrounding the events at WACO, the Oklahoma City bombing, and the World Trade Center clearly show that the “official” versions of what happened was a pack of innuendos and lies. Government’s refusal to support a thorough and honest examination of the evidence surrounding these incidents shows the extent to which it will go to intimidate the public, provide government excuses to further restrict our liberties, drag us into unwarranted wars, and slaughter thousands of people in other nations based on false claims. Information on these acts is available at www.whatreallyhappened.com , at www.911truth.org, and other web sites. And who can forget Ruby Ridge? A report on that fiasco is available at http://landnetonecom.net/tlp/ref/weaver.shtml
Ignoring of the original 13th Amendment – Though properly ratified as clearly shown in the "LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ARRANGED AND PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF AN ACT OF CONGRESS BY JOHN BIOREN AND W. JOHN DUANE OF PHILADELPHIA AND R. C. WEIGHTMAN, WASHINGTON CITY. 1815"; page 74 and in the MILITARY LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES Compiled and Published Under Authority of the War Department BY TRUEMAN CROSS IN 1825 the original 13th Amendment has been ignored by government. Here is the exact wording of the Amendment.
"If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honor, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatsoever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them."
There is only one class of people in America who have received a title of nobility from a foreign power. BAR affiliated attorneys who, as much as any identifiable group of people, are responsible for the many unconstitutional Acts in place today.
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 - With this act, three members of Congress transferred its power “to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin…” (Art.1, Sec. 8, Clause 5 of the Constitution) to a deceitfully named, privately owned bank called the Federal Reserve System (the FED). The FED chose to monetize debt rather than wealth; thereby placing Americans in perpetual economic bondage. This was made clear by a member of the Dept. of Treasury who wrote: “the actual creation of money always involves the extension of credit by private commercial banks” and that “money to pay the interest on borrowed money comes from the same source as the money comes from.” Our medium of exchange isn’t money which - by definition - must be a storehouse of value; it is instruments of debt; Federal Reserve Notes if you will that must be borrowed into existence. According to the U.S. Supreme Court in Ling See Fan vs. United States of America, the act is unlawful. The court stated: “the power to coin money and regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin is a prerogative of sovereignty and a power exclusively vested in the Congress of the United States.” The Constitution contains no provision allowing Congress to abrogate a responsibility and transfer a delegated power to a third party! This act provides the fuel for the engines powering the subversion of America.
The 14th Amendment - This is often referred to as the “omnibus Amendment” as it is an all encompassing law which created a new class of citizen; one who is “a child of the state” in the words of Senator Charles Summer. This amendment is the harbinger of the welfare state. Its interpretation provides the basis for minimum wage laws, Social Security, welfare, grants, affirmative action, unemployment insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, etc. Our society was originally built on the moral precepts of the Bible. The authority to maintain and enforce such activities rested with state and local governments. The 14th amendment changed that and shifted jurisdiction over such activities to the Federal government. This opened the door for Federal intervention into every facet of our lives.
Noted columnist James J. Kilpatrick wrote: “the people who say the fourteenth amendment was never validly ratified are exactly right.” Research has shown that the joint resolution proposing this amendment was never submitted to, or adopted by, a Congress duly constituted under Art.1, Sec. 3 and Art. 5 of the Constitution. Additionally, it was never submitted to the President for approval per Art. 1, Section 7 of the Constitution nor was it ratified by ¾ of the states in the union.
The Emergency Banking Act of Mar 9th, 1933 is a direct result of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The FED demanded the interest on the “money” (debt) it created from thin air and loaned to government be paid in specie; i.e. gold. In describing its purposes and functions, the FED wrote: “The process of monetizing gold…are essentially the same as they were when gold itself was held by the Federal Reserve Banks. The only difference is that the title to the gold owned by the United States is in the Treasury and that the Reserve Banks hold claims on it in the form of gold certificates or a credit in the gold certificate account… The gold certificate account represents, in effect, warehouse receipts issued to the Reserve Banks by the Treasury against its gold holding. In return the Reserve Banks issue an equal value of credits to the Treasury deposit account…computed at the statutory price of $42.22 per fine troy ounce. Because all gold held by the Treasury as of the date of table 3.A.1 has been monetized in this fashion, the Federal Reserve Bank’s gold certificate account of $11.1 billion represents the nation’s entire official gold stock.” No longer able to pay its interest in specie by 1933, America was officially bankrupt. Hence, the Emergency Banking Act of 1933. In essence, Congress became a trustee in bankruptcy operating on behalf of the central bankers under this act.
Through the Emergency Banking Act of March 9, 1933, the Emergency War Powers of the Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 was applied to citizens of the United States through an amendment to the act. This made Americans the official enemies of, and at war with, the Federal government.
On August 30, 1973, a United Press International (UPI) news release said: “A special Senate subcommittee, after a painstaking computer search of the statue books, concluded the United States since 1933 has been operating under emergency rule, conferring near-authoritarian powers on its presidents.” The “special subcommittee” alluded to was the Senate Special Committee on the termination of the National Emergency. It reportedly “discovered 470 major provisions of Federal law giving presidents ‘an enormous--seemingly expanding and never-ending---range of emergency powers.” The committee said: “This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough authority to rule the country without reference to normal constitutional processes… For 40 years (now over 70) freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of emergency.”
United Nations membership - In referring to the “war” between “We the People” and government in Public Law 313 dated 4-14-1952 we find: “Whereas the existing state of war...and the termination thereof…would render certain statutory provisions inoperative… Whereas some of these statutory provisions are needed to insure the…capacity of the United States to support the United Nations…it is desirable to extend these statutory provisions.” In simple words, United States membership in the United Nations is unconstitutional! To perpetuate the scam, the “emergency powers” have been renewed annually by every President.
In Senate testimony on May 11, 1955, former American Bar President Carl Rix said: “Congress is no longer bound by its Constitutional system of delegated power…..Congress may now legislate as an uninhibited body with no shackles of delegated powers under the Constitution. Our entire system of government of delegated powers of Congress has been changed to a system of undelegated power without amendment [of the Constitution] by the people of the United States.”
This was accomplished by Treaty and the ongoing “war” between the United States and its people. IS THIS LAWFUL? Absolutely not! Here’s why. Art.1, Sec.1 of the Constitution says: “all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.” Art.2 defines the powers of a president, including the “Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make treaties….” Since the House has no Constitutional authority regarding treaties but is a part of the Congress possessing all legislative power, it’s self evident treaties cannot lawfully make or modify our laws.
This position is consistent with the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Foster v. Neilson wherein the Court said: “A treaty cannot change the Constitution or be held valid if it be in violation of that document.” And in Reid v. Covert, the Court said: “It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, let alone alien to our constitutional history and tradition to construe Article 6 as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international agreement without observing Constitutional prohibitions.”
The above leads to a question and two conclusions. The question is: what part of no and all do those in our government (both state and Federal to include our law enforcement personnel) fail to understand? Please remember that our states created the Constitution; the first three articles of which created the Federal government. As such, our states hold the ultimate responsibility and authority for the proper interpretation and implementation of the Constitution. Obvious conclusions are: 1. Those in our Congress must be either terribly inept and incapable of solving an “Emergency” or they are guilty of crimes falling under Title 18 of the U.S. Criminal Code dealing with sedition, subversion, insurrection, rebellion, depriving Americans of their rights under the Constitution, treason and more and 2. The “emergency” powers must be terminated for the Constitution to again reign as the supreme law of our land.
Law by Executive Order - Though Art.1 Sec. 1 of the Constitution makes it clear that “ALL” legislative powers are vested in the Congress, Presidents have created new laws by simply placing them in the “Federal Register.” If not challenged by the Congress within 30 days, the Presidents submission becomes law. Following are examples of major governing changes by Executive Order.
Regional or “Metro” Government - President Nixon, via EO 11647, divided our nation into 10 Federal Regions and created governing “councils” composed of non-elected officials to exercise governing powers. The Federal Regional Councils are part of something variously known as Regional Government or Metropolitan Government or simply "Metro." In a nutshell, Metro is the governing of an area or region by a central body of "experts" ‑ planners who are usually appointed and vested with great powers, and who are not directly accountable to the people.
EO 13107 issued by President William J. Clinton became law on 1-10-99. It's one of many acts designed to undermine our Constitution, vitiate our inalienable rights, and destroy the concept of government of, by and for the people. Extracts of the EO follow. The underlining is by the writer for emphasis.
"Sec. 4. Interagency Working Group on Human Rights Treaties.
(a) There is hereby established an Interagency Working Group on Human Rights Treaties for the purpose of providing guidance, oversight, and coordination with respect to questions concerning the adherence to and implementation of human rights obligations and related matters........
(c) The principal functions of the Interagency Working Group shall include:
(i) coordinating the interagency review of any significant issues concerning the implementation of this order and analysis and recommendations in connection with pursuing the ratification of human rights treaties, as such questions may from time to time arise;
(iv) developing effective mechanisms to ensure that legislation proposed by the Administration is reviewed for conformity with international human rights obligations and that these obligations are taken into account in reviewing legislation under consideration by the Congress as well;
(v) developing....mechanisms for....monitoring of the actions by the various States, Commonwealths, and territories of the United States and, where appropriate, of Native Americans and Federally recognized Indian tribes, including the review of State, Commonwealth, and territorial laws for their conformity with relevant treaties...."
FACT re EO 13107: It's self evident that the "monitoring" of all "actions" and "laws" to insure "conformity with relevant treaties" amounts to an acceptance of treaties as being superior to our Constitution. This is contrary to the U.S. Supreme Court‘s statement saying: "This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty" (Reid vs Covert) and amounts to the formal installation of Global governance over America!
Immigration - The Federal government has failed to halt the invasion of America by illegal immigrants. This has dire consequences for the health, safety, and economic well being of Americans. For more on this subject, go to http://www.lawatchdog.com/SoberingVideo.html
Law by “Signing Statements” - When Congress passes a proposed law, it goes to the President who has two choices under the Constitution; sign it or veto it. But a new wrinkle has been added: Presidents began signing the bill with a statement attached giving their interpretation of the bill. In doing so, they are creating law in violation of Art. 1 of the Constitution.
CONCLUSION: These few examples of unlawful “Federal action” make our choices clear. We can continue to live our lives in denial of the overwhelming evidence staring at us or we can create a team to claim control of government by replacing those who fail to understand and pursue the Constitution in order to Take America Back to its lawful foundation. To help create such a team, go to www.thecnc.org/
12/07/2006
Two Acts of Tyranny On The Same Day!
On October 17, 2006, 'a date which will live in infamy' . . . there were two acts of tyranny committed. The first was a public signing of the 'Military Commissions Act of 2006' which suspended habeas corpus allowing the president to declare you an 'enemy combatant' and end your rights to seek legal or judicial relief from unlawful imprisonment.
The second act of tyranny took place in a private Oval Office ceremony, in which the president signed into law the 'John Warner National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2007' which essentially eliminates the protections of the Posse Comitatus Act and re-wrote the Insurrection Act. The NDAA will allow the president to declare a 'public emergency' and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to 'suppress public disorder'!
The Federal Reserve system is a privately owned and controlled corporation as evidenced in Lewis vs. U.S., case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentalities . . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations . . . federal reserve banks are listed neither as `wholly owned' government corporations [under 31 U.S.C. Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 U.S.C. Section 856].
Comments